HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| FAITHLESS-JES

FAITHLESS-JES [14140841] [] "Jesse"

# Statistics

Favourites: 25; Deviations: 6; Watchers: 4

Watching: 1; Pageviews: 3577; Comments Made: 117; Friends: 1


# Comments

Comments: 69

amymist [2010-10-12 23:06:11 +0000 UTC]

I kinda wish I could do something about ~BrutallyHonest2U I've seen him around and... Eh. I have no problem with honesty, and mild trolling, but what he does... I can't wrap my mind around it. His deviations, for the most part I can handle, but... I don't really know how to say this, but...

I may not know you, or agree with you, but I'm sorry you had to deal with him.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to amymist [2010-11-25 13:28:25 +0000 UTC]

No worries. BrutallyHonest2U is a part of a larger mass of people who, for some reason I can't identify, have lost their ability to empathise with people outside their own group. In real life these are the people who pick on the weak and fear the strong. I'm almost sure of this because no strong person sit's on the internet for large amounts of time trying to piss people off. A strong person would rather piss people off in real life. It's much more entertaining.
So the joke is really on her

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

amymist In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-11-29 17:46:52 +0000 UTC]

I suppose so. Still seems a little odd that anyone would take it as far as she does.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kineso In reply to amymist [2010-10-17 18:41:48 +0000 UTC]

She*

is a woman. Learn to read.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

amymist In reply to Kineso [2010-10-19 17:14:05 +0000 UTC]

Sorry. ^.^'

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

layger7 [2010-10-07 16:02:35 +0000 UTC]

do you have play a game?
i dont know... mario, do you enjoy that game?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to layger7 [2010-11-25 13:15:46 +0000 UTC]

the only game I play is call of duty: black ops, and i play it 4-6 hours a day

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

layger7 In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-11-25 17:34:24 +0000 UTC]

PARODY: YOU MANIAC! YOU KILL PEOPLE ON A GAME!
LOL.

Go and play free

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to layger7 [2010-11-30 16:20:53 +0000 UTC]

LOL nah you don't understand how good this game is. No other game compares. Except modern warfare 2 and modern warfare.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

layger7 In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-12-01 00:43:01 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, KILLING PEOPLE ITZ AMAZING!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to layger7 [2010-12-12 13:39:06 +0000 UTC]

Umm do you not realise the difference between killing real people and playing a computer generated game that involves alot of strategy and skill to outsmart other players? If you don't your grammar really does indicate how stupid you are.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

layger7 In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-12-12 21:03:06 +0000 UTC]

Dont worry Peta guy, Theres a zombie mod on Call of dutty black ops...

You can kill nazi zombies...

Nazi, Zombies...

Have fun!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to layger7 [2010-12-14 15:38:41 +0000 UTC]

WTF man that's not a mod, it's a part of the game. I only play online. All the other shit bores me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

layger7 In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-12-15 16:40:08 +0000 UTC]

Dude, The other part of the game make me see the light!
I was like some nazi shit dude.
Games have some nice messages!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to layger7 [2010-12-18 14:46:42 +0000 UTC]

There isn't really a message. People get banned for Nazi emblems. That's not the game makers fault.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

layger7 In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-12-19 07:45:55 +0000 UTC]

Dude...

You Get any point in Any Movie, Book or Game?

Like the moral of the story...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to layger7 [2010-12-29 13:51:11 +0000 UTC]

i have already said, i don't play the campaign. the multiplayer has no moral because it is so far detached from anything that is real.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

layger7 In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-12-30 01:38:29 +0000 UTC]

Take the good of the life, friend.
Even if is a videogame

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PolandballRocks [2010-08-21 18:31:10 +0000 UTC]

i miss ya .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to PolandballRocks [2010-08-24 01:22:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks
I'm still here. Just less opinionated and angry, so I don't reply to everyone.
Anyone who is kind I will reply to though, so feel free to talk anytime.
Thanks again for your kind words.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

BrutallyHonest2U In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-08-28 18:44:51 +0000 UTC]

Glad to see you learned your lesson.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PolandballRocks In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-08-24 13:00:24 +0000 UTC]

man fights make life interesting .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MikuHatsune14 [2010-08-09 22:21:45 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the fave on ADHD
<33
much appreciated

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dreamorphosis [2010-07-10 11:53:56 +0000 UTC]

Hey mate!

Thanks a lot for the fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BrutallyHonest2U [2010-07-07 18:02:20 +0000 UTC]

you bring much lulz.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to BrutallyHonest2U [2010-07-08 00:48:52 +0000 UTC]

everyone else posting brings me much lulz. rational conversation is impossible with you people. get back to /b/ fag

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BrutallyHonest2U In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-07-08 02:58:31 +0000 UTC]

lol you have no right to talk about rational conversation, with the stupidity you have shown.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

the-blood-oath In reply to BrutallyHonest2U [2010-07-13 15:05:27 +0000 UTC]

Lol I should repeat that sentence to you, for that was obviously composed to be said to themselves.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to the-blood-oath [2010-07-28 02:27:50 +0000 UTC]

Wow I only just noticed this.
Thanks the-blood-oath
I always try to sum up an argument based on its logic and not its emotional value.
The fact that you admitted you were trolling means that all your arguments immediately fail. Trolling is trying to stir up a strong emotional response from someone by opposing their views, while for the most part being irrational, because this is what makes people most angry.
I encountered very little strong arguments in the responses on that picture. Mainly because eating meat is such a hard thing to defend, and an easy thing to attack. It really is a simple argument.
All it comes down to is: if you value the life of your dog, your cat, your mentally disabled brother, why not value the life of a sheep, a cow, chicken? Really, what is the difference? I would base the value of a life mainly on its level of conciousness and it's ability to feel happiness, sadness and suffering. While I often do value the life of a well meaning human over that of a chicken, that does not mean I should treat the chicken like something to be used, exploited, like an object without conciousness. Non-human animals without a question do not deserve the same consideration for their interests as sticks and stones do. But this is what is given to them. Please tell me you see this BrutallyHonest2U.
That kind of argument comes so easily to me, as I imagine it does for most believers in animal rights. Because it is something so deeply ingrained in us. It's a part of our empathy and good nature that has been closed off by this society. It's something more than just an idea or set of beliefs. Something that cannot be questioned. But in this world where so many views are presented to us as right, we often can't see the ones that really matter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

BrutallyHonest2U In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-07-31 10:23:09 +0000 UTC]

"if you value the life of your dog, your cat, your mentally disabled brother, why not value the life of a sheep, a cow, chicken? Really, what is the difference?

You just lumped my autistic brother with sheep, cows, chickens, cats, and dogs, and you expect me to take you seriously?

I hope you realize that a lot of people on this site are autistic and don't take kindly to PETArds comparing them to animals.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to BrutallyHonest2U [2010-08-02 13:00:56 +0000 UTC]

I don't know the extent of your brothers disablity. That probably was an incorrect statement. It was late, my mind wasn't working. If he has the intelligence of a two or three year old then I would put him in that category. If he doesn't, then of course I wouldn't. I have ADHD which is similar to autism in some ways so don't think I'm insensitive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

kitsumekat In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-08-04 07:01:31 +0000 UTC]

I have ADHD which is similar to autism in some ways so don't think I'm insensitive.

No the fuck it's not! How dare you insult people who have austism and ADHD!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to kitsumekat [2010-08-04 13:13:24 +0000 UTC]

WTF!?!? I said I HAVE ADHD. Why would I insult myself?

👍: 0 ⏩: 4

Goreblowndeer In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-09-01 01:39:06 +0000 UTC]

I'm an senior EXCUSE PATROL OFFICER, and your in violation of using an excuse.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alphagamaomega In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-08-23 23:00:35 +0000 UTC]

I'm not biased in this conversation (well more in favor of BrutallyHonest) , but Faithless, from what I see here, you have been defeated in an irrevocable, and uneraseable way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

barrel-of-melons In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-08-16 05:40:21 +0000 UTC]

damn hippies

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kitsumekat In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-08-04 18:36:12 +0000 UTC]

You just insulted people have their ADHD under control and used it as a stupid excuse!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BrutallyHonest2U In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-08-02 14:41:51 +0000 UTC]

Way to use ADHD as an excuse to shit all over the internet with stupid comments.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FAITHLESS-JES In reply to BrutallyHonest2U [2010-08-03 04:02:33 +0000 UTC]

What? That wasn't an excuse. I was saying that I am not insensitive about autistic people, because my mind works in a somewhat similar way. It had nothing to do an excuse for anything. Your mind is more fucked than mine HAHAHA.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BrutallyHonest2U In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-08-03 14:20:31 +0000 UTC]

"Your mind is more fucked than mine HAHAHA."

lol I don't think it's possible for anyone's mind to be more fucked than yours.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Goreblowndeer In reply to BrutallyHonest2U [2010-09-01 01:38:14 +0000 UTC]

agreed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

the-blood-oath In reply to FAITHLESS-JES [2010-07-31 03:13:52 +0000 UTC]

No problem =] Only stating the truth.

It's sad to see humans's minds clouded in hatred. Clouded in bias opinions set on from someone you admire. Sad...

Good strong points. I hope she sees the points. If she refuses to I will be glad to point them out once again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BrutallyHonest2U In reply to the-blood-oath [2010-07-13 16:35:27 +0000 UTC]

says the furfag. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the-blood-oath In reply to BrutallyHonest2U [2010-07-13 17:37:03 +0000 UTC]

I love how you consider that an insult to me.

I also love how you cannot back up your theories with facts, so you try to shoot them down with insults =] It gets more people angry with you rather than be on your side

Stop being immature about things and read what people are telling you. If you're so "smart" you should have figured that out. You might have actually learned something from it too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BrutallyHonest2U In reply to the-blood-oath [2010-07-13 21:08:37 +0000 UTC]

It is an insult.

Faithless-Jes hasn't said a single rational thing, so you are defending him in vain.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the-blood-oath In reply to BrutallyHonest2U [2010-07-14 14:33:00 +0000 UTC]

No, he has proven his theory with points, you have with insults.

I have sent this to two of my friends, and both, though I'll say they are not on either side of the extreme, told me, and I quote from one of them: "wow. They're immature. If she's going to have a debate why doesn't she at least TRY giving valid points. She's not doing a good job."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BrutallyHonest2U In reply to the-blood-oath [2010-07-14 18:19:22 +0000 UTC]

lol, Faithless Jes didn't give ANY valid points. You are just biased. And what do you expect from a fucking troll?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the-blood-oath In reply to BrutallyHonest2U [2010-07-15 13:54:28 +0000 UTC]

Lol you're obviously not reading his comments.

Am I biased? No. I admit I used to be. However, now, if you would explain your point of view with logic and valid points I will actually listen and give the point a second chance. But so far you have done or said nothing to prove me wrong.

Just for debate's sake, if you were in a courtroom with him, you would have lost. If this was a stable debate, I would not have come in, however I feel that your side is lacking. Regardless of the debate, I feel like you're side is weak. Perhaps not wrong, since I have not heard of a valid point yet so I do not know what is in your mind, just weak. And that is not a bias opinion.

You need to remember, I am a third party, so I see both sides. Though I agree with Jes' points more, you need to understand that I listen to both sides, since I am not the main targets in the argument.

That being said, until you prove to me valid points from your side, I will consider you an immature and ignorant child. If you prove to me you have reason to believe what you think, I will consider and shut up, for even though this is a debate, in this no side is 100% correct, since it's mostly about opinion. I cannot argue that you're wrong, but I can try to convince you otherwise.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BrutallyHonest2U In reply to the-blood-oath [2010-07-15 18:04:26 +0000 UTC]

I did read them. If you agree with him that there is "no logic" behind not eating our own species, you aren't worth talking to.

Everyone and everything is biased to a certain degree. You trying to claim that you aren't is laughable.

This is not a courtroom, it is the internet. And you just lost.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

the-blood-oath In reply to BrutallyHonest2U [2010-07-31 03:04:57 +0000 UTC]

LOL It is the internet, therefore no judge. How have I lost when no one has been claimed a winner by a neutral party?

I admitted before that I was bias. But I have learned both sides and know what is flawed and what isn't. If you want to be a child and pout and cry to get your way so be it. Know that it won't get you far.

One that can think for itself, eat what it wants and move where it pleases all needs respect. The level of it's intelligence and looks get someone nowhere. You are being bias in the sense to think that one is above another, when we are all the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2


| Next =>