Qoph-Silraqh In reply to Cat-man-dancing [2016-02-13 04:13:48 +0000 UTC]

Now a late thank-you! I do have to ask who you are, though. It's been so long. I took a quick look at your page and see that you make train layouts. I dig trains, but it unfortunately did not spark any memories.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cat-man-dancing In reply to Qoph-Silraqh [2016-02-13 05:16:03 +0000 UTC]

I'm tempted to insert a raspy voice here: "I'm Top Cat"...
But that joke's been done to death.
Honestly, I don't know.
Your name is familiar, but other than that...
I sent you a birthday greeting?
I'm either losing my mind or the painkillers were doing a fine job that day!

Wait- are you a friend of kajm.deviantart.com/ ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to Cat-man-dancing [2016-02-13 11:07:52 +0000 UTC]

No, I don't think I know them. Maybe we just met on here through browsing. Or do you play any MUDs? In any case, you seem like a respectable chap. I don't oppose your virtual company.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cat-man-dancing In reply to Qoph-Silraqh [2016-02-13 11:15:53 +0000 UTC]

Cool, thanks. I have to get some sleep now, I'll be back later.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to Cat-man-dancing [2016-02-14 16:37:28 +0000 UTC]

You kind of just stopped posting photos of your train sets. Did you ever finish working on them?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to Sarsarinstars [2011-08-01 00:19:25 +0000 UTC]

For what reason?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to ChunLo [2009-10-07 05:26:34 +0000 UTC]

Of course Sorry, I like to comment, but I was (and am) really tired. I think prolonged inhalation of skunk fumes is making me feel sick, too. That's never happened before. Ugh, is that normal?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to MrMushroomMan [2008-12-03 20:47:52 +0000 UTC]

I just checked last night. I was wrong! It's chrome film: Agfachrome 50. The Fujifilm film listed in there was just called Fujichrome. Was there at one point a plain ol' Fujichrome and no Velvia, Provia, or Astia?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrMushroomMan In reply to Qoph-Silraqh [2008-12-03 21:22:16 +0000 UTC]

I don't think so, I think they just call all their slide films "fujichrome"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to MrMushroomMan [2008-12-04 15:37:26 +0000 UTC]

I just find it odd that the book didn't specify which Fujichrome it was. Unless it was like Kodachrome once upon a time, and was only called Fujichrome. By the way, random question...Why do lens names end with 'kor' or 'non'? Rokkor and Fujinon, for example.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrMushroomMan In reply to Qoph-Silraqh [2008-12-06 01:58:19 +0000 UTC]

I don't know much about lenses, I'd try ~FallisPhoto or `shagie

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to MrMushroomMan [2008-12-06 05:16:40 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah, Michael is probably a sure win. He's a freaking text book. *snicker* Charles may know too. He told me about naturally-bloomed lenses. Those are cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrMushroomMan In reply to Qoph-Silraqh [2008-12-06 06:30:54 +0000 UTC]

Naturally bloomed lenses? That just sounds like an uncoated lens?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to MrMushroomMan [2008-12-06 14:20:12 +0000 UTC]

All roads lead back to dA. I was searching for something on it and the best thing I could find is Charles' original post. :-P [link] It's a natural coating that happens over time. On the three first posts to the thread.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrMushroomMan In reply to Qoph-Silraqh [2008-12-06 15:43:34 +0000 UTC]

Ah, an early coated lens.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to MrMushroomMan [2008-11-26 12:01:48 +0000 UTC]

I don't know, but that's a really cool picture. I had to leave a comment. ' The shot I saw taken with it was a studio portrait (head and shoulders) of a girl with a colourful scarf on. So it would look a little different, I imagine. I'll find out this weekend. I'm going to my father's house after Thanksgiving.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to justeline [2008-10-27 15:18:08 +0000 UTC]

Of course The way you set up those three avatars is cool. Sorry I didn't actually comment on the Deviation. I usually do; I just couldn't think of anything at the time. 'Tis quite lovely, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

justeline In reply to Qoph-Silraqh [2008-10-27 22:21:20 +0000 UTC]

It's ok honey, i have the same problem with commenting too. I don't like just faving, but sometimes nothing comes to mind.
Take care, thanks once again

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to Henriksen [2008-10-21 15:40:57 +0000 UTC]

Ah, but of course.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to projectTiGER [2008-10-15 11:00:15 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, thank you. I like it because it's very clean-looking. Being so white and cell-shaded.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to violetda [2008-10-11 00:57:00 +0000 UTC]

Not a problem, and you're welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Qoph-Silraqh In reply to kvetka [2008-09-19 06:30:52 +0000 UTC]

Certainly
You deserve far more exposure than you're currently getting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0