HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| quantumpixel
quantumpixel
[241937]
[]
"The ReBeL without a Revolution"
# Statistics
Favourites: 35; Deviations: 0; Watchers: 31
Watching: 41; Pageviews: 8333; Comments Made: 1139; Friends: 41
# Comments
Comments: 156
you know i was going threw my galley and i dont think i ever thanked you for your comments on my stuff thanks again
π: 0 β©: 0
u know i have a clip that was taken in 1942 in the retake of Satlingrad...man i love seing thos nationalist socialists getting killed...and then i have another that is in 1945 in germany and i see a group of soviet comrads rapping and killing famlies of NAZIS SCUM!! just like they did to the Soviet union...im glad we didnt caught u all because i will
Pedro Porfirio Lopes, Portugal a comunist/stalinist and anti Fascism
π: 0 β©: 1
So communism, to you, stands for raping and killing innocent women and children?
Good job!
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks for your comments. Get some art up here! haha.
- Fre-Lanz
π: 0 β©: 0
Hmmm... What can you tell me about mixing National Socialism with Extreme Catholic Ideology? What was or what is the role of religion in the philosophy of national socialism.
What happens in Poland now is very dramatic... One one hand, the leading party, the prime minister and the president are all generally extreme catholics and quite nationalistic in a way... They also seem to be very socialist in a way. But they have it all mixed up so fucking bad...
First of all - the nationalism that they claim is: Fuck Russia! (which i perfectly agree with) and, Love USA! Love Bush! (which i totally disagree with).
Secondly, the socialism that they claim is: very stringent laws for entrepreneurs and very good money for the lazy unemployed people. So instead of creating new jobs, giving people work, they would rather give them money. What kind of destructive socialism is that?
Thirdly, the extreme catholicism that they preach is just pure fucking nonsense. They claim to be pro-family and pro-life, but actually what they preach is anti-woman and patriarchal. For example, it is no surprise that they oppose abortion. Which is not good in my opinion, as it should be allowed in cases of rape or early dysfunctions. I know it's sad and extreme, but it has to be like that. But at the same time that they oppose abortion, they also oppose in-vitro conception! Even the safe type of that where no eggs are killed. This is just ridiculous and insane.
So... what is your opinon on that? I would appreciate it.
π: 0 β©: 0
'=RedOut' - "Are you saying that he's wrong because he lost a trial against him?.
There's freedom for you, dont believe in the holocaust and they take your home.."
Basically during the course of the trial, ALL of Irving's evidence that the Holocaust didn't happen was proved to be wrong. Not some, but ALL.
In proving that Irving's revisionist evidence was false, the defence also proved that the Holocaust did happen, in the process exploding all revisionist theories about the Holocaust not happening. An extract from High Court Judge Charles Gray's ruling in the David Irving libel suit:
"It is my conclusion that no objective, fair-minded historian would have serious cause to doubt that there were gas chambers at Auschwitz and that they were operated on a substantial scale to kill hundreds of thousands of Jews."
You can read the entire judgement here: [link]
As to 'illusions667', the Irving trail basically proved that Irving was a liar, because he knew what happened but lied about it, and in the course of proving that he had the documents, knew the truth and lied about them the defense proved that these things happened (the exterminatoin at Auschwitz, and other facts about the Holocaust).
All the Holocaust deniers here have classic cases of cognitive dissonance, so I guess these words will be lost on you. Long live free speech.
π: 0 β©: 0
Favourite artist: -|[ Adolf Hitler ... ]|-
π: 0 β©: 1
so sad 
π: 0 β©: 0
David Irving has been proven wrong: the Holocaust did happen. Suck it down quantum. [link]
π: 0 β©: 1
Are you saying that he's wrong because he lost a trial against him?.
There's freedom for you, dont believe in the holocaust and they take your home..
π: 0 β©: 2
David Irving is very fishy, in my opinion. His actions as well as some of the things he does make him suspicious. I think he's a government infiltrator with the intent of corrupting honest revisionism. You'd be surprised to know how common infiltration in dissident circles is, these days.
Irving gets all the attention with his silly law suits (of which many are started by himself!) and bogus claims, while honest revisionists such as Siegfried Verbeke, David Cole (a jew!), JΓΌrgen Graf or Germar Rudolf -- of which most are also in prison or have been in prison just for their lack of belief in the official holocaust myth -- are barely known by the public. Unlike Irving, most revisionists are never allowed to prove what they stand for, but are just put in jail for the mere non-belief in the holocaust dogmas, which is a crime in certain countries.
Irving, however, did get the chance to prove his views, but he did a miserable job of it.... as if he wanted to lose. Several of his views are complete bogus anyway, though. Still, for many he is THE revisionist. Many people -- like this ~soinotna fool -- just think of Irving when they think of revisionism. Why is that?
The issue of truth versus dogma (revisionism vs holocaust myths) is much more complicated than it seems, and stakes are very high. People base their political preferences on the past, and the truth could completely shake the foundations of modern 'democracy'.... which is why it is illegal to say certain facts in many countries and why government agents are actively involved in this.
There are two histories : official history, lying, and then secret history, where you find the real causes of events" (HonorΓ© de Balzac)
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." (George Orwell)
π: 0 β©: 0
David Irving is very fishy, in my opinion. His actions as well as some of the things he does make him suspicious. I think he's a government infiltrator with the intent of corrupting honest revisionism. You'd be surprised to know how common infiltration in dissident circles is, these days.
Irving gets all the attention with his silly law suits (of which many are started by himself!) and bogus claims, while honest revisionists such as Siegfried Verbeke, David Cole (a jew!), JΓΌrgen Graf or Germar Rudolf -- of which most are also in prison or have been in prison just for their lack of belief in the official holocaust myth -- are barely known by the public. Unlike Irving, most revisionists are never allowed to prove what they stand for, but are just put in jail for the mere non-belief in the holocaust dogmas, which is a crime in certain countries.
Irving, however, did get the chance to prove his views, but he did a miserable job of it.... as if he wanted to lose. Several of his views are complete bogus anyway, though. Still, for many he is THE revisionist. Many people -- like this ~soinotna fool -- just think of Irving when they think of revisionism. Why is that?
The issue of truth versus dogma (revisionism vs holocaust myths) is much more complicated than it seems, and stakes are very high. People base their political preferences on the past, and the truth could completely shake the foundations of modern 'democracy'.... which is why it is illegal to say certain facts in many countries and why government agents are actively involved in this.
There are two histories : official history, lying, and then secret history, where you find the real causes of events" (HonorΓ© de Balzac)
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." (George Orwell)
π: 0 β©: 1
Irving gets all the attention with his silly law suits (of which many are started by himself!) and bogus claims, while honest revisionists such as Siegfried Verbeke, David Cole (a jew!), JΓΌrgen Graf or Germar Rudolf
nooooooo I am not racist at all you told me
bonne sante a vous et a toute votre famille !
π: 0 β©: 0
Did you say "Hitler is the face of our movement"? I'm sorry, but if that's the case, then FUCK THAT.
If you think you can come in here and spread fascism you are wrong... sorely wrong. The Nazis put on a "National Socialist" front to win "hearts", and then they fucked everyone over, revealing their true fascist nature. If that's what YOU plan to do... then FUCK YOU. Ya Basta!
Besides that, Nationalism in itself is inherently evil. So is privatization. If you think the anarchists and radicals on deviantART won't do everything in their power to kick you out of here, you're wrong again.
π: 0 β©: 1
are you kidding me ??? ya basta !!!
π: 0 β©: 2
.... wtf?
I support any group fighting against capitalism. Is that so "ironic"?
At least I'm not a fucking "National Socialist" (aka: nazi) fascist like you are.
π: 0 β©: 1
Do you have any idea what you're talking about.
You just said Socialist and Fascist, in the same sentence.
I'd really like to know if your brain is functioning at all!
I think maybe if you re-do highschool,
Your history teacher will tell you:
Fascism is the opposite to Communism
Capitalism is the opposite to Socialism
Now take a long, hard look at these facts.
I'll let you figure out the rest.
fascist socialist...
π: 0 β©: 2
I was pissed-off and being irrational when I made that comment, so I apologize to all of you. I realize that Socialism is opposed to Fascism, but my point was that the Nazis called themselves "National Socialists" when they took power. I'm just wondering why you would still call yourself a "National Socialist" after that? I would be ashamed. I realize things change (as everything does) through history, but it just seems kind of... odd that you would call yourself that. Just my opinion.
I hope we can talk about this further without any insults. It was my fault for starting them. Sorry.
π: 0 β©: 0
Do you have any idea what you're talking about.
You just said Socialist and Fascist, in the same sentence.
Fascism is the opposite to Communism
Capitalism is the opposite to Socialism
Actually it's a bit more complicated than that. You're thinking too black & white.
national socialism is oposed to traditional socialism (which includes communism)
national socialism is oposed to capitalism
capitalism is oposed to most forms of traditional socialism (which includes communism)
capitalism is oposed to national socialism & national anarchism
communism is oposed to capitalism
communism is oposed to national socialism
National socialism and national anarchism are more or less economically left wing and morally right wing, but it doesn't really fall within the left<->right categories of traditional politics, which is why a contemporary national socialist / national anarchist organisation has called itself "Third Position".
National socialism is indeed a fascist ideology, but there's more to it. National socialism has a lot of social aspects added to the ideology, that are missing in the basic concepts of fascism. One could say that national socialism is an add-on to fascism. The typical aspects of fascism are there, though (ie a strong leader and military-like hierarchic system, implementation of natural law, strong nationalism, strong hierarchy, preference of the needs of the many over the needs of individuals, ...).
fascist socialist...
Though national socialism is socialist in the way that it focusses the needs of the laborers and farmers, it is based on natural law as well as the theories of Neitsche, Heidegger and certain other philosophers, which is very different from traditional socialism that is based on Marxism. Therefor, it is not a good thing to refer to national socialism as socialist. Hitler always strongly oposed traditional socialism, because he believed it turned good people against each other.
π: 0 β©: 1
Clearly i have to research much, much more.
Thank you for the heads-up.
π: 0 β©: 0
Wooo, you'd better watch out for those Anarchists man!
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
wow... a guy who supports economy and job damaging ideals, way to go anarchism!
π: 0 β©: 0
Yes, so i accidentally found you, and i would normally hold myself from commenting, but i think i should. I got very angry at first (that where my comment came from), but then i started reading and watching. I have to say that I do agree with some opinions and views found here, and i see i will have to read more. On the other hand, what really is wrong here is that to really promote your ideas you should use new symbols, new examples, because most of all, the sfastika sign is not credible, it's imprinted in minds of billions of people for ages, as the sign of inhuman evil, sum of all fears and the top of all sins, almost like the sign of hell.
So i believe that in order to have more credibility and to spawn less hate, you should choose a new path, so as to not connect the positive and peaceful philosophy with the most sinful, sick and unholy mistake in history, which was what the german nation did to all other nations during the ww2.
Better start with a new blank sheet of paper. And never allow it to be stained with blood of the innocent.
π: 0 β©: 0
hehe.. I think you would like the style of this pic I just did..
[link]
how's it going my friend?
π: 0 β©: 0
i bet you read every comment .. ..
granted you are thoughtfull in your presentation ... and well written ... you are so wrong .. sad so because intelligence like your should be focused in such a different direction ..
I just heard that Hitler was inbred and because maddness was in his family it may have been passed on
i will give you this .. he was a very good conceptual artist
π: 0 β©: 0
oh wow. last few times i checked your account there were no real updates... now i got lots of deviations to check & tell you how wrong they are
if i got time somewhen soon (not really likely, seeing all those upcoming exams and crap) i'll check back here to leave some meaningful & critical comments. with the time i got now all i could do would be to write "your opinion sucks" under each deviation without even having really looked at it and thought about it... not really making sense, that.
but i'll come back for smth that does make sense, if i can find the time to do so.
-me-
π: 0 β©: 1
im looking forward to "your opinion suck"... seems to be a popular notion around this site...
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't agree with your ideals, but you make excellent pieces of art. I must 
π: 0 β©: 1
thanks, its appreciated !
π: 0 β©: 0
no no no no, thanks YOU for delighting us with such incredible vision !!!
I just love the way you vector !
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks for the comment. Yay. :hearts: for you now.
π: 0 β©: 1
hey np... lots of talent, shoud be proud of urself !!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Wow, thanks. o_O' I still feel all special because I got comments from you.
π: 0 β©: 1
im glad my comment made you feel special... cuz thats the point... :hugs:
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you for visiting and the nice comments!
You are awesome
π: 0 β©: 0
I am not a national socialist, but I must say that technically speaking, your work is amazing, I just love the way you devenlop your designs.
My respects.
π: 0 β©: 1
I never assumed you we're a National-Socialist. Therefore I appreciate much more your comments, since they are unbiased !!!
My Respect goes for you as well.
Thanks for the comments on my stuff, it does mean a alot.
π: 0 β©: 0
hey buddy 
heh nice to meet you 
π: 0 β©: 0
Palant! You're fuckin' idiot!! Do you want another Holocaust asshole?
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>