t3hpython In reply to saucydragun [2011-06-30 16:12:45 +0000 UTC]

Welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t3hpython In reply to fencingowlphotos [2011-04-04 01:55:58 +0000 UTC]

Quite welcome, thank you for taking a fantastic picture!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t3hpython In reply to TheBlueShadow [2009-11-20 14:23:30 +0000 UTC]

Two. One to screw in the light bulb, and the other to ponder the nature of the bulb and what it represents metaphorically and metaphysically.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

TheBlueShadow In reply to t3hpython [2009-11-21 05:51:27 +0000 UTC]

Very astute answer, I might just keep that one instead, though, for your amusement, here is the one the query was originally paired with:

Two: One to screw it in and one to observe how the light bulb itself symbolizes a single incandescent beacon of subjective reality in a netherworld of endless absurdity reaching out toward a maudlin cosmos of nothingness.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

t3hpython In reply to TheBlueShadow [2009-11-22 08:12:16 +0000 UTC]

nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlueShadow In reply to t3hpython [2009-11-22 23:20:45 +0000 UTC]

Glad you approve

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t3hpython In reply to t3hpython [2009-11-20 14:23:52 +0000 UTC]

How many surrealists does it take to screw in a light bulb?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlueShadow In reply to t3hpython [2009-11-21 06:15:15 +0000 UTC]

only two...one to screw it in and one to make sure he can still read by its light as it drapes itself over the elephant

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

t3hpython In reply to TheBlueShadow [2009-11-22 08:12:03 +0000 UTC]

nope. it's fish.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlueShadow In reply to t3hpython [2009-11-22 23:23:06 +0000 UTC]

ah...I see, and now it makes so much more sense. what would we do without surrealism? our lives would be so much less enriched

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t3hpython In reply to x3TehSlacker [2009-11-17 20:35:16 +0000 UTC]

Welcome! You have some good stuff, what can I say?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t3hpython In reply to Kitty-Caesar [2009-10-03 05:08:24 +0000 UTC]

AYE! TIS ME!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kitty-Caesar In reply to t3hpython [2009-10-03 05:44:48 +0000 UTC]

lol Thought so!
How'd you find me? ... Not that I was hiding or anything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

t3hpython In reply to Kitty-Caesar [2009-10-03 15:59:05 +0000 UTC]

your comment on one of the tigercon kid's pages

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kitty-Caesar In reply to t3hpython [2009-10-03 21:21:32 +0000 UTC]

Aaaaah. I see. Sketch Sham is sketch. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

t3hpython In reply to Kitty-Caesar [2009-10-04 01:30:43 +0000 UTC]

But of course!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kitty-Caesar In reply to t3hpython [2009-10-04 04:29:31 +0000 UTC]

LOL

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t3hpython In reply to Mindyourmuffins [2009-07-20 01:48:39 +0000 UTC]

sup

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

t3hpython In reply to StevenSwims67 [2007-08-01 00:07:27 +0000 UTC]

haha, you're welcome, but thats waht's called "constructive critiscism"

sorry if it seemed unkind.

i'll watch you too, you have to click "watch this deviant" on the top right of my profile

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StevenSwims67 In reply to t3hpython [2007-08-01 00:19:30 +0000 UTC]

figured it out, thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0