HOME | DD

044 β€” 044 Website Preview

Published: 2006-04-15 01:34:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 4419; Favourites: 10; Downloads: 1009
Redirect to original
Description The image above is a collection of screenshots of the 044 Digital Artistry website I am currently in the process of developing. Props to Jesar for the style, we just wanted a simple way to show off without giving our website completely away -=]. Be sure to check out Jesar.The site is coded entirely in PHP, XHTML, and Flash Actionscript. I hope all of you 044 members enjoy the preview and the small taste of our site design and what is to come. - iStormz
Related content
Comments: 86

NullVoiD [2006-05-06 18:39:32 +0000 UTC]

stupidy asshole.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

liqachu [2006-05-06 08:15:45 +0000 UTC]

aye, yet another dc clone!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ekud [2006-05-06 06:33:04 +0000 UTC]

yet another depthcore clone. design something original, ffs...

and i would seriously advise against telling me to 'stfu', like you have every other person who has expressed their opinion that you are copying the hell out of us. which you are.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S-Gen In reply to ekud [2006-05-07 15:57:39 +0000 UTC]

i'm glad you have the humility to think your site has a copyright on the use of black and grey templates

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ekud In reply to S-Gen [2006-05-08 01:25:45 +0000 UTC]

Except that we didn't use a template in the design of our website - our website has become the template?

I don't really know how to respond to your message, that wasn't really english.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S-Gen In reply to ekud [2006-05-08 22:32:47 +0000 UTC]

then obviously, you cannot read. By template, i meant the design and layout of your site. Your site is black, grey, and three-columned, as is ours, and you have the audacity to accuse us of copying you? With all the sites out now, how can you sit there and arrogantly accuse us of copying you. Yes you were here before us and many other groups, but it does not mean you have a copyright on the use of black, grey, and three-columned templates.

I admire your work a lot, and what you have done for the art community, and forever will <3 dC but i think you guys are letting it go to your head if you think people are just copying your site.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ekud In reply to S-Gen [2006-05-09 08:39:35 +0000 UTC]

Abstract art groups are a fairly specific kind of website, and when the "figurehead" has utilised one kind of format for nigh on three years, I think it is a fair call to say that any subsequent sites that spring up years later have been heavily influenced to the point of imitation if they choose to use that template as well. You should be able to put that together for yourself. It's the same if another art-site came up that even used deviantarts green, much less its format - people would make the same observation, and be completely justified in expressing their opinion, which is all I am attempting to do.

I'll thank you kindly to stop being a name-calling little bitch as well. Don't think that because you tack compliments on to the end of insults like 'audacious' and 'arrogant' that i'll think you're being mature or level headed - you're being a coward and hiding your true convictions behind feigned politeness. I'm a dual-major creative writing student in university, you'll have to take my word that I am more than capable of reading and understanding your words. I also understand I just called you a bitch, and thats a conviction I'll back to the hilt.

Let's break this down a little.

In my opinion, in terms of abstract art sites, it is fair to say that anyone who uses a black/grey three columned site with exactly the same content sections as our site (which had them before any other) can be fairly accussed of imitation of depthcore.

If you disagree, thats fine, but kindly keep your impertinent tongue to yourself. I don't think this is really worthy of any more discussion personally, but I'm sure you'll disagree.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S-Gen In reply to ekud [2006-05-09 13:15:54 +0000 UTC]

This further proves your arrogance. I was not hiding my true convictions by complimenting you, yet you are so sure of yourself, that you proceed to tell me what i did. Don't think that your college education or age gives you the ability to see through everything someone says. I was not complimenting you to try to persuade you to change your opinions, I wanted to show you that I wasn't against you, but rather just against what you were saying. Yet, you think you know me better than I know myself. If you think you are able to do this, you aren't anything but arrogant. I'm also relieved that you called me a bitch because i disagreed with your opinions. That is a sign of maturity that our society lacks oh so much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ekud In reply to S-Gen [2006-05-09 15:06:05 +0000 UTC]

Dude, you're being silly about this.

It is obvious that if any site uses a similar layout to the 'archytpical' site of its genre, it will be labelled as an imitation.

Stop trying to be intelligent and realise the blatant truth.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S-Gen In reply to ekud [2006-05-09 21:20:03 +0000 UTC]

First of all, I agree that your site is the "archtypical" site of the genre, but with all the sites coming out now, it is hard for one not to have similarities in look and layout to it. Also, it is much easier to have the 3-column layout for such a site, which is why we are using it as well. However, while I agree in this regard, i completely disagree with the way most of the depthcore people are reacting, yourself included. We should not be looked down upon because our site resembles yours; rather we are just another group coexisting in the art community and wish to show what we can do.
Second of all, I would really appreciate if you would refrain from insulting or questioning my intelligence, because that is not needed here. I won't say I am smarter than you, because I know I'm not; you have a college education, and I have not yet graduated. Should I be looked down on for this? Certainly not. You seem to act like you know me so well, and that because of your supreme knowledge of my language that you can change the meaning of my words to make me look like a fool.
Thirdly, your "bitch" comment was uncalledfor, and hardly appropriate for a staff member to make. I was not trying to "call you names", but because of your stance on the issue, and how you seemed to only focus on our site, and gives us a bad name based on that, rather than looking deeper, I called you arrogant. Whether you are or not is beside the point; it is how I thought you were at the time, and if you cannot admit that your actions and words were not respectful, then I will hold that opinion of you.
Forthly, as stated above, it would be appreciated if you could focus on our group as a whole rather than looking down on us for having a similar site to you. Obviously this will be tough because there is definite tension between us, but rather than insulting us or praising us, simply keeping indifferent on the issue would solve the problem. It is like Alphakx, your coworker, said:

"
People tend to get ahead of themselves at times, and that's only natural. The coincidences are strikingly similar to our website, and that is because we've seen many imitations in the past. Most of us are probably predisposed whenever we yet again see something that looks similar and familiar. It's really no big deal because it's just purely coincidental."

To me, and this is purely my opinion, so do not interpret it to me saying it is fact, this is the best way to go about such an issue. Perhaps in the future we can be more openminded to other groups who are not trying to steal your thunder, but rather provide a home for a different variety of artists in the community. I would love to move on from this with your respect, as you will still have mine. Note: again, this is not sucking up, or changing my opinions about you. I have always looked up to you and your site, as stated before, and that does not change because you do not give approval of our art group. It certainly causes me to question whether I agree with you or not, but it takes a lot for me to change my opinion of someone completely.

-sgen

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ekud In reply to S-Gen [2006-05-10 00:12:08 +0000 UTC]

Look man, all I said is that the site looks like a dc clone, and it does.

I've seen hundreds of these groups come and go.

Imagine if YOU had made something, and you'd seen it copied literally dozens of times in various formats.

You'd get sick of it after a while.

Now imagine that a member of one of these groups calls you audacious and arrogant for saying that his site (which is quite similar) is a copy.

You'd let him know that he's being a name-calling little bitch, wouldnt you?

Put yourself in my shoes.

And I have put myself in your shoes. I was in your shoes - I started a goddamned artgroup. I just made sure mine was a hell of a lot different to anyone elses.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S-Gen In reply to ekud [2006-05-10 02:39:08 +0000 UTC]

Well first of all, we did not copy you. It has similarities, yes, but it is nothing like a "clone". I can imagine your frustration with people trying to copy you, but then, if they are trying to copy you, then they won't have much success anyways, so it really shouldn't bother you. All we have is the same colors and partially the same layout. That is hardly copying. Influenced? yes. Keep also in mind that this was one person designing it, stormz, not any of us, so when we post a preview of our site, have it bashed, have our originality and talents questioned, and made fun of, WE get sick of it after a while.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ekud In reply to S-Gen [2006-05-10 02:44:06 +0000 UTC]

You're starting to annoy me now. I'm not interested in playing semantics over whether you were influenced or whether you imitated. Your originality obviously deserves to be questioned, because you have produced a site that is remarkably similar to ours.

Get off your high horse. ou didnt even design the site, stop wasting my goddamned time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S-Gen In reply to ekud [2006-05-10 04:18:12 +0000 UTC]

you don't have to read it if you're just going to get pissed. another sign of your ignorance: my post is "wasting (your) goddamned time".. like you are something special.

way to be.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ekud In reply to S-Gen [2006-05-10 06:00:56 +0000 UTC]

Ignorance or arrogance?

You are wasting my time, the same way I'm wasting yours - this conversation is getting us nowhere, and is wasting both of our time.

Let's let it drop, no? I understand where you are coming from, but you seem to be refusing to acknowledge my point, which is madenning because it is so simple.

And believe it or not, I have much better things to do than argue over the internet. As do you I presume. You don't need to be special to find conversations like this a waste of time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S-Gen In reply to ekud [2006-05-10 13:14:12 +0000 UTC]

lol yes i meant arrogance, it was late, and i can't edit posts :$. i see where you're coming from, but i just don't agree with you, and it's the same with you, so yes, i'll agree to disagree. arguing more won't solve anything.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

beaucoupzero [2006-05-06 02:19:51 +0000 UTC]

dude, why depthcoreΒ© man?why not deviantartΒ©?goolgleΒ©?windows xpΒ©?or even norton antivirusΒ©β„’? or maybe need for speedΒ©β„’ lol something, u all seem to have this fixation on dC, somesort of post-dC-rejectionβ„’* syndrome lol cuz if i look at the applications i think i ll find u all there...why man?why not using your own mind and create something fresh?again lol

beaucoupzeroΒ© alias z e r o o n e t h r e e aΒ©.

*i have a friend really skilled at these matters i ll ask him to
research this maybe we can get it in the books and win
the noble prize.

: (

fo` real

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SR-27 [2006-04-23 16:04:47 +0000 UTC]

yet another depthcore clone

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

044 In reply to SR-27 [2006-04-23 17:54:00 +0000 UTC]

Actually, once you see the layout, it looks nothing like dC. So don't judge us before you even see the whole thing. Its not even a 3-columned box layout like dC and KV...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

ravivasavan In reply to 044 [2006-05-05 15:12:39 +0000 UTC]

the 3 column style is ours yo', run in the different direction; plz. kthxbaii

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Genesis-Orbit In reply to ravivasavan [2006-05-05 16:15:20 +0000 UTC]

Hence why we aren't 3 column...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

ravivasavan In reply to Genesis-Orbit [2006-05-06 00:43:55 +0000 UTC]

but, it is 3 columned. are you sure you've been to a eye-specialist recently?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Genesis-Orbit In reply to ravivasavan [2006-05-06 00:47:41 +0000 UTC]

Indeed I haven't lol. Well.....we'll have something very special planned, come back here in a few months.
Perhaps we used the 3 colum style becuase it's easy, not becuase we are trying to copy off you?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ravivasavan In reply to Genesis-Orbit [2006-05-06 00:56:11 +0000 UTC]

slow progress, one of significant evidence of poor management that has infested oxygenetic and see what has happened to it. and tell me why should i be concerned about the surprise?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Genesis-Orbit In reply to ravivasavan [2006-05-06 01:05:43 +0000 UTC]

We're making a ton of progress, there's just a lot of it to go around. And concerned...well I would have chose a different word for this but let me just say this. Even if we don't think it looks like depthcore, the public does, and there's nothing we can do to change their opinions.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ravivasavan In reply to Genesis-Orbit [2006-05-06 00:40:29 +0000 UTC]

but, it is. =\

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

i-04 In reply to 044 [2006-04-25 12:51:48 +0000 UTC]

but dude that preview looks just like depthcore.. Every color+concept :/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

044 In reply to i-04 [2006-04-26 07:04:29 +0000 UTC]

Suit yourselves, but it doesn't look anything like it. Colors possibly but last I checked colors can't be owned..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

i-04 In reply to 044 [2006-04-26 08:43:57 +0000 UTC]

Yea, I cannot say it does, yet. I'm saying it looks like depthcore when I look those preview images. We'll see how much its dC after you open the site.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Genesis-Orbit In reply to i-04 [2006-05-06 00:50:01 +0000 UTC]

It's more evoke one than depthcore if it makes you feel any better lol. Come back to the site in a few months, you might like it then

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sick-Osiris [2006-04-23 12:23:28 +0000 UTC]

looks damn sweet. looking forward to it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fee1 [2006-04-22 15:55:15 +0000 UTC]

oh another one ... whats now the plan ? when the site will be released etc. ?
where i can get informations

as artpack member it would be nice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

044 In reply to fee1 [2006-04-23 23:46:21 +0000 UTC]

Hit me on MSN; ross.w9@gmail.com

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fee1 [2006-04-22 15:50:17 +0000 UTC]

sexy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Q-templates [2006-04-21 14:27:52 +0000 UTC]

DEPTHCORE?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rwalby9 In reply to Q-templates [2006-04-23 19:32:05 +0000 UTC]

last i checked...dC didn't own our layout, and they didn't copyright the colors black and grey..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kadafi [2006-04-20 17:21:22 +0000 UTC]

very nice work here

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S0-Fresh [2006-04-18 04:44:44 +0000 UTC]

aagh


sexehfied

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ZenkoAshikaga [2006-04-17 06:29:26 +0000 UTC]

Not fan of the colors since is pretty much whored but is cool.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SyndicDesigns [2006-04-17 04:19:32 +0000 UTC]

Ahhh
i feel like soeone is throwin monitors at me

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

static06 [2006-04-17 00:15:23 +0000 UTC]

*drools*

Cant wait still!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

7-dust [2006-04-16 17:22:10 +0000 UTC]

wow perfect!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ev4n [2006-04-16 08:53:40 +0000 UTC]

looks very depthcore

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S-Gen In reply to ev4n [2006-04-18 03:58:13 +0000 UTC]

stfu

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ev4n In reply to S-Gen [2006-04-18 15:08:26 +0000 UTC]

no?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Genesis-Orbit In reply to ev4n [2006-04-18 23:24:17 +0000 UTC]

It's just the thumbnails, I didn't think dc the first time i saw the whole thing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ev4n In reply to Genesis-Orbit [2006-04-19 09:19:08 +0000 UTC]

k fair enough

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S-Gen In reply to ev4n [2006-04-18 22:21:00 +0000 UTC]

yea?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ev4n In reply to S-Gen [2006-04-19 09:18:34 +0000 UTC]

no?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S-Gen In reply to ev4n [2006-04-20 03:11:01 +0000 UTC]

yes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>