HOME | DD

33k7 β€” USSA flag

Published: 2010-11-07 21:44:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 6432; Favourites: 73; Downloads: 3044
Redirect to original
Description United Socialist States of America flag

Fascism is capitalism in decay and socialism is Democracy in decay
Related content
Comments: 22

AshenGrungePunK999 [2023-07-04 02:51:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kurthutch74 [2015-03-22 03:19:57 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Dixie-Trixie In reply to kurthutch74 [2018-03-03 21:52:38 +0000 UTC]

Found the kid who rides the short bus to school every day.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vladtheheavy In reply to kurthutch74 [2017-09-03 20:31:21 +0000 UTC]

dude freedom of speech

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hellerick [2014-02-22 04:06:06 +0000 UTC]

Uhm, this flag looks strikingly similar to mine i.imgur.com/IgLnFkB.jpg

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

33k7 In reply to Hellerick [2014-02-22 16:57:40 +0000 UTC]

posted it here November 7, 2010 when was thatΒ posted

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hellerick In reply to 33k7 [2014-02-23 15:51:57 +0000 UTC]

Mine was in 2008: althistory.wikia.com/wiki/File…


Not trying to accuse anybody, it's just strange that such coincidences happen.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Valendale [2013-09-18 08:52:32 +0000 UTC]

Is that why Fascists historically killed socialists and purged them from the party, capturing socialist images purely for political use while being financed by capitalist industrialists as a preferable alternative to socialism, and why one of the core objectives of fascism was the preservation of class division and private property?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheElevatedDeviant [2012-12-12 22:01:03 +0000 UTC]

I retract my previous statement. Communism is socialism in decay. Democracy isn't a political party, per se- there can be democratic republics (example: England) and democratic socialist nations (example: Sweden).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheElevatedDeviant [2012-12-12 21:59:51 +0000 UTC]

Democracy is socialism in decay, more like.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

33k7 In reply to TheElevatedDeviant [2012-12-12 22:56:14 +0000 UTC]

I respectfully disagree

the principle of democracy and republics believe that people can govern themselves. Being allowed to vote for one's representation through multiple parties and candidates that share your beliefs. Multiple parties have less of a chance of being corrupted and with the exchange of beliefs and ideas will progress further than any single party state.

the principle of Socialism and Communism believe that the people cannot govern themselves. If they have an election is a shamor is a choice between Tweedledum and Tweedledee if you are under a total socialist or communist state example last century Cold War Communist states never had a free and open elections until after the wall came down. If you have a single party with a monopoly over the government like anything else it becomes stagnant and corrupt.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

AntonioFL In reply to 33k7 [2023-07-04 00:20:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheElevatedDeviant In reply to 33k7 [2012-12-12 23:54:57 +0000 UTC]

Ah, no. That "communist" description of yours is totalitarianism, which is the opposite of what Marx intended.
Socialism is all about the people governing themselves. Ideal socialism is when the people elect a governing council who are subject to public opinion. In a republic, a leader is elected, hardly the people governing themselves.
The so-called communist governments in the Soviet Union and North Korea are totalitarian, in the latter's case, fascist. China is capitalist, plain and simple.
Ideal socialism has taken root in countries such as Sweden, Norway, Germany, France and Finland.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

33k7 In reply to TheElevatedDeviant [2012-12-13 04:38:09 +0000 UTC]

I respectively disagree with that but thank you for the comment. This will turn into an argument. so I'm just going to follow the rule of friends that want to stay friends don't talk about politics and religion

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheElevatedDeviant In reply to 33k7 [2012-12-13 13:29:11 +0000 UTC]

You and I have very different "rules of friends". But I respect your wishes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fennomanic [2010-12-25 13:41:00 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sonrouge [2010-11-28 19:17:03 +0000 UTC]

Ain't gonna happen.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

33k7 In reply to sonrouge [2010-11-28 22:46:17 +0000 UTC]

better dead than red

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mdc01957 [2010-11-14 04:05:09 +0000 UTC]

Are you making a map of this?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

33k7 In reply to mdc01957 [2010-11-14 14:28:08 +0000 UTC]

yes!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mdc01957 In reply to 33k7 [2010-11-14 14:51:09 +0000 UTC]

Cool. Looking forward to it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pytko3 [2010-11-08 08:07:18 +0000 UTC]

Is this from the book, "Back in the USSA?"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

33k7 In reply to pytko3 [2010-11-08 15:09:45 +0000 UTC]

yes to the name. on to the world.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0