HOME | DD

AdamKop β€” Star Wars Incom fighters Descent

Published: 2013-02-24 23:26:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 27131; Favourites: 491; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description (image update for better color balance and more cohesive light/shadow work)

Render of two commissioned fighters made for

Links to the original ships renders:





If you're interested in commissions, please visit this page:

Sci-Fi 2D + 3D CommissionsHello, you arrived at my Commisions page If you are interested in getting a CGI image created for you, please continue to the section you are interested in. There are three sections: Section A for all kinds of 2D images Section B for various 3D renders Section C for blueprints and line art I do all kinds of art and I'm opened to different styles (vector drawings of a Star Wars ship, 3D render of a Stargate vehicle, blueprint for a Dune tank and of course every kindΒ Β of original universe objects and scenes) so don't be afraid to ask for what you want. You can also check examples of my commisioned work and private gallery works on the bottom of this entry. I am looking forward to working with you and seeing a happy finish Please note that preferably I accept paypal payments. You can also contact me at my email address at adamkopala145@gmail.com Here's a description of the process: Here are the prices of commissions, divided into three cathegories.

Related content
Comments: 57

AdamKop In reply to ??? [2013-02-25 08:12:11 +0000 UTC]

Ah it's my favourite as well

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Heretic1311 [2013-02-25 00:48:44 +0000 UTC]

Nice, i like this Duo!
Beware TIEs, now comes the X-Wing Family!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AdamKop In reply to Heretic1311 [2013-02-25 08:12:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks TIEs would probably just self destruct at that sight

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Heretic1311 In reply to AdamKop [2013-02-25 08:58:47 +0000 UTC]

I hope their pilots are not that suicidal...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AdamKop In reply to Heretic1311 [2013-02-25 09:38:32 +0000 UTC]

Going to a battle in a TIE is a suicide anyway

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Heretic1311 In reply to AdamKop [2013-02-25 10:04:40 +0000 UTC]

CanΒ΄t argue with that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |