HOME | DD

#dinosaurs #feathers #paleontology #scales #skin #tyrannosaur #tyrannosaurid #tyrannosauroid #tyrannosaurus #tyrannosauroidea #trexdinosaur
Published: 2016-03-15 04:35:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 6338; Favourites: 116; Downloads: 31
Redirect to original
Description
Numerous direct evidences of the skin coverings of various tyrannosaurs.A chart used in my most recent video concerning tyrannosaur integument: www.youtube.com/watch?v=uM5JN_…
Silhouettes created by Paleop , colored by me.
All sources can be found here:
z13.invisionfree.com/Hell_Cree…
Related content
Comments: 67
tigris115 [2017-11-05 02:22:34 +0000 UTC]
Apparently, RJ was told by some experts that tyrannosaurid feathers are somewhat unlikely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
12monkehs [2017-06-21 23:28:33 +0000 UTC]
Appearantly they were spikes. pterosaurnet.blogspot.com/2012…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
william023 [2017-03-24 14:53:08 +0000 UTC]
T.Rex is weird, like a mix and match critter, to quote TV tropes. Like the bastard child of an emu and a crocodilian, if it ate steroid cereal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Artapon [2016-09-23 11:11:21 +0000 UTC]
had scientist found quill nobs on the T-rex arms?
I mean is quill nobs is were the feather grow from?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aGentlemanScientist In reply to Artapon [2016-09-26 12:24:45 +0000 UTC]
The answer is no, tyrannosaur feathers weren't like those of modern birds and dromeaosaurs. They were most like those of emus and ostriches.
Not to mention, A lack of quill knobs does not mean the animal lacks feathers. Flamingos for example do not have quill knobs but obviously have feathers
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Artapon [2016-09-09 16:36:35 +0000 UTC]
Dilong feathered
Yutyrannus feathered
Gorgosaurus possibly feathered
Albertosaurus possibly feathered
the rest of the tyrannosaurs including t-rex do they have feather with no fossil evidance of them having feather don't say yes or no I say the real answer is uncertain.
I say until they find more specimens the question doe's t-rex have feathers is better off unanswered.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
aGentlemanScientist In reply to Artapon [2016-09-09 18:23:20 +0000 UTC]
Just because we do not have direct evidence, does not mean we should just assume it did not have feathers. All the current evidence from tyrannosaurs strongly suggests all were feathered.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aGentlemanScientist In reply to Artapon [2016-09-09 18:20:23 +0000 UTC]
You're right we don't know for certain, but the most plausible conclusion based on the evidence at hand is that T.rex did possess feathers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artapon In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-09-09 21:37:40 +0000 UTC]
but what if the answer show we made a mistake i mean all animals are different even to their cousins I mean the Asian rhinos have folds and don't see any folds on the the African rhinos, the Javan and Idian rhino had 1 horn and the black rhino, white rhino and Sumatran had one horn, the Sumatran rhino is hairy but not woolly like the woolly rhino and the other rhinos hardly got any fur.
what I mean to say is different species of the same family do not have some same things one is to adapted to your environment and the mager reason why they are different is to recognize your kind.
but which dinosaurs had feathers that an easy question to answer look at this upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia…
should we wait for the right answer when they find more specimens?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
aGentlemanScientist In reply to Artapon [2016-09-12 12:32:24 +0000 UTC]
Also you forget that all rhinos possess hair. With integument such as fur or feathers, in even distantly related organisms possess a similar skin covering simply with different distribution. The Wooly Rhino and the African Rhino might have a different distribution of hair, but nevertheless they have hair.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aGentlemanScientist In reply to Artapon [2016-09-12 12:29:14 +0000 UTC]
You can't just assume future undiscovered evidence will contradict the current most plausible skin covering.
By your logic, Dakotaraptor was discovered without a head; so should we just say we don't know if it had a head or not?
No, science works with what we got and if future evidence turns out to be wrong then we correct it.
"Should we wait for the right answer when they find more specimens?" We don't know if more specimens will ever be found. As said before, science works with what is currently available to reach a conclusion. What is most likely according to current evidence might not be what is with 100% certainty true, but we can't just assume that it is false without any basis to assume so.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artapon In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-09-12 15:59:45 +0000 UTC]
but it better not make a mistakes
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tidalwave21 In reply to Artapon [2016-09-25 03:41:26 +0000 UTC]
It's better to not leave it unanswered. Gravitate toward the more likely answer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Evodolka [2016-09-04 00:56:10 +0000 UTC]
cool i love tyrannosaurs and i love seeing their family tree layed out nice and simple like this
well done
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aGentlemanScientist In reply to Evodolka [2016-09-08 13:13:16 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! No problem
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Evodolka In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-09-08 14:47:13 +0000 UTC]
your welcome! and thanks its really appreciated
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RizkiusMaulanae [2016-08-31 08:56:13 +0000 UTC]
Hey trey, can I ask ?
If they've discovered feathers on the tail of yutyrannus and dilong, then why saurian's trex has naked scaly tail ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aGentlemanScientist In reply to RizkiusMaulanae [2016-08-31 11:29:11 +0000 UTC]
T.rex has a small patch of scales on the ventral part of its body. Other closely related Tyrannosaurs do as well. I recently learned that Yutyrannus has a small scale patch on the underside of its tail. Also many non-tyrannosaurid dinosaurs had scaled tails yet feathered bodies.
Saurian took all this evidence and found a middle ground.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RizkiusMaulanae In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-08-31 11:54:29 +0000 UTC]
Oh okay. Thanks for the info trey
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RizkiusMaulanae In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-09-11 12:51:59 +0000 UTC]
Hey Trey, I have another question.
Does tyrannosaurus has a fully naked scaly underbelly ? Or the chest is the only feathered part ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aGentlemanScientist In reply to RizkiusMaulanae [2016-09-12 12:54:45 +0000 UTC]
I believe the tail is the only fully scaly part of the body
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RizkiusMaulanae In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2017-04-10 03:23:24 +0000 UTC]
Hey I found an interesting article bonesharpesite.wordpress.com/2…
Any thoughts ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aGentlemanScientist In reply to TheGamingMaverick [2016-04-15 12:35:05 +0000 UTC]
No probs, I doubt it's 100% accurate, but it's the best I could do with such little data. hey are you the same TheGamingMaverick on Wikipedia giving misinfo?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheGamingMaverick In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-04-15 13:28:24 +0000 UTC]
No, I keep getting mistaken for him/her and it is starting to get really annoying. Although considering we both seem to like T. Rex I can understand the confusion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aGentlemanScientist In reply to TheGamingMaverick [2016-04-15 15:59:34 +0000 UTC]
Oh that stinks man, sorry to here that
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
lythronax-argestes In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-04-16 23:28:23 +0000 UTC]
It is the same guy, Trey. Just trolling. The "Godzillasaurus Rex" image on his profile is proof.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheGamingMaverick In reply to lythronax-argestes [2016-04-17 02:07:37 +0000 UTC]
Yeah that image is the one I use on my Facebook and the one I used to use for deviant art, but I don't even have Wikipedia account
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheGamingMaverick In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-04-16 02:11:15 +0000 UTC]
I just made a new account, doesn't really matter since I only made this one not that long ago
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aGentlemanScientist In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-04-15 15:59:49 +0000 UTC]
*hear not here
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kester14 [2016-03-30 13:15:33 +0000 UTC]
I think the skin of t-rex that was found could be a damaged tissue? is it wrong?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aGentlemanScientist In reply to Kester14 [2016-03-30 14:26:42 +0000 UTC]
We don't know, the skin still hasn't been formally published yet and is currently just here-say
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheDubstepAddict [2016-03-15 20:09:24 +0000 UTC]
Dang I loved this video, like, fav and comment.
Do you wanna join the Paleopack? A group of artists. We could help you with research for your vids and your fans don't have to wait long for the next one. We really want to support you in any way possible and it would be an honour to have you as an group member.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aGentlemanScientist In reply to TheDubstepAddict [2016-03-15 20:51:35 +0000 UTC]
Thank you and sure thing! that would be cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheDubstepAddict In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-03-16 06:03:57 +0000 UTC]
I'll send an invitation! Wait for it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bruiser128 [2016-03-15 15:06:31 +0000 UTC]
Didn't they recently discover a new tyrannosaurid recently?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lythronax-argestes In reply to bruiser128 [2016-03-15 19:34:33 +0000 UTC]
Tyrannosauroid, but yes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bruiser128 In reply to lythronax-argestes [2016-03-15 19:41:59 +0000 UTC]
I believe that it roughly matched the size of the largest carcharodontosauridea. You remember it's name?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lythronax-argestes In reply to bruiser128 [2016-03-16 04:44:52 +0000 UTC]
Timurlengia eurotica. Fairly small, actually.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lythronax-argestes In reply to bruiser128 [2016-03-17 02:36:25 +0000 UTC]
Horse-sized, as described by news releases. Comparatively small relative to carcharodontosaurs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HUBLERDON [2016-03-15 14:14:17 +0000 UTC]
So, Trey, what do you think is more likely? Feathered or bare calves and tail?
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
aGentlemanScientist In reply to HUBLERDON [2016-03-15 20:52:38 +0000 UTC]
I personally say it probably had bare featherless calves
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HUBLERDON In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-03-15 23:58:47 +0000 UTC]
What about the tail?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aGentlemanScientist In reply to HUBLERDON [2016-03-16 11:34:51 +0000 UTC]
Underside was undeniably scaly, upper side probably was feather
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HUBLERDON In reply to aGentlemanScientist [2016-03-16 22:15:50 +0000 UTC]
Like something on Saurian?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>