HOME | DD

alaska-is-a-husky — CoyWolves

Published: 2009-11-03 22:11:58 +0000 UTC; Views: 2834; Favourites: 40; Downloads: 28
Redirect to original
Description [link]

[link]
Related content
Comments: 84

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to ??? [2010-07-09 04:12:56 +0000 UTC]

According to wikipedia, coydogs are male coyote/female dog crosses and dogotes are the offspring of female coyotes/male dogs. I've never actually heard the latter term used before.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaptain-Kefiah In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2010-07-10 17:24:18 +0000 UTC]

ok.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Boverisuchus [2010-06-12 12:12:05 +0000 UTC]

I support it being a valid subspecies, your first link discusses that they seem to marginalise grey wolves. It is possible that the red wolf is the original american wolf, and that grey wolves evolved from them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nikkigamer [2010-02-06 23:39:22 +0000 UTC]

Very true I read it in a Biology book once.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Nikkigamer [2010-02-07 04:38:12 +0000 UTC]

That's awesome, I'd only seen it referenced in articles before.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kuwaizair [2009-11-06 17:31:51 +0000 UTC]

so its like a ligar but wild and a dog

I guess in heat is in heat, I thought wolves ate coyotes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Wolfwoman7 In reply to Kuwaizair [2010-01-05 04:05:36 +0000 UTC]

Lots of times they do, but as with anything, things can happen!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Kuwaizair [2009-11-06 18:02:14 +0000 UTC]

Wolf/dog and coyote/dog crosses can sometimes happen in the wild too. The wild parents are usually loners, and I suppose they'll take any chance to get their DNA into the next generation. From a biological standpoint it's better than leaving behind no offspring at all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kuwaizair In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-06 18:08:11 +0000 UTC]

yeah. someone once, for some reasion told me that dogs eat their hybreed offspring 0_o.

but cross breeding does seem to be why our coyotes are colorfull.
erh..half coyote?

the yellow wolf! NJ has yellowwolves! thats it. not wolf not coyote.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Kuwaizair [2009-11-06 18:18:53 +0000 UTC]

Sometimes coyotes are referred to as "brush wolves", heh. Don't think I've ever heard of a yellow wolf though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Wolfwoman7 In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2010-01-05 04:06:07 +0000 UTC]

They are referred to as brush wolves so people can sell them for more money.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Wolfwoman7 [2010-01-05 05:24:56 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I figured as much... Or so that the listing pops up when people search for real wolves.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kuwaizair In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-06 18:29:55 +0000 UTC]

shhhh new species. I discoverd it/renamed the blond coyotes. XD

[link] what is wrong with its ears? super poof, on the outside. like VK's creations.

I have a coyote. its empty though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Kuwaizair [2009-11-06 22:11:21 +0000 UTC]

Maybe one of his parents was a long haired German shepherd or a Belgian shepherd? He's still growing into his adult coat :>

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wolfforce58 In reply to ??? [2009-11-04 21:46:01 +0000 UTC]

While reading some scientific articles for my Natural Resources something or other class (lol, all I know is NRPI 103...never bothered to remember the full title) term paper I remember reading an article that discussed the possibility that red wolves were just coyote-wolf hybrids (it referred to other articles, maybe even the ones you have cited here), but then it referred to other ones that disproved it. As a matter of fact, there was even evidence that suggested red wolves were actually the STOCK of modern day coyote and grey wolf populations.

So, I can't say I technically believe this stamp....lol. Either way, if the species was doing fine and had enough individuals (thousands...they had some number in the high thousands before settlers came in and ruined their habitat) that were similar or basically identical as a species then they deserve to be protected. Man has caused extinction rates to go from (assuming there are 10,000,000 different species) ~5 species going extinct per year to ~27,000 a year....so yeah...we should protect all we can! lol We kinda f*ed up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to wolfforce58 [2009-11-04 23:06:48 +0000 UTC]

We truly have done a world of damage...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Wolfwoman7 In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2010-01-05 04:04:51 +0000 UTC]

And always will.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wolfforce58 In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-05 01:33:29 +0000 UTC]

I'd say so...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fuzzysheepy In reply to ??? [2009-11-03 22:14:02 +0000 UTC]

that fact that you have proof makes this even better

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Fuzzysheepy [2009-11-03 22:20:34 +0000 UTC]

I have a couple of other links too if anybody feels like arguing. Of course, they're still viewed as a separate species and as such are protected for being "endangered".

I mean, just look at them. They look like overgrown coyotes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Kuwaizair In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-06 17:35:42 +0000 UTC]

someone had a thing to teach how to tell the differance

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fuzzysheepy In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-03 22:25:04 +0000 UTC]

pffhaha
good riddance if they do go exinct.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Wolfwoman7 In reply to Fuzzysheepy [2009-11-03 23:02:18 +0000 UTC]

I don't think that's up to us, we're the ones that fucked everything up in the first place.

I don't agree with the reintroduction program entirely, but since when did we become GOD in determining what species could live or die to extinction. We are arrogance at our best.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NoRFairs98 In reply to Wolfwoman7 [2010-01-05 03:45:25 +0000 UTC]

*sighs*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wolfwoman7 In reply to NoRFairs98 [2010-01-05 04:04:18 +0000 UTC]

Yes?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NoRFairs98 In reply to Wolfwoman7 [2010-01-05 04:20:00 +0000 UTC]

it seems wrong

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wolfwoman7 In reply to NoRFairs98 [2010-01-05 04:39:09 +0000 UTC]

It seems wrong about which thing?

That we messed it up? Of course that's wrong

That we think we're God? That's MORE than wrong.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NoRFairs98 In reply to Wolfwoman7 [2010-01-05 04:42:45 +0000 UTC]

no...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wolfwoman7 In reply to NoRFairs98 [2010-01-05 05:03:37 +0000 UTC]

LOL You're not much of a conversationalist are ya! lol I'm not going to jump down your throat if that's why you're not replying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NoRFairs98 In reply to Wolfwoman7 [2010-01-05 05:08:26 +0000 UTC]

i guess...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Fuzzysheepy [2009-11-03 22:26:30 +0000 UTC]

We could always just make more.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Kuwaizair In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-06 17:58:27 +0000 UTC]

[link]

looks like they did it alredy

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fuzzysheepy In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-03 22:30:21 +0000 UTC]

god no

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |