HOME | DD

alaska-is-a-husky — Gray Wolves Are Not Endangered

Published: 2009-10-10 22:50:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 16095; Favourites: 287; Downloads: 61
Redirect to original
Description They aren't.

Love the comments guys, keep 'em coming.
Related content
Comments: 812

Ellyrox59 In reply to ??? [2009-12-19 00:56:32 +0000 UTC]

-not fighing you on this-

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WolfehLova19 In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-12-19 00:57:35 +0000 UTC]

Who says we were fighting? We were just clearly stating facts ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ellyrox59 In reply to WolfehLova19 [2009-12-19 04:08:00 +0000 UTC]

Wrong facts

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

AndyMagnuseth In reply to Ellyrox59 [2011-01-19 01:51:58 +0000 UTC]

[link]

Clearly there is no such thing as a "Wrong" fact.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WolfehLova19 In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-12-19 04:09:52 +0000 UTC]

Who's? Yours?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to ??? [2009-10-10 22:51:47 +0000 UTC]

No, they are not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ellyrox59 In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-10-10 22:52:29 +0000 UTC]

They maybe not be on the endangered list, but they are endangered

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

XCali-CatX In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-10-10 22:55:22 +0000 UTC]

i know right this person nuts check dis out there is only about 8000 in the world and [link] its right there on the list

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

LoboSabio In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-23 23:29:13 +0000 UTC]

8000? Are you mental? There are about 7000-11000 wolves in Alaska alone!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XCali-CatX In reply to LoboSabio [2009-10-24 02:25:40 +0000 UTC]

yeah i know right its a certain type i was talking about umm red wolves very low amount and ..... GO WOLVES THAT DUDE IS AND A**

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LoboSabio In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-24 04:04:11 +0000 UTC]

Even then you're still waaaay off the mark. There are roughly 100 red wolves in the wild at the moment, making them one of the rarest canids in the world.

Also: if you're going to continue crusading for wolves, I would suggest you take the time to educate yourself about them. Ignorant sympathy is the last thing the wolf needs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XCali-CatX In reply to LoboSabio [2009-10-24 04:28:24 +0000 UTC]

yeah umm i did a large report on them and there are 1100 in existence and they realy shouldn't have taken them of the endangered species list

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

MurphysLawl In reply to XCali-CatX [2010-05-28 04:32:03 +0000 UTC]

HAHAHA. Wow, it's like you're fucking /five/.
Do your research on places OTHER than Wikipedia and forty-year-old text books, sweetie.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fhareli In reply to MurphysLawl [2010-09-08 23:11:02 +0000 UTC]

i lol'ed.
true, true.
i'm usually all for people arguing for a cause until they start acting like they're 4.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MurphysLawl In reply to Fhareli [2010-09-09 23:01:06 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. I generally will agree to disagree, but when someone's got their facts all wrong or completely ass-backwards, I just have to draw the line.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LoboSabio In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-24 05:17:32 +0000 UTC]

Oh dear...

You really don't know what you're talking about, do you? At present the gray wolf population in the United States is roughly 6200, not counting Alaska, which would add another 7000-11000. That's also not counting the 60 individual population of Mexican Wolves down in Arizona.

As for the red wolves, the population is still quite small, around 100 individuals.

I suggest you go back and recheck your sources.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XCali-CatX In reply to LoboSabio [2009-10-24 05:18:39 +0000 UTC]

i was talking about red wolves

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LoboSabio In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-24 05:21:55 +0000 UTC]

As was I, if you bothered to read the comment. Did you not see the statement which said, "As for the red wolves, the population is still quite small, around 100 individuals."?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XCali-CatX In reply to LoboSabio [2009-10-24 05:27:29 +0000 UTC]

thats in the wild in total about 1000

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LoboSabio In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-24 05:29:36 +0000 UTC]

So there are around 900 red wolves in captivity? I find this very hard to believe. Got any sources?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ellyrox59 In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-10 22:56:53 +0000 UTC]

I know! they need to be put back on the list so stupid hunters dont kill them!

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

Athazagoraphobias In reply to Ellyrox59 [2010-01-21 05:06:54 +0000 UTC]

Excuse me, but just by being put on an endangered species list doesn't change anything. Hunters hunt whatever the hell they want to regardless of a species' conservation status.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

daanzi In reply to Athazagoraphobias [2010-02-17 23:31:36 +0000 UTC]

...uh, no hunters do not hunt whatever the hell they want regardless of a species conservation status -POACHERS- do that... there is a difference.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-10-10 23:07:32 +0000 UTC]

Bawwwww.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

XCali-CatX In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-10-10 22:58:54 +0000 UTC]

they are on da list

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ellyrox59 In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-10 23:00:23 +0000 UTC]

No they were taken off... but they need to be put back on

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XCali-CatX In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-10-10 23:02:08 +0000 UTC]

then y is it on the fish and wildlife services list?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ellyrox59 In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-10 23:03:35 +0000 UTC]

Idk

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XCali-CatX In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-10-10 23:04:20 +0000 UTC]

yeah well they are threatend in some places and endangered in other now

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ellyrox59 In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-10 23:04:55 +0000 UTC]

yeah

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XCali-CatX In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-10-10 23:08:54 +0000 UTC]

he is and

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ellyrox59 In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-10 23:09:57 +0000 UTC]

read his last comment to me, gawd what a....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XCali-CatX In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-10-10 23:13:23 +0000 UTC]

ok and u can curse u know

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ellyrox59 In reply to XCali-CatX [2009-10-10 23:14:49 +0000 UTC]

oh yay

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XCali-CatX In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-10-10 23:16:08 +0000 UTC]

yeah

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Ellyrox59 [2009-10-10 22:55:20 +0000 UTC]

So you get to decide what is and what is not endangered?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Giggarex In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2010-07-13 23:48:37 +0000 UTC]

I was surprised you didn't mention something like this.

"Actually hunters can hunt endangered animals to with some pretty expensive permits though. Elephant hunts as well as big cat hunts for example still exist (you can find HD pictures no less)"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ellyrox59 In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-10-10 22:56:27 +0000 UTC]

They are endangered, they were taken off the list just so stupid hunters can shoot em. They need to be put back on!

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

firwstarroxx In reply to Ellyrox59 [2011-03-16 00:12:33 +0000 UTC]

god u are a wolfaboo

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

triippyx In reply to Ellyrox59 [2010-01-13 20:12:10 +0000 UTC]

You realize that wolves are doing massive damage to livestock animals?
THATS why people are allowed to hunt them in Idaho now, because they are fucking with peoples livelihood.
Stop being brainwashed by defenders of wildlife.
Rattlesnakes are facing more of a threat (of rattlesnake roundups)than these damned wolves are. You probably don't even know what that shit is, because you're all caught up in this prowolf bullshit.
Idiots like you are the reason people are starting to not like wolves, because you treat them like fucking gods, they aren't. They'd fucking eat you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 6

firwstarroxx In reply to triippyx [2011-03-16 00:13:15 +0000 UTC]

no not really

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

triippyx In reply to firwstarroxx [2011-03-16 00:26:32 +0000 UTC]

Not really what?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

firwstarroxx In reply to triippyx [2011-03-16 00:29:04 +0000 UTC]

not many wolves hunt lives stock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

triippyx In reply to firwstarroxx [2011-03-16 00:44:22 +0000 UTC]

You care to try and back that up or are you just going to bring up the same crap countless wolfaboos have told me before?

I suppose you also think wolves only kill the weak, sick or old, and only kill what they need too right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

firwstarroxx In reply to triippyx [2011-03-16 01:02:42 +0000 UTC]

UM NO EXCUSE ME BUT I AM NOT A WOLFABOO. Wolves do kill cattle but not constantly. Its not like they kill the entire herd of cows.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

triippyx In reply to firwstarroxx [2011-03-16 01:10:13 +0000 UTC]

Surplus killing, dear. Look it up. Of course they don't kill them constantly, though the thing is they don't need to look at livestock as prey at all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

firwstarroxx In reply to triippyx [2011-03-16 01:20:46 +0000 UTC]

I know the wolves kill insticnt goes into over drive when it sees the slow and trapped cattle every where

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

triippyx In reply to firwstarroxx [2011-03-16 01:28:50 +0000 UTC]

So that makes it okay?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

firwstarroxx In reply to triippyx [2011-03-16 01:31:05 +0000 UTC]

no did i say it was okay? <<

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

triippyx In reply to firwstarroxx [2011-03-16 01:33:33 +0000 UTC]

No but you kind of suck at making valid points so...yeah.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>