HOME | DD

alaska-is-a-husky — Stop Smudge Tool Abuse

Published: 2009-11-02 00:23:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 8715; Favourites: 218; Downloads: 67
Redirect to original
Description Please, think of the smudge tool.
Related content
Comments: 93

vql [2009-11-19 21:17:16 +0000 UTC]

I use just a little smudge. Usually when drawing fur, to smoothen out the scribbled stuff, and that's it. Oh, sometimes I use it for blending the shading, since blur doesn't work good for me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to vql [2009-11-28 03:02:52 +0000 UTC]

It is a useful tool when used properly

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

vql In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-28 11:07:40 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, but if it's overused, the truth in this stamp. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jayfeather3 [2009-11-07 17:25:09 +0000 UTC]


True, but if you use it right on fur it'll look nice. Dodge and burn is harrdddd.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BatmanWithBunnyEars [2009-11-07 02:00:01 +0000 UTC]

I agree with this and your dodge and burn stamp. I draw pixelated images in MS Paint, and I don't anti-alias, mostly due to laziness. In any case, I downloaded a photoshop trial and tried to use those tools to smooth out my pixelation, and it totally looked like shit. I was better off leaving it the way it was! Those tools suck.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ekuhikaarme [2009-11-03 20:15:08 +0000 UTC]

I use the different kinds of brush tools, hardly ever use the smudge tool unless I'm feeling lazy, lol which is usually when I'm using guidelines (like line art)

stamp is win.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CurlyHairedDemon In reply to ??? [2009-11-02 19:04:34 +0000 UTC]

I only use smudge when making metallic surfaces, but I am guilty of burn and dodge rapism (which isn't a word, apparently)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to CurlyHairedDemon [2009-11-02 20:14:55 +0000 UTC]

When used properly these tools can have some nice effects, but way too many people rely on them exclusively for shading or rendering fur without realizing how tacky it makes the final result look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Erathehedgehog In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2010-06-19 20:40:16 +0000 UTC]

So how do you know if when using the burn and dodge tool it just doesn't work? Li it murder's your picture. Because I just now noticed stamps on don't abuse this and that. And I don;t know whne I'm abusing and not. D:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Erathehedgehog [2010-06-22 00:55:55 +0000 UTC]

Basically you've used it too much when your shadows and highlights look "unnatural". If you're not certain try either asking for critiques or looking up some shading tutorials, there are some good ones here on DA that don't use the dodge/burn tool at all that I would recommend.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Erathehedgehog In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2010-06-22 00:57:49 +0000 UTC]

Ok thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CurlyHairedDemon In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-02 20:25:38 +0000 UTC]

I do dislike it when people blur for any reason but blending colors. If the lines aren't crisp, I think it takes away from the artwork.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lovelystamps [2009-11-02 00:25:32 +0000 UTC]

The smudge too... makes pictures look like shit. And so does dodge/burn abuse.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to Lovelystamps [2009-11-02 00:39:28 +0000 UTC]

I was just about to do one for dodge and burn.
Been seeing too many poorly done tutorials encouraging Photoshop abuse lately >:C

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darkclaw-moonfeather In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-02 00:44:48 +0000 UTC]

Here's one with smudge and burn: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to darkclaw-moonfeather [2009-11-02 00:52:52 +0000 UTC]

I commented on their "updated" tutorial a while back- politely, even! They flipped a shit and hid the comments, heh. I'm pretty sure all I told them was that there are better, more professional ways of rendering fur.

Nothing screams "I DON'T KNOW HOW TO USE PHOTOSHOP" like excessive dodge/burn/smudge tool use, followed closely by the lense flare and the grass brush.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-04 20:08:50 +0000 UTC]

they Flipped a shit?
PFFT more like YOU flipped a shit

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

darkclaw-moonfeather In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-05 17:26:15 +0000 UTC]

Oh, and I saw those comments.
She probably burst into tears at the very thought of somebody not patting her ass

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-04 23:03:02 +0000 UTC]

Lulz.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-04 23:06:17 +0000 UTC]

I mark thee Husky

TROLL

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-04 23:11:47 +0000 UTC]

Are you just figuring this out?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Skartte In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2011-01-08 00:59:54 +0000 UTC]

The above conversation had me rolling. Even if it was from a year ago.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DecepticonBarricade In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-04 23:17:48 +0000 UTC]

No ive BEEN figured this out

Go back to raping women and the english Language

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

darkclaw-moonfeather In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-04 23:59:54 +0000 UTC]

Bahahaha. Hahaha. Haha.

Wow. Oh man. If anybody needs an encyclopedia dramatica page it's you, because this shit is gold. Do you think that being a "proud supporter of ED" makes you an internet tough guy and gives you the right to be a total fucking tool?

Go back to humping cars.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to darkclaw-moonfeather [2009-11-05 00:02:31 +0000 UTC]

Nice comment

Still aint affected

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darkclaw-moonfeather In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-05 00:07:45 +0000 UTC]

Probably from huffing exhaust fumes all day
Get your head out of your (and =KITTmaster 's) tail pipe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to darkclaw-moonfeather [2009-11-05 00:10:34 +0000 UTC]

Still not impressed

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darkclaw-moonfeather In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-05 00:14:57 +0000 UTC]

Is this your only comeback?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to darkclaw-moonfeather [2009-11-05 00:19:44 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the reply!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darkclaw-moonfeather In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-05 00:22:24 +0000 UTC]

Aw, you poor thing. You've given up way too easily

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to darkclaw-moonfeather [2009-11-05 00:24:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the reply!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darkclaw-moonfeather In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-05 00:24:54 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the reply!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to darkclaw-moonfeather [2009-11-05 00:29:20 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the reply!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-04 23:32:13 +0000 UTC]

Funny you should talk about raping the English language...

Also, I seriously just laughed out loud. Congratulations, it takes a lot to get me to do that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-04 23:40:57 +0000 UTC]

*Documents all lulzy Conversation for further lulz and eventual ED use*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-04 23:50:56 +0000 UTC]

That would be one hell of a boring ED article.
You've earned yourself a spot on my front page, by the way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-04 23:54:03 +0000 UTC]

THATS SO AWSOME /sarcasm

i dont give a shit

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-04 23:55:29 +0000 UTC]

I find that hard to believe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-04 23:59:13 +0000 UTC]

XD
Go on try and send your NON existing fan base
Moar lulz to spread then >

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-05 00:04:08 +0000 UTC]

For somebody with a "non existing fan base" I somehow seem to have more watchers than you :>

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DecepticonBarricade In reply to alaska-is-a-husky [2009-11-05 00:06:38 +0000 UTC]

*looks at watch*
Wow im sooo impressed [/sarcasm]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alaska-is-a-husky In reply to DecepticonBarricade [2009-11-05 00:44:53 +0000 UTC]

Someday you'll grow up and realize just how lame that was.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |