HOME | DD

Published: 2009-07-12 10:51:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 99131; Favourites: 1210; Downloads: 1765
Redirect to original
Description
Highly experimental, fluid, high speed: 1/10'000th of a second photography.Director:
Vitaly S Alexius
Models:
LaVRA
Vivien H
Hair styling by:
The Trichome Evolution
Studio assistant:
Chico
3 cameras, 3 speedlights, one reflector, one water-proofed studio.
Related content
Comments: 138
Sandy33311 In reply to ??? [2009-07-12 23:24:36 +0000 UTC]
Ooops, you didn't call him your Lord!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
billndrsn [2009-07-12 11:14:03 +0000 UTC]
This is real art! It has many ways of being interpreted. Luv this series...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sushimitzu [2009-07-12 11:07:32 +0000 UTC]
What's with those shots lately? Where did your real art go? >_>
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Sushimitzu In reply to MoonlitCrescent [2009-07-12 16:13:40 +0000 UTC]
No, really. I don't like those.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MoonlitCrescent In reply to Sushimitzu [2009-07-12 17:55:20 +0000 UTC]
I get that. In some ways I agree. I'm still not convinced he isn't manipulating the water afterwards. But he's doing it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MoonlitCrescent In reply to Sushimitzu [2009-07-13 03:55:08 +0000 UTC]
Because some of the shapes and placement seem to good or perfect to be true.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sushimitzu In reply to MoonlitCrescent [2009-07-17 11:10:47 +0000 UTC]
You just usually don't see those with your eyes, that's why they seem so.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MoonlitCrescent In reply to Sushimitzu [2009-07-17 12:10:09 +0000 UTC]
Yes, and recently he told me that he only posts roughly one in every 500 pictures he takes, because of the shapes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ales-kotnik In reply to Sushimitzu [2009-07-12 11:12:55 +0000 UTC]
like this isn't art or worth posting?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sushimitzu In reply to ales-kotnik [2009-07-12 16:16:45 +0000 UTC]
Of course it's art. But still everyone has his own likings.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
alexiuss In reply to Sushimitzu [2009-07-12 11:11:48 +0000 UTC]
I'm trying something new.
Real art didn't go anywhere, I'm releasing it like usual, just putting up more photos.
see there's some paintings for this month:
[link]
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
mindlessbutterhead In reply to alexiuss [2009-07-14 04:31:38 +0000 UTC]
Real art didn't go anywhere? *shrugs*
I would think that digital art has more potential than photography.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alexiuss In reply to mindlessbutterhead [2009-07-14 04:45:32 +0000 UTC]
it's also very, very bad for my health
so, I'm switching to more photography until further notice
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mindlessbutterhead In reply to alexiuss [2009-07-14 15:31:40 +0000 UTC]
Ah, that's right, I remember you having some hand complication -- probably not too great on the eyes either. =] Well, best of luck, no matter what art genre you choose to pursue!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LearningEverMore In reply to mindlessbutterhead [2011-03-18 04:20:01 +0000 UTC]
not wanting to make any enemies, but either way, photography and digital art are both REAL art, just like writing a song or a poem,
but as I wanted to say, Alexiuss excels at any kind of REAl art from what I've seen
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sushimitzu In reply to alexiuss [2009-07-12 16:17:38 +0000 UTC]
Yea, I saw already. But oh well, kay then.
I'm glad you actually replied, buttery lord.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kevinli3993 [2009-07-12 11:05:15 +0000 UTC]
Yea I agree with Sam... The other couple of works was also amazing, must have took you a long time to make the water look like the way it should ><
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
samborek [2009-07-12 10:59:44 +0000 UTC]
it looks great
I'm still wondering how do you manipulate this fluid ;D
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alexiuss In reply to samborek [2009-07-12 11:06:36 +0000 UTC]
I don't.
I just throw it in the air, it manipulates itself
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
samborek In reply to alexiuss [2009-07-12 11:13:54 +0000 UTC]
hmm so you have to try many times sometime :]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EivindHansen In reply to ??? [2009-07-12 10:58:32 +0000 UTC]
Shockingly stunning! I love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
QuintonCharles In reply to ??? [2009-07-12 10:55:50 +0000 UTC]
I would definately not be able to keep my eyes open.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alexiuss In reply to QuintonCharles [2009-07-12 11:14:38 +0000 UTC]
you've no idea how many tries it takes because models close their eyes or blink!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
PixelMeThis In reply to alexiuss [2009-07-13 02:08:34 +0000 UTC]
How long does it take to reset the shot?
I can imagine at some point you're dealing with some annoyed wet models.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alexiuss In reply to PixelMeThis [2009-07-13 02:15:57 +0000 UTC]
minimum 30 seconds between each photo, more if focus is lost
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dullface [2009-07-12 10:54:40 +0000 UTC]
I like these things a lot, reminds me of that guy that played with milk too. I still don't get how the hell it's done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |