HOME | DD

Published: 2008-09-27 00:57:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 820; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description
Cover art of Shaman King volume 13.Related content
Comments: 24
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Arthur-Ramsey [2013-01-10 08:08:07 +0000 UTC]
It got deleted off zerochan, apparently it was low-quality.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arthur-Ramsey In reply to amaranthine-eternity [2013-01-10 13:07:54 +0000 UTC]
It happens to us all I have had work get declined and then have another upper high quality group in the same day come to me and want the same image in their gallery. Who is right? Well we all have different perceptions and there were many people who rejected the work of Mozart as well in his time. You keep being you and make what you like and if you like it then the piece is a success.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Arthur-Ramsey [2013-01-10 13:34:38 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much! And I agree, what is "bad" can also change as fashion changed. *cough* vampire romance *cough*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arthur-Ramsey In reply to amaranthine-eternity [2013-01-10 13:37:31 +0000 UTC]
Yes that is one of things that is hard as an artist you put a lot of work in something the end result is good and it is then rejected or unseen. Story of my life really but learning to just keep moving forward regardless. It is a great image in my book friend.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Arthur-Ramsey [2013-01-10 13:47:04 +0000 UTC]
I'm kinda used to rejection (ala publishing companies), but it's still painful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arthur-Ramsey In reply to amaranthine-eternity [2013-01-10 13:54:17 +0000 UTC]
You know the other thing is there really are people doing the job of editing and who really are not artists. I can't count the times I have had people come and offer an unsolicited critique and then go to there DA page and from their work it appears they have no concept of what I am doing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Arthur-Ramsey [2013-01-10 13:59:12 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I recently asked someone's opinion on a synopsis I wrote, and she waxed poetic about the difficulties of writing and how I should never give up-the bog standard response of any "writer" who has no idea what they're talking about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arthur-Ramsey In reply to amaranthine-eternity [2013-01-10 14:04:03 +0000 UTC]
Yes and don't even get me started on the DD system on DA. I have seen ink blobs get DDs literally. So again just do what makes you happy and be your own worst critic but when you have something your finally happy with then do the and move on to the next project.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Arthur-Ramsey [2013-01-10 14:09:00 +0000 UTC]
Oh, DD, well people reccomend their friends, who reccomend them. And unless you're really popular, they won't consider anyone outside of that group. I will, and I really don't expect to get faves, hits or comments, so it's a nice bonus whenn it happens.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fluffy-Spindleshanks [2008-12-02 04:40:07 +0000 UTC]
You can never have too many copies of this picture! Faving...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Fluffy-Spindleshanks [2009-02-10 02:45:54 +0000 UTC]
Oh, thanx!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fluffy-Spindleshanks In reply to amaranthine-eternity [2009-02-10 05:56:43 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Fluffy-Spindleshanks [2009-02-11 23:16:23 +0000 UTC]
I miss you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fluffy-Spindleshanks In reply to amaranthine-eternity [2009-02-12 04:32:19 +0000 UTC]
I miss you too. I sent you a couple of funny emails. I hope you find them funny.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Fluffy-Spindleshanks [2009-02-17 02:29:10 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, but one of them didn't work, which sucked ass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fluffy-Spindleshanks In reply to amaranthine-eternity [2009-02-17 04:54:58 +0000 UTC]
Sometimes that happens. Sorry about that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Fluffy-Spindleshanks [2009-02-18 02:24:57 +0000 UTC]
*sniff*. I'll live...barely
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fluffy-Spindleshanks In reply to amaranthine-eternity [2009-02-18 05:24:03 +0000 UTC]
There there...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Fluffy-Spindleshanks [2009-02-19 02:06:14 +0000 UTC]
Nah, I just try not to get too obsessed over anything nowadays... Are we still talking about the same thing?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fluffy-Spindleshanks In reply to amaranthine-eternity [2009-02-19 05:03:01 +0000 UTC]
I don't know...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Fluffy-Spindleshanks [2009-02-27 03:24:46 +0000 UTC]
Yawn. I'm sleepy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
amaranthine-eternity In reply to Fluffy-Spindleshanks [2009-02-11 23:10:05 +0000 UTC]
I miss you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0