HOME | DD

Published: 2007-11-25 00:19:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 5231; Favourites: 39; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
!!!!a male nude now!
still joking!
Related content
Comments: 26
kunst1963 [2023-05-22 22:52:22 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kunst1963 [2023-04-23 07:45:51 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Amplexus59 In reply to stephaniesame7 [2021-05-22 18:12:54 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
triplikeido69 [2008-06-07 11:54:25 +0000 UTC]
uh hmm. uhm.. hmm.. ...okaaay... well.. ok im speechless i dont know where to begin a smokin penis? im not a criitic or a fan but i just cant figure out how to comment/approach this..
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
MysBritt [2007-12-07 05:04:48 +0000 UTC]
lol
this is rather ugly but also funny coz its what they do to se if you are impotent? (to see if the man is capable of an unconscious erection you put tape like that around it while hes asleep
if in the morning it opened...he's ok)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
analease [2007-11-26 04:55:54 +0000 UTC]
That is one ugly shot of the male genitals, Looks like a small wrinkled prune
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
chriscrossxyz In reply to analease [2007-11-26 16:00:33 +0000 UTC]
Some people's concept of beauty differs from your own. If you looked at the vast majority of body types and physical forms out there you'll find very few match those as idealized in pornography or high art depictions of the body.
Often the artist isn't aiming to satisfy your narcissistic ideals of normality and beauty. You might want to reconsider that statement or find a different site to hang out in. Anyway I recognize your name and to be honest your comment isn't surprising. to you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Nazo-The-Unsolvable In reply to chriscrossxyz [2010-05-27 22:27:53 +0000 UTC]
Concept of beauty differs, yes; but I have to agree, this isn't a good shot. But then again, foreskin isn't really that pleasing to the eye for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
analease In reply to chriscrossxyz [2007-11-26 17:15:33 +0000 UTC]
BLAH BLAH BLAH. That sums up what you said. And the shot still sucks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chriscrossxyz In reply to analease [2007-11-26 19:34:04 +0000 UTC]
Never were one for intelligent dialogue were you? How do you kids get past the mature content block anyway?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
analease In reply to chriscrossxyz [2007-11-27 02:34:05 +0000 UTC]
You have the nerve to talk about intelligence? You cannot expect anyone to think your anything more then the most moronic person walking the face of this earth ( If you walk, snakes usually slither along) By the way is that avatar a picture of yourself? That stripe of bristle on that head is just perfect for wiping ass. HaHa, What an asswipe!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
chriscrossxyz In reply to analease [2007-11-27 04:15:36 +0000 UTC]
You have the nerve to talk about intelligence
+
HaHa, What an asswipe!!
Does anyone else find this ironic?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
analease In reply to chriscrossxyz [2007-11-27 17:22:21 +0000 UTC]
Great Comeback. Probably took you two or three hours to come up with that one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chriscrossxyz In reply to chriscrossxyz [2007-11-26 16:01:12 +0000 UTC]
That said, I agree... it's just another dick shot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
losen [2007-11-25 14:46:17 +0000 UTC]
You have a point there AximusKall. Im not very interested in looking at dick, but im not rude because of that. LOL! @ kultarr... Isn't art about experimenting, do something new and play with the viewers thoughts? Amplexus59 even made you post a comment...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AximusKall [2007-11-25 12:03:23 +0000 UTC]
While i don't find this extremely 'artistic'. What i find amusing is if it were a straight up, full-frontal picture of a vagina, there would be no complaints, and probably a bonus of comments about how good it is.
But because its just a penis, all the guys that are surfing the sub-section looking for naked women run face first into a naked penis are not offended, and the absolutely authority on what is, or isn't 'art'.
This actually follows all the required rules for 'artistic nude' while there are a LOT of picture of FEMALE nudes out there in worse positions - all-but pornographic - that people laud as paragons of art and beauty that break most of the rules, but are considered great works. But a shot of a penis that isnt breaking those same rules is criticized.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
chriscrossxyz In reply to AximusKall [2007-11-26 15:57:55 +0000 UTC]
Actually I criticize both equally. So that's an unfair assessment. Maybe it just highlights that the main audience of the Artistic Nude gallery is perverted guys?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Amplexus59 In reply to AximusKall [2007-11-25 22:46:43 +0000 UTC]
ART concept is an old discussion theme... and DA policy about nudity and erotic items as well...
Some time ago I've posted a journal entry about it and I found the statement of ~arealitystudios the more appropriate to expresse what I think about it: [link]
Thank you for your comment and support!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kultarr [2007-11-25 10:04:40 +0000 UTC]
oh god, if you think that's artistic nude your wrong. Perhaps you could get some ideas if you look at others work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
greenmoon71 [2007-11-25 09:48:07 +0000 UTC]
that's not a male nude you idiot
it's only your dick
👍: 0 ⏩: 0