HOME | DD

Published: 2017-01-29 21:47:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 6580; Favourites: 75; Downloads: 107
Redirect to original
Description
What if the Pennsylvania Railroad had introduced superpower locomotives to their roster? These are a P1 Class from a K4 with an extended firebox. The U1 came from a J1 with a shorter frame with a belpaire firebox. R3s were the first 4-8-4s on the PRR. More joined the class when several T1s were converted to make the R4s.The inspiration for these were from www.karenparker.net/PixelMagic… suggested by mrbill6ishere
Hope you enjoy!
Related content
Comments: 20
UPSteam [2017-09-21 15:04:25 +0000 UTC]
Technically, the Pennsy T1's would be considered a Super Powered locomotive since it was a 4-4-4-4.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mrbill6ishere [2017-07-05 17:29:43 +0000 UTC]
What do you think would be numbers for these engines?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Andrewk4 In reply to mrbill6ishere [2017-07-05 19:30:50 +0000 UTC]
Not sure, I would look up on a PRR roster website and see if there are any sizable gaps in the numbers or even take from the first generation diesels.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Engine97 [2017-03-03 02:58:44 +0000 UTC]
I REALLY like that 2-8-4! I might even build a model of her!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Engine97 In reply to Engine97 [2017-03-03 02:59:57 +0000 UTC]
Would you mind if I drew a rendition of the gal? I'll be sure to credit you!
I once drew up a concept for a Western Maryland 2-8-4
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Andrewk4 In reply to Engine97 [2017-03-03 03:12:10 +0000 UTC]
Sure! I'll have to look up that WM 2-8-4 some time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Engine97 In reply to Andrewk4 [2017-03-03 03:16:32 +0000 UTC]
engine97.deviantart.com/art/Fu…
She's mostly C&O based... it was created back in a time when my drawing skills were sub-par, my knowledge of steam inadequate and my imagination limited. I should take a crack at the old girl again sometime!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mrbill6ishere [2017-02-20 15:09:47 +0000 UTC]
Also, the T1s are kind of long. So I'd make them into 4-8-6s.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rail-Brony-GXY [2017-01-30 16:40:03 +0000 UTC]
Um…I take it the R2 is a Northern version of the S2? If so, it fits into my universe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
mrbill6ishere In reply to Rail-Brony-GXY [2017-02-10 21:35:12 +0000 UTC]
My own idea was that the R2 is just a M1 with a larger firebox and ergo a bigger trailing truck. The R3 is the one based on the S2 in my AU.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Andrewk4 In reply to Rail-Brony-GXY [2017-02-01 02:42:34 +0000 UTC]
One very well could be, but I haven't dug that deep into this alternate power.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dinodanthetrainman [2017-01-30 15:31:11 +0000 UTC]
Awesome! Did I inspire the decisions you made on the R2?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Andrewk4 In reply to dinodanthetrainman [2017-02-01 02:44:34 +0000 UTC]
Actually did not see them but they are very good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Andrewk4 In reply to mrbill6ishere [2017-01-30 02:12:55 +0000 UTC]
Basically the only difference is the 4 wheel trailing truck, as an experimental 4-8-4. If the Pennsy continued the class further the differences would continue. The different truck could also allow the locomotives to travel over lighter track due to greater weight displacement.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
mrbill6ishere In reply to Andrewk4 [2017-03-13 22:58:46 +0000 UTC]
I was wondering if you could try to model the Karen Parker engines now. If so thanks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mrbill6ishere In reply to Andrewk4 [2017-01-30 02:43:43 +0000 UTC]
made one based on the S2 Turbine. I'd classify yours the R2, then his the R3.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0