HOME | DD

Published: 2010-04-26 17:46:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 1145; Favourites: 42; Downloads: 42
Redirect to original
Description
Acrylics and Pastels on Paper*sold*
Related content
Comments: 26
FedersStrich [2011-10-07 18:34:28 +0000 UTC]
Diese Farben...*schwΓ€rm*.WunderwunderschΓΆn
π: 0 β©: 1
kiukkukissa [2011-02-22 19:33:07 +0000 UTC]
I love spirals. And the way you've used them in this painting is amazing.
π: 0 β©: 1
joseyjou [2010-11-25 22:24:02 +0000 UTC]
i adore this, would gladly hang it on my wall!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Vasilisa-Uzhasnaja [2010-05-15 19:43:50 +0000 UTC]
What, no comments? Pffff
The way you painted this is fantastic. The movement here is very present. That's usually surprisingly hard to find in a painting depicting wind. It tends to look stationary and solid, whereas here, although you used bold coloring and thick swirls, it flows naturally and beautifully. The texture is a bit interesting.
You managed also to make the woman look like she belongs as a wind sprite, rather than a figure the swirls were curling around, by keeping the colors of her skin and hair the same as the background and swirls around her, making the wind a part of her body (or rather her body a part of the wind)
Although only a few simple lines were used for her face, her profile shows very regal features that are almost birdlike, which is perfectly fitting, as she is engulfed by wind
All in all, a beautiful and underappreciated painting
π: 0 β©: 1
anitadunkl In reply to Vasilisa-Uzhasnaja [2010-05-16 08:06:27 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much for your wonderful comment !
I'm glad that you shared your thoughts with me... at first, I wasn't satisfied with that painting, because the woman looks so stationary. The face was also rather hard to do because I didn't want to "break" with the technique (no brushstrokes, just dotting the color but with the same thick brush).
Thanks for faving
π: 0 β©: 1
Vasilisa-Uzhasnaja In reply to anitadunkl [2010-05-16 11:20:27 +0000 UTC]
She doesn't seem stationary to me but an artist is always their biggest critic, so I understand.
π: 0 β©: 0