HOME | DD

Antares2 — * R a c h e l *

Published: 2014-09-14 21:15:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 7358; Favourites: 146; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Apo 7x 15B - no postwork.
Here are the params.  I rendered this in 1h30min at density 1000 and size 1024 x 1000 , because when I wanted to render at density 4000 and size 1600 x ? , it would take 13 hours to render. Did not want that !
What did I do wrong. I did not use the zoom, so I haven't got a clue what would be causing this long rendering time ! I have used density 4000 and size 1600 before and the rendering time was never so long then. Who can explain this to me ?


  
  
  
  
  
  
      77525A88428A9C4192B1409A9E209D8C00A09508899F1173
      801E5B752B669B2482841C6D6E155957136B41117E391991
      3121A5344B6A485F575D73455E6E355F6A25506F22417520
      3E6D1C46381E742016781B2B7C17416B26475B354E503745
      463A3C19360A1F2905251C003B1500510F005E07016B0002
      6A0805791E1B585D1B3B6F131E810C28811433811C489126
      617F5B813B837030885F268D6F33997F41A6793EA8743CAB
      6A59B96371AE173E83382F66592049701E32881C1CA02E14
      9D1A00A439058B360E7333185C2E10462909411812401318
      4A101E3A2628360E31312C302D4B2F21523A165A450E5863
      3A6F454C97545F954972943E75A23F78B140629F40428C5B
      2E828C0F70A50042A00531AB0B20B7080D8B18288A560592
      600D653F423B2D3C501B37660E207202097E0B0567480046
      820A2D981D18A12324A31937A5104AB1063ABB001DCD0C1D
      C61C1F8515146B1A0A5120004528003A3000273B08305B26
      45722D708D309E8F34A1802EA47229946B29896D2471691E
      61621C8C8A3D9B8535AB812DBE8335AD5A549E3385A2236A
      9F3833AF6027D43F1FDC3311E52703EF110CF2062ACE0030
      A1001F851C3A832A3C81383F6437347C593D849453799A55
      78B74E82AF3A9BA832D1961ED4CE52FFA16FD69A78A19B47
      808A724F83BD3D85C42C88CB2684AA3C7A8957795E42713A
      3B44152F26153C3A1457413661633B806F3BAF8241BF812E
      B8612CA150198D4423795A196B482050421B4E3C18650A19
      67000C7A001E87023997143EA2194DB60C6C9D057C870357
      831A42562B3E4C462C46522E495A302F51380C5A322C722C
      387B2C44934464B8485BAE564E9460459055507F51596D64
      642C91802AAF893AAD81518F88647EA39DB7A65A9B85479A
      6A3AAA4C40A60E4F930142782540854C42815E3F4E6D3153
      A4196AAD1C77BA1F7D9F2D85892A6E6F4762777060768367
      757D4CB80C22A05E247E58125D52006B450E79381C84271A
      8F17189E012089013575014A6A103C5F1F2F61293E64344E
      63444F63545124116021145F1E185E35314D4D4B3C624E4B
  
Related content

Antares2 - **T y p h e n e **

Antares2 - Seek the butterflies (jugendstil style)

Antares2 - Manipractal

Antares2 - Flower

Antares2 - Full Electric Brown

Antares2 - * Helen * [DD]

Antares2 - Hypertile 3D

Antares2 - Creating depth

Antares2 - Charlize

2BORN02B - Break A Leg

kiklopp - Ocean Garden [🤖]

NitidAI - Aetherveil [🤖]

LKGamingART - DA Supporter

LKGamingART - DA Super Supporter

Teira-Nova - High Res WiP Art Support

KirsanovStar - ALL ALBUM CONTENT

Hypnoshot - IndianCosmos

BGai - Challenge Flower

BlueDisciple - Floral Nesting Doll

technochroma - Radiant

Lady-Compassion - Chibi Love

teundenouden - fractiflower

jim88bro - Christmas Wrapping

Colliemom - He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not

ivankorsario - Las gardenias de Machin
Comments: 44

aremco7 [2022-05-01 04:30:15 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to aremco7 [2022-05-01 12:13:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

aremco7 In reply to Antares2 [2022-05-01 14:28:59 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Doll-Ladi [2021-07-29 00:01:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to Doll-Ladi [2021-07-31 10:41:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Doll-Ladi In reply to Antares2 [2021-07-31 11:17:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kootenayphotos [2016-08-01 04:59:23 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to kootenayphotos [2016-08-01 15:36:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks !!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheBlindAlchemist [2016-05-10 03:42:42 +0000 UTC]

This is simply beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to TheBlindAlchemist [2016-05-11 21:39:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Lunna !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Annabeth5110 [2016-03-09 19:28:18 +0000 UTC]

Nice, but was there the need to all this coding in the description?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to Annabeth5110 [2016-03-09 21:57:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks !

"Rachel" was made using Apophysis.  Deviants working with this or any other fractal generator  (f.e. Mandelbulb) often post the "params", the code of the "fractal", for other Deviants to be able to "tweak" (read change)  them into another creation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

moonhigh [2015-08-17 20:39:17 +0000 UTC]

100, beautiful work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to moonhigh [2015-08-20 07:30:57 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jakeukalane [2015-08-17 20:02:11 +0000 UTC]

Amazing work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to Jakeukalane [2015-08-20 07:30:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jakeukalane In reply to Antares2 [2015-08-20 10:31:55 +0000 UTC]

welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fractal2cry [2015-08-16 11:56:12 +0000 UTC]

there u go another

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to fractal2cry [2015-08-16 12:35:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

eReSaW [2015-08-16 11:14:07 +0000 UTC]

No. 97

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to eReSaW [2015-08-16 11:15:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank you !!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

YuryKyssa [2015-04-25 10:01:36 +0000 UTC]

Very Good!!!   

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to YuryKyssa [2015-04-26 14:33:08 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LukasFractalizator [2015-01-20 08:50:12 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PaMonk [2014-12-30 04:12:55 +0000 UTC]

Most Beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to PaMonk [2015-01-01 13:39:14 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much !!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PaMonk In reply to Antares2 [2015-01-01 22:58:30 +0000 UTC]

You are Very Welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darniko [2014-11-04 13:36:02 +0000 UTC]

very beautiful work with much sensibility I like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lupsiberg [2014-10-29 13:44:22 +0000 UTC]

Your flower is lovely!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lupsiberg [2014-10-29 13:43:54 +0000 UTC]

Hi Karina (my namesake )

I have looked at your flame and found the following:

1. Render times depend a lot on the capacity of your computer. On my pc the flame of the size 1024 x 1000, density 1000 takes a little over 22 minutes. Size 1600 x 1563, density 4000 takes approx. 2 and a half hours.

2. You use "crackle" twice. Crackle is a very slow variation and requires a lot of patience.

3. There is one thing you don't mention: Which value did you use for oversample? If you use higher than 1, a flame takes much longer to render. I have been working with Apophysis since 2008, and I have never used oversample higher than 1.

I hope this helps

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to Lupsiberg [2014-10-29 22:27:41 +0000 UTC]

This comment is  intended for Lupsiberg !
I believe the params posted here really do mention the "oversample "1"  if i'm not mistaken, unless you mean something else ?
Thank you for the fav and for your reply on my question regarding the longer rendering time.
I appreciate it very much ! I'll keep in mind that crackle is a slow variation !!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lupsiberg In reply to Antares2 [2014-10-30 10:10:06 +0000 UTC]

You are welcome That's what I meant with "oversample", I just thought you might have tried with a higher value earlier

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tsahel [2014-09-23 16:06:10 +0000 UTC]

simple but so beautiful !

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Antares2 In reply to tsahel [2014-10-29 22:26:42 +0000 UTC]

I believe the params posted here really do mention the "oversample "1"  if i'm not mistaken, unless you mean something else ?
Thank you for the fav and for your reply on my question regarding the longer rendering time.
I appreciate it very much ! I'll keep in mind that crackle is a slow variation !!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Antares2 In reply to tsahel [2014-09-24 10:06:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

allthenightlong [2014-09-20 16:11:48 +0000 UTC]

wonderful flower!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to allthenightlong [2014-09-21 08:43:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much. Have another one coming up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gitte [2014-09-18 08:53:09 +0000 UTC]

Lovely

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to gitte [2014-09-18 10:16:09 +0000 UTC]

thnx ! also for the devwatch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sabine62 [2014-09-14 21:17:01 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely stunning

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to Sabine62 [2014-09-14 21:26:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.  Wanted to try a flower that was more closed, but did not succeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sabine62 In reply to Antares2 [2014-09-14 21:27:53 +0000 UTC]

I think it is wonderful just like it is

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Antares2 In reply to Sabine62 [2014-09-14 21:30:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sabine62 In reply to Antares2 [2014-09-14 21:33:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0