HOME | DD
Published: 2012-12-05 22:18:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 4498; Favourites: 116; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Here, have some Rule 63 AppleJack. After all, that moment in "magic duel" was priceless. (Even if it was just big mac)Enjoy~
Tumblr: [link]
Related content
Comments: 41
strongbad-joe132 [2016-06-21 02:39:17 +0000 UTC]
Does anyone else have a strong urge to rub her belly?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TimberWolf651 [2013-11-11 17:01:06 +0000 UTC]
Oh dear. Not fun having your anatomy revised, is it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ApertureIndigo In reply to TimberWolf651 [2013-11-20 19:47:39 +0000 UTC]
Well, I am always working on my anatomy. My sketch book is full of anatomy practice. -v-
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TimberWolf651 In reply to ApertureIndigo [2013-11-21 06:42:11 +0000 UTC]
Heh, poor choice of term. Well plaid, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
attack193 [2012-12-09 15:08:22 +0000 UTC]
That pose is just so easy for my mind to turn horrible. Why would you do this?! XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ApertureIndigo In reply to attack193 [2012-12-09 20:34:02 +0000 UTC]
Because those are the best kinds of poses! c:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
attack193 In reply to ApertureIndigo [2012-12-10 01:00:28 +0000 UTC]
You are a sadistic person XD
Though I DO like the art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DaBunnanaKing In reply to ApertureIndigo [2012-12-07 23:09:55 +0000 UTC]
Sounds like a creepy name you would give for shipping Applejack and Big Mac... oh lordy, why did I think of that... and am I a bad person for doing so.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ApertureIndigo In reply to DaBunnanaKing [2012-12-08 04:34:01 +0000 UTC]
LOL Some people do ship that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RainyMeadows [2012-12-07 02:43:45 +0000 UTC]
I remember finding out it was actually Big Mac covered in paint and I just thought "So close..."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RainyMeadows In reply to ApertureIndigo [2012-12-07 07:41:07 +0000 UTC]
Maybe there could be an episode where that spell actually exists. If so, they should use Trotsworth's designs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
stickman00 In reply to RainyMeadows [2013-01-28 00:04:31 +0000 UTC]
Magic Duel kinda showed that a R63 spell exists or else Trixie might of called BS
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ApertureIndigo In reply to RainyMeadows [2012-12-07 18:28:34 +0000 UTC]
Yes~
Or maybe the could pull a "fan fiction thing".
Just like Adventure time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RainyMeadows In reply to ApertureIndigo [2012-12-08 00:02:28 +0000 UTC]
I don't watch Adventure Time, but I know what the concept for that episode was and it sounds utterly hilarious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
megasdragon [2012-12-06 23:54:30 +0000 UTC]
your art style is alot like braeburned's its an awsome style
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ApertureIndigo In reply to megasdragon [2012-12-07 01:54:09 +0000 UTC]
He was one of the people that I did learn from. I have a list. Haha
And thanks~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kingtiger666 [2012-12-06 22:18:10 +0000 UTC]
Dangit, mah prick ain't even big enough for me ta jack off! Twalaht! Make it bigger!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MrSpanyard [2012-12-06 21:18:46 +0000 UTC]
Good draw
Is (s)he so shy (s)he has to cover his/her masculinity?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
darkenedfox137 [2012-12-05 23:11:43 +0000 UTC]
Cool, that pose must have been hard to draw... What's rule 63?
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
ApertureIndigo In reply to darkenedfox137 [2012-12-06 03:36:12 +0000 UTC]
The pose wasn't too difficult to draw. But it did give me some trouble.
Rule 63 is the rule of the internet that involves gender bending.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
darkenedfox137 In reply to ApertureIndigo [2012-12-06 04:27:46 +0000 UTC]
Oh... Ok. Thanks y'all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lazynerd In reply to darkenedfox137 [2012-12-06 00:50:24 +0000 UTC]
Rule 63: for every fictional character, there exists a counterpart of opposite gender.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
superduper-guy-man In reply to darkenedfox137 [2012-12-06 00:28:40 +0000 UTC]
Rule 63 states: "For every male character, there shall be a female version of that character, and vice versa."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RealLazyArtist [2012-12-05 23:09:17 +0000 UTC]
haha, ever since that last episode I've been seeing a lot of Rule 63 of Applejack lately. Good job. the pose is adorable X3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sleepysheep7 [2012-12-05 22:44:38 +0000 UTC]
I've always tried to think up a good name for R63 Apple Jack the closest I've come to his Apple Johnny or Johnny Apple.
He looks pretty good but still a bit effeminate (I think it is the long mane and maybe the pose)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ApertureIndigo In reply to sleepysheep7 [2012-12-05 22:54:23 +0000 UTC]
Thanks
I think it's the long mane too. Plus when I originally drew the sketch skeleton for this pic, it wasn't meant to be applejack.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0

























