HOME | DD

#assassin #bladed #byzantine #church #constantine #constantinople #creed #cross #hagia #justinian #ottoman #quote #rome #sophia #assassinscreed
Published: 2016-05-07 13:56:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 4599; Favourites: 30; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
As the Roman Empire's borders continued to grow and grow, it became harder and harder for just one emperor to govern. And so by 330 AD, the Empire was divided into two halves: East and West. These two halves would come to be ruled by their own emperors, though both halves considered themselves to be a part of the Roman Empire. The earliest emperor of the Eastern Roman Empire, what would eventually be called the Byzantine Empire, was Constantine I. Constantine had captured the city of Byzantium during his reign, renaming the city Constantinople, and by 324, he had officially moved the capital of the Roman Empire to Constantinople.
Constantine was neither fully allied with the Templars or the Assassins, rather he had both orders constantly whispering in his ears. He did offer the Byzantine people a good amount of religious freedom, a move supported by the Assassins. However, he did make a strong effort to enforce his own religion onto the people, a Templar-backed plan. Several other leaders would follow this pattern throughout Byzantine history. Though, after the Western Roman Empire collapsed in 476, the Templars gained a much bigger influence after they were forced to shift their focus on what was left of Rome.
One of the more famous Byzantine emperors was Justinian I, who ruled from 527 until his death in 565. It has been suggested that Justinian had a Sage within his church, whispering strategies in his ear, though some claim that Justinian himself was the Sage due to his different eye colors and occasional insanity. Whatever the case, Justinian proved extremely successful in his operations. He put a lot of effort into taking back territory from the Goths that tore down Western Rome. His general, Belisarius, even managed to take back the city of Rome itself, though not for long. Upon hearing that Belisarius had lost Rome again, Justinian had him blinded.
Justinian did do his fair share of building up things as well as tearing them down though. His most famous building project was the massive church (which eventually became a mosque) called the Hagia Sophia. What kept him reigned in was mostly his wife, Theodora, who worked as an influential ally to the Assassins. However, when she died of the plague in 548, Justinian was basically engulfed in Templar influence. The Assassins eventually put him to death in 565 because of the way he restricted and restrained the freedoms of the Byzantine people.
Several other Byzantine emperors would go through similar patterns of switching loyalties. But the Byzantine Empire definitely ended on a Templar note. The last Byzantine emperor, Constantine XI Palaiologos, worked with the Templars to systematically capture and execute most of the Assassins in the empire. The Assassins bounced back however, when in 1453, the Ottoman sultan, Mehmet II, and his armies conquered Constantinople, killed Palaiologos, and destroyed the Byzantine Empire once and for all. The Ottomans, upon officially claiming the land as theirs, changed the name of the city of Constantinople to Istanbul, which it's still called to this day.
Why did Constantinople get the works? Well, that's nobody's business but the Turks.
Related content
Comments: 28
Rhomaion [2018-09-21 07:42:23 +0000 UTC]
Great byzantine artwork, of-course apart from the minarets, the sword that a byzantine assassin would use would be a spathion, which is a straight edge roman sword
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Avapithecus In reply to Rhomaion [2018-09-21 13:39:46 +0000 UTC]
The minaret error I definitely take responsibility for because I was really tired that day and wasn't thinking too much about it XD The Assassin design is Ubisoft's fault though. That character is just the one they displayed in AC Unity, swords and all
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rhomaion In reply to Avapithecus [2018-11-28 04:47:53 +0000 UTC]
I could definitely see a byzantine assassin being the member of the exkoubitoi who lasted to the late 1000s AD, or alternatively could be a byzantine imperial guard and a part of the assassins
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Historyman14 [2017-05-14 04:43:52 +0000 UTC]
Poor Byzantines. If only they had stay within Assassin Hands, things could have been better for them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Avapithecus In reply to Halkras12 [2017-05-02 22:21:37 +0000 UTC]
I know I wasn't thinking about it at the time lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Halkras12 In reply to Avapithecus [2017-05-02 22:31:01 +0000 UTC]
im from turkey,maybe suleiman was the greatest sultan ever in ottoma empire but him choice was very bad,but if he didnt killed his son
mayber bigger ottoman waits us but........this is fate,you cant change
we are still happy because we have republic
democracy is better than monarchy
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Avapithecus In reply to Halkras12 [2017-05-02 22:38:29 +0000 UTC]
Whatever makes you happy, my friend
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vaultboy1011 [2017-01-16 04:23:24 +0000 UTC]
Ahhh the Byzantine Empire and Justinian. If there was ever a assassin's creed game I want to be set its here. Especially under the reign of Justinian I. He was such a well liked emperor and the only thing he ever truly wanted was to restore the old Roman Empire. And the other thing he truly loved was his wife and when she died it just broke the man and it's such a shame. I highly recommend the youtube Channel called "Extra Credits" they have a series which goes in depth on Justinian's reign.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Avapithecus In reply to Vaultboy1011 [2017-01-16 15:54:44 +0000 UTC]
The Byzantines certainly had an interesting history, didn't they? Then again, my main resources tend to be my Latin teacher, wikipedia, and Crash Course so chances are there's a lot of stuff I missed for this time period XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vaultboy1011 In reply to Avapithecus [2017-01-16 16:06:02 +0000 UTC]
They did, they really did and I truly wish Ubisoft could explore this time period more. But then again I want to see them go into many other time periods XD. But like this particular time. Maybe we can assist Justinian in regaining Rome, interact with Theodora and Belisarius. And of course see Hagia Sophia again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Avapithecus In reply to Vaultboy1011 [2017-01-16 16:24:09 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps. Personally I prefer the Ottoman side of Constantinople's history but hey that's just me ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vaultboy1011 In reply to Avapithecus [2017-01-16 16:29:55 +0000 UTC]
True the Ottoman Empire always had a certain flair to them ^^. But Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople and many people wonder how Constantinople got the works but that's nobody's business but the Turks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AMELIANVS [2016-05-22 10:11:45 +0000 UTC]
These is not meant to make you anyhow discouraged from drawing but as a kind of history fanatic I need to point some detail out:
There are some historical issues with Hagia Sophia as represented here-the most obvious one are the Ottoman Muslim minarets which were definitely not present in 555(at that time Islam didn't even exist yet).First minaret was only added to this cathedral during 2nd half of the 15th century,so almost 1000 years after 555.
Second issue is with used cathedral dome-when Roman Emperor Justinian ordered to construct his first H.S version this dome looked differently( s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/7… ).Cathedral only gets its current shape after original one collapsed after suffering two earthquakes in 557.New more stabile dome was consequently constructed-that one we can see now and which was finished only shortly before Justinian died(he died in 565)in 562.
Third issue is with the space around the cathedral-it was not full of trees and green in 555(as well as many centuries afterwards) but an Augustaion square,one of the most famous ceremonial grounds in Constantinople stood there( s3.amazonaws.com/juicyecumenis… -more victory collumns were actually present than in this reconstruction).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Avapithecus In reply to AMELIANVS [2016-05-22 13:14:11 +0000 UTC]
Well, I do appreciate the historical advice. I admit, I didn't look much into the original structure of the building. I just kinda went to the location in Assassin's Creed Revelations and drew what I saw. I probably could have done more research, but my main goal was just to draw this beautiful building, which I really hope I was able to do, despite the historical inaccuracies. Thanks for informing me on this building's structural history bit. I'll be sure to keep it in mind if I ever draw it again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SweetElectricity [2016-05-14 01:04:44 +0000 UTC]
Ooohuuu wow ~ The picture is so dramatic!!!1!1 Love it !
And the story the goes along it, is pretty noice too! : 0
I love the addition of peoples deaths being tied together too!
ALtho that's not really a good thing lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Avapithecus In reply to SweetElectricity [2016-05-14 01:39:38 +0000 UTC]
lol Thanks so much Sweets!!! ^^
I had a lot of fun drawing the Hagia Sophia here. It's a really beautiful building irl
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nerdman3000 [2016-05-13 17:49:46 +0000 UTC]
You know, I'm surprised you didn't do one of these about Amunet, the Assassin who killed Cleopatra.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Avapithecus In reply to Nerdman3000 [2016-05-13 18:51:01 +0000 UTC]
Well, I did mention Amunet back in the Roman Republic one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nerdman3000 In reply to Avapithecus [2016-05-13 21:45:31 +0000 UTC]
I know, but it would have been nice to have an entire image and summary dedicated to her, like you had one of Iltani. You could even focus it on Mark Antony vs Octavian and the rise of the Roman Empire.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Avapithecus In reply to Nerdman3000 [2016-05-13 21:52:07 +0000 UTC]
I suppose, though I didn't really know how to draw out a summary for that time period. I never really found much interesting information of Egypt during Cleopatra's reign, at least not enough to fill one of these pictures. I just kinda threw it in with the Roman stuff because her reign was so closely tied with Rome. I dunno. I might go back and revisit that time period some day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nerdman3000 In reply to Avapithecus [2016-05-13 23:40:40 +0000 UTC]
Well, like I said, you could focus it on Mark Antony vs Octavian. Cleopatra was the lover of Mark Antony and historically, she poisoned herself when Octavian beat her and Mark Antony at the Battle of Actium and Antony committed suicide. After her and Mark Antony's death, Ocatvian returned to Rome and declared himself the First Emperor of Rome, renaming himself as Augustus Caesar. Like I said, you could focus on the rise of the Roman Empire itself, but have the image be of Iltani poisoning Cleopatra, which was an important event in that situation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
AMELIANVS In reply to Nerdman3000 [2016-05-22 09:48:47 +0000 UTC]
Octavian never declared hismself the first Emperor of Rome.Apart from Romans at that time actually lacked a speciffic word for a rank we now call in English as "The Emperor" Augustus was also acting in complete opposite to doing anything like declaring hismself the first Emperor of Rome even if they would have already a term for it which they did not.There never was any dramatic proclamation of an Empire in the sense of a state ruled by Emperors.Augustus was heavily trying to keep an impression nothing really changed and Roman state was still oficially a Roman republic.In fact term "Roman Republic" copntinued to be used as one of the official names of the Roman Empire even after fall of the west in eastern half of the Empire during medieval times.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Avapithecus In reply to Nerdman3000 [2016-05-14 00:00:12 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps, but I feel like Cleopatra's time period should be mostly separate from Rome’s story. Like, the focus should be on Egypt where she had the biggest impact. The biggest reason I gave Alexander the Great his own pic was because the empire he built had such a massive impact on the world. Whereas Cleopatra's reign seems to only be a big deal because of her ties to Rome. I dunno. Maybe I'm just not looking deep enough...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0