HOME | DD

bagera3005 — avro arrow 2 cf-220 by

Published: 2011-02-27 06:28:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 22174; Favourites: 184; Downloads: 623
Redirect to original
Description avro arrow 2 cf-220

General characteristics

* Crew: 1
* Length: 83 ft 9
* Wingspan: 54 ft 0
* Height: 15 ft 6
* Wing area: 1,225 ft²
* Airfoil: NACA 0003.5 mod root, NACA 0003.8 tip
* Empty weight: 50,040 lb
* Loaded weight: 67,920 lb
* Max takeoff weight: 100,605 lb
* 2× G Pratt & Whitney YF220 , 65,000 lbf

Performance

* Maximum speed: Mach 6.6
* Cruise speed: Mach 3.4+ est.hypercruise at altitude
* Combat radius: 900-520 mi[15] (1448.4096 nmi, 1.448.4096 km)
* Service ceiling: 95,000 ft (28.95600m)
* Wing loading: 70 lb/ft² (456 kg/m

# Secondary Powerplant: 1× General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136 afterburning turbofan, >40,000 lbf (178 kN) [in development]
# Lift fan (STOVL): 1× Rolls-Royce LiftSystem driven from either F135 or F136 power plant, 18,000 lbf (80 kN)
# Internal fuel: 35.00 IB

Armament

* Guns: 2 × GAU-22/A 25 mm (0.984 in) cannon in internal mounted
* Hardpoints: 4× external pylons on wings with a capacity of 30,000 lb ( internal mounted on Rotary Launcher Assembly (RLA)[37],
* Missiles: 12 loud
o Internal: 12 air-to-air missiles, or 16 air-to-air missiles and 20 air-to-ground weapons.
o External: 6 air-to-air missiles, or 4 air-to-ground weapons and 2 air-to-air missiles[40] with combinations for the following missiles:
o Air-to-air missiles:
+ AIM-120 AMRAAM
+ AIM-132 ASRAAM
+ AIM-9X Sidewinder
o Air-to-ground weapons:
4× AGM-88 HARM
+ AGM-154 JSOW
+ AGM-158 JASSM


Anti-ship missiles:
2× AGM-84 Harpoon or
4× AGM-119 Penguin


Related content
Comments: 44

Alopecia18 [2025-03-30 18:34:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jaxer6969 [2020-12-08 01:20:54 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to jaxer6969 [2020-12-08 03:54:23 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

jaxer6969 In reply to bagera3005 [2021-02-19 14:12:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to jaxer6969 [2021-02-19 16:45:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jaxer6969 In reply to bagera3005 [2020-12-08 13:14:48 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jaxer6969 [2020-12-08 00:59:16 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Brodie22 [2020-07-07 21:33:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chinook-the-Orca [2020-02-15 07:18:42 +0000 UTC]

I rather love this design; the original arrow is a personal favorite and this is an awesome hypothetical next step.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LuiMar1997 [2019-05-02 23:15:45 +0000 UTC]

Bagera, I’ve now been thinking—is there a way to incorporate 3D thrust vectoring onto the cf-220? Just to see how it may look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to LuiMar1997 [2019-05-03 00:10:12 +0000 UTC]

i been thinking of making sleeker one

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LuiMar1997 [2017-05-28 23:06:04 +0000 UTC]

Canada should revive this plane, it's simply a grand masterpiece of military aviation. 

To add, my grandfather worked on the original Arrow, so this plane would have sentimental value.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to LuiMar1997 [2017-05-28 23:57:04 +0000 UTC]

i dont think a rebirth of Arrow will  happen under  Justin Trudeau

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LuiMar1997 In reply to bagera3005 [2017-05-29 04:27:50 +0000 UTC]

Just wishful thinking.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Buckshot488 [2014-06-10 02:47:54 +0000 UTC]

This is simply amazing. Stunning work. I would be drooling all over the news channel if I saw that thing unveiled!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SpartanofMandalor [2013-07-21 05:09:20 +0000 UTC]

you don't mind, I was wondering if I could use your design for some of my fanfiction stories on FanfictionNet. I promise to give you full credit should you agree. If not, I understand completely.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to SpartanofMandalor [2013-07-21 09:09:46 +0000 UTC]

just as long as i get cradit

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SpartanofMandalor In reply to bagera3005 [2013-08-01 04:27:53 +0000 UTC]

Believe me, I'm a lot of things. And someone who steals the credit for other people's work is most certainly NOT AMONG THEM.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to SpartanofMandalor [2013-08-01 04:59:15 +0000 UTC]

cool its all i ask for

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SpartanofMandalor [2013-07-19 23:14:20 +0000 UTC]

This! Is! Awesome! I absolutely love this artwork.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

templar127 [2012-02-08 13:37:06 +0000 UTC]

If this has Ace Combat reference, It is EPIC!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

skyworthy [2011-08-13 21:03:51 +0000 UTC]

Have you seen my aircraft It is very interesting designed as a fighter but is based off of the Aurora Though the picture I got it from was a kids drawing book I have held onto for grins The image itself was far less interesting than the skytalon. It is in my Gallery Id like some feedback. i created the picture three years ago and it was my first post to DA and I've gotten no feedback

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

skyworthy [2011-08-08 04:28:24 +0000 UTC]

Is this based off a real aircraft or is it one that you came up with on your own? Either way its a sweet set of wings. I was hoping that I might use this as a basis for a similar design (it would not be exactly the same my works have to have my own personal spin, but, it would be very close) If you refuse permission then I will understand. thank you.


Rise up! Soar on!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to skyworthy [2011-08-08 05:27:22 +0000 UTC]

just credit me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DavidAkerson [2011-03-15 15:52:40 +0000 UTC]

At least MacNamara won't cancel this one

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to DavidAkerson [2011-03-15 16:00:26 +0000 UTC]

there are some in aviation industry wish some one would have canceled MacNamara

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAkerson In reply to bagera3005 [2011-03-16 09:54:03 +0000 UTC]

His legacy lives on with the stupid Joint Strike Fighter project. When will the Pentagon learn that a "one size fits all" fighter is an utterly flawed concept.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

skyworthy In reply to DavidAkerson [2011-08-08 04:41:40 +0000 UTC]

the fact that they tried to create a "One size fits all fighter" as a means to save money on paper was a plausible idea. After the production of the aircraft proved too costly to complete the project was scrapped. The destination for them finding a solution is out there. They just haven't found there way there yet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JTGuilber [2011-03-08 06:04:19 +0000 UTC]

Wow! I would say, SR-73 Maple! That's how you scare the crap out of the enemy.
Really nice, from the lines to the actual name.
Congrats!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Colonel-382 [2011-03-02 21:09:02 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely BEAUTIFUL!!!

Now if our government would only resurrect this aircraft in reality!

Gotta love how Prime Minister Diefenbaker thought how the Bowmarc Missile would be oh so much better.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

DreadHaven [2011-03-02 00:58:51 +0000 UTC]

Damn you U.S for being greedy. We had the first supersonic fighter, and the U.S wanted it scrapped so we would continue buying their planes instead of making our own.
Greedy, greedy bastards
On another topic, great work!

👍: 2 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to DreadHaven [2011-03-02 01:10:58 +0000 UTC]

yell at robert macnamara ass is hated THROW OUT AVIATION INDUSTRY

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DreadHaven In reply to bagera3005 [2011-03-02 01:14:10 +0000 UTC]

Boo!
Such a waste. All that ward work for nothing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to DreadHaven [2011-03-02 03:30:36 +0000 UTC]

here link to old one
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rattoratrat [2011-03-01 04:36:40 +0000 UTC]

Awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SPARKZ1987 [2011-02-28 17:33:23 +0000 UTC]

I want to see india LCH attack heli now friend .plz

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to SPARKZ1987 [2011-03-01 04:34:37 +0000 UTC]

in time don't push

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chilli-Con-Dre [2011-02-27 22:07:12 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful design, looks awesome, nice job

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Roguewing [2011-02-27 20:13:22 +0000 UTC]

Interesting design

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jay-villneff [2011-02-27 13:25:12 +0000 UTC]

AWESOME!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

theF-man [2011-02-27 06:38:20 +0000 UTC]

Looks Cool! Canadian SR-71 like!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Second-Perfection [2011-02-27 06:36:17 +0000 UTC]

Cool. Your own design or an actual design?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bagera3005 In reply to Second-Perfection [2011-02-27 06:42:29 +0000 UTC]

hypothetical design on books not know if built based off a ruff

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

arenafighter [2011-02-27 06:35:03 +0000 UTC]

Awesome Job! 3 Words:TOP GUN Canada!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0