HOME | DD

Baron-Engel — Ingram MAC-10 submachine gun

Published: 2015-01-16 15:59:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 6174; Favourites: 80; Downloads: 103
Redirect to original
Description This is a B/W study I did for the color piece "Say hello to the iMAC-10" Say hello to iMac-10 . MAC-10 was the creation of Gordon B. Ingram and was manufactured by his Military Armament Corporation in the late 60's and early 70's. It was intended to be a compact submachine gun for Special Forces operating in Vietnam and for various security agencies that needed a small, concealable submachine gun. Military Armament Company went out of business around 1974 and since then other manufacturers have produced the MAC-10 it and it's brethren.

One of the big selling points of the MAC-10 was that it was designed from the start to be used with suppressors. In particular it was designed to be used with the Sionics suppressor that Mitchell Werbell III had designed. Since 45ACP round has a very low muzzle velocity it was easy to suppress and this made for a very quiet weapon. While by todays standards the Sionics suppressor is rather large and heavy it was for its time one of the better designs around. It also was one of the first non-wipe style suppressors to go into production.

The MAC-10 has been described by some as being "America's answer to the Israeli Uzi"; this is not an entirely accurate comparison since they were designed for somewhat different roles. The Uzi was primarily created for general use submachine gun by mechanized infantry units, vehicle crews, and paratrooper units. The MAC-10 was really only meant for specialized use by units like SEALs, Green Berets, etc. The standard Uzi is much larger weapon, 440mm for an Uzi with stock folded compared to 280mm for a MAC-10. Rates of fire are very different between the two weapons. The Uzi with its rate of fire around 600rpm which seems almost glacial compared to the MAC-10 which rips along between 1,000 and 1,100rpm! A more accurate comparison would be between the MAC-10 and the Mini Uzi which has closer dimensions and rate of fire.
Related content
Comments: 18

werejaguar [2015-08-26 08:07:45 +0000 UTC]

and so many people lost there thumbs due shitty handling from this thing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePhoenixPL [2015-01-17 10:15:41 +0000 UTC]

Looks like a beast, nice job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

James-Dark-Blue-Wolf [2015-01-17 08:32:45 +0000 UTC]

awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DingoPatagonico [2015-01-17 03:59:18 +0000 UTC]

so classic!!! was in almost all the 80`s movies XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mh47e [2015-01-16 19:13:24 +0000 UTC]

Also a neat benefit with the weight of the suppressor, is it helped against the recoil.

Nice work with this piece, ingram is one of those little pieces that are in my favs as a submachine gun.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Baron-Engel In reply to mh47e [2015-01-17 02:28:30 +0000 UTC]

MAC-10s a very rudimentary weapons compared to say a HK MP5 or KRISS etc. But they still have a certain rugged charm to them. I thought it was funny that when I was doing research for this piece one of the ways you could identify real MAC-10s from airsoft models was by looking at the fit and finish. The airsofts were usually much better done. All the MAC-10s and their smaller brethren have had the opportunity to pick and handle had this failed Metal Shop 101 project look and feel to them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mh47e In reply to Baron-Engel [2015-01-17 17:09:51 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I think the reason is because the Mac-10 was literally stamped out of metal sheets, unlike many weapons that have some detailed work put into them, these things were literally ready to be stamped and kicked out of the factory in droves. Certainly gave hollywood movie gun of the 80s to when one thinks about it, every gangster and hitman seemed to tote these things about.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Baron-Engel In reply to mh47e [2015-01-17 17:26:46 +0000 UTC]

Of course another reason why they appeared in so many movies and TV series in the 80's is also due to the fact that studios and rental agencies who provided props for the the studios had them in stock to rent. If no one had an item to rent did not appear in your film.

I remember watching an episode of Hawaii 5 O' in the late 70's and being amazed when a wannabe terrorist pulls out an AK-47 and starts shooting at the cops. At that time AKs were almost unheard of in the states and the ammo, blanks or otherwise was just about as rare, but some how the studio had found one for the episode. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mh47e In reply to Baron-Engel [2015-01-17 19:01:46 +0000 UTC]

Wow, now that is an intersting fact! Course now they are so abundant that movies like Lord of War literally got real AK's because they ended up being cheaper in bulk then the props.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dgs-Krieger [2015-01-16 17:35:05 +0000 UTC]

Ah, yes. I remember these little annoyances from Farcry 2.

Please tell me you used a ruler for the straight parts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Baron-Engel In reply to Dgs-Krieger [2015-01-17 02:08:30 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I use a ruler when it is needed. I have never understood people who refuse the right tool for the job.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dgs-Krieger In reply to Baron-Engel [2015-01-17 09:37:49 +0000 UTC]

2 cool 4 tool XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WeasleFire [2015-01-16 16:36:52 +0000 UTC]

Ooo, nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SierraRomeo [2015-01-16 16:23:10 +0000 UTC]

The 80ies have called - they want their signature weapons back
Well done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Baron-Engel In reply to SierraRomeo [2015-01-16 16:45:10 +0000 UTC]

Yeah every time I see one of these I can't help but hear the opening theme song for Miami Vice. www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTPu4h…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlackWeston [2015-01-16 16:01:34 +0000 UTC]

Nice detail about the gun

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Baron-Engel In reply to BlackWeston [2015-01-16 16:03:47 +0000 UTC]

Thanks and thank you for the watch.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlackWeston In reply to Baron-Engel [2015-01-16 16:04:44 +0000 UTC]

No pro. Your anthros with guns got me in it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0