HOME | DD

BlakeCurranInnocence
Published: 2012-08-20 10:42:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 3824; Favourites: 102; Downloads: 17
Redirect to original
Description It was a time of love, a time of hate, the era of justice and immorality, the season of both insanity and clarity of mind. Sound familiar, don't it? Me wife used to love Dickens. Read him to me all the time, she did. That Jane what's-her-face woman, too: it is a truth universally acknowledged that a criminal who committed a crime is in want of a good hanging. Ring a bell?

Yes, I like me literary allusions. I do, you know. Remind me of sweet Elaine. She was a messy death, but worth it. Oh boy, was she worth it. Crying and begging right up to the end. She had it coming to her, bet your arse she did, mate.

Why am I here anyway? I've already confessed. I'm a doomed son of a gun. Don't I get any last whatchamacallits? Can't I have a coldie, before I go up there and have me neck snapped back? Any beer will do – I drink 'em all, so long as it's not that light crap.

Answer me, goddammit! What the bloody hell am I doing here? Kill me already. Inject me with the needle or string me up like a ham hock.

It's this waiting that's the worst. The waiting for justice to be served. Maybe it's like revenge: best served cold. Justice like revenge, ha! What a joke…

Jokes. She used to love jokes. She had some real crackers, too. Made me laugh, a real belly laugh. They were dirty, most of 'em, but they're the best type: sex, sex, sex. Don't let me get started on the sex.

I knew something was wrong soon as I shot the dog. Ruddy dog, such a nuisance. Something inside of me just…clicked. I knew what I had to do, to put us both out of our misery. Killing her was the only option I could see, for crying out loud. Strewth, I'm telling you the truth. I swore that oath, didn't I?

Boy, wouldn't want to get killed again now.

I'm guilty as sin. Hang me already. I'm not sorry that I did it, you know. Not goddamn near sorry enough, if you ask me. I wish I was, but you wanted honesty, so here it is.

I loved her. That's why I did it. But she had the same thing as the dog, and I couldn't stand it. Could not bloody stand it.

I tried to ignore her. So I'd stand out on the verandah, wearing nothing but stubbies and thongs, guzzling nothing but beer for hours on end. Just stand there, staring out across me property, all that bush. It's so…what's the word Elaine would use? Secluded. It's so secluded there. Made it hard to get to. I'd lived there all me life, on that sheep station, middle of nowhere.

I feel like a right dickhead up here, telling you idiots all this. Shouldn't you know already? An eye for an eye, a life for a life? I don't care. It's what I deserve. I would've ended me own life, if I wasn't such a bloody coward.

So, do I get a beer or not?

You think you know where this is going? Perhaps you do. Perhaps: what a stupid word. But yeah, you might know where this is going, but just in case you still don't get it:

I killed Elaine Thompson. Without remorse or regret.

Was I happy? I'm not a psycho. I was relieved. It had to be done. I was glad I did it, but I wasn't happy about it. Fair dinkum, happy? What a stupid question.

The night in question, to be so wordy and smart-arse like her, was balmy. There was a slight nor'-westerly coming through, and you could see the trees bowing this way and that. By about ten, the wind was picking up, and if I wasn't, uh, preoccupied, I would've been worried. As it was, the trees' branches were breaking and snapping all over the place, and it was the perfect disguise.

I didn't want to do it inside – and I'm sure she wouldn't have wanted it either – so I carried her outside. She was asleep seeing as I drugged her with dinner and all.

It doesn't matter what I used…they were prescription drugs. Hers. From years ago, when she had a knee replacement. Now you're getting me off track. You want to know how I did it? Listen, then, arsehole.

I carried her outside, lay her beneath her favourite tree.

I shot her. Three times in the head. Once in the heart. Head over heart, get it?

She would've gotten it. That's me sense of humour. Elaine would have understood.

Anyway, you finished? You heard enough? Please, take me away if you won't kill me. Punish me. I'm guilty, guilty, guilty. Hang me, shock me, perform a lobotomy. I don't care. I know now that I deserve to die.

I deserve to die a long and excruciatingly painful death. Elaine would've loved me using that word. Her bloody vocabulary…she should've been a uni professor or something. She might've written a book if she could.

But, at the end, all she could do was moan and speak between gasps and sleep.

It was so hard to get to, where we lived. Help never came. I didn't even bother to ring an ambulance when she came down with the plague. The dog had it too, you know. It was better just to put them out of their miseries. Misery. Or is it miseries?

Grammar matters! It reminds me of Elaine, me sweet, sweet Elaine.

How come I don't have it? That plague? They did tests on me. Jabbed me, took my piss, and apparently I'm immune to it. Some people are. Most aren't.

Can you kill me now? Please?

Yes, you can. What do you mean you can't? Are you goddamn crazy? But it wasn't…was it really? The last known case of the plague?

So what I did was right? We could've brought it back into the population? A service to the country?

Well…that changes things. I'm a free man, theoretically. Proven innocent but still so guilty.
Related content
Comments: 112

BlakeCurran In reply to ??? [2014-03-12 08:10:33 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much! I'm really glad you liked it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

metaforize [2014-02-23 21:16:52 +0000 UTC]

First, sorry for my english. Not my mother language.

I don't know why, but some stories just make me think so much. Yours is a fiction, I get it, but it didn't stop me to imagine the main character and not just physically. I imagined a simple home, her favorite tree. I imagined she asleep in his arms and what could possibly had been through his mind while he lead his wife to death. And you know what, besides the sad ending of their romance, I imagined so much more of her possible snark comments and smart-ass answers to him. The nights she would read to him and sometimes he wouldn't like the plot but would pay attention anyway just because of her. I could imagine the relief he said and the loneliness after. She's gone. He's still alive. Or maybe not anymore.


Honestly, I loved it. In the most honest way. So, thanks for making me imagine so much. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to metaforize [2014-02-24 01:24:26 +0000 UTC]

I'm so so glad you loved it. It makes me feel so happy that I connected to you through my writing. I love that you imagined all of this unsaid stuff, which is exactly why it's left unsaid: so that the reader can make their own connections and fill in the background as vividly as they like.


Thanks so much for commenting

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Celvas [2014-01-09 10:11:13 +0000 UTC]

I read your piece as per your suggestion and there are some things that confuse me and two things I think could have been done better.

Beginning: A slow hook. Very drawn out. As if the fish had to follow the boulter in order to find the hook in the first place.

Ending: Abrupt and sudden. There he is with all his guilt - one sentence later he is like: Now let's interpret the situation from an emotionally detached point of view. The guilt part, even though mentioned as a word, is gone. All that is left is the core meaning of the story and not the character.

Reasoning throughout: Why did she have it coming to her so bad? It sounds like, in his eyes, she was a right, you know, bitch. Even the real reason reveal doesn't change that sentence. It doesn't sound any different. At first I thought this was his way of trying to justify what he did: giving her the role of the bad person who had it coming. But then, she had the plague and he admits he knew he had to do it. Her having the plague is a factual reason inside the boundaries of the story. With a fact right there, why did he have to go fictional and invent a whole new one?

The actual killing: First he says she was a messy death, and you know what? That was quite the powerful sentence. 'Crying and begging right up to the end.' How'd she do that, drugged into unconsciousness? I can only assume that she didn't cry and beg for him to kill her due to her illness, because he has to guess that she would have approved of his action.

Uneducated Dickens Quoter: Literary allusions. He seems to be well read and able to stitch a good worthy sentence together. But he doesn't. Why?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Celvas [2014-01-09 11:40:08 +0000 UTC]

In my defence, it remains unedited since writing it out in an exam (except for the removal of the last line, as in the description).


But you have some amazing things to say. I wish others were as critical as you, and now I want to rewrite this story (and I will now, when I have some spare time). You address some really key points that I didn't even really think about. It's surprising that with the attention it got from getting a DD — trust me: this wouldn't've been my first choice, but I'll take what I get, happily — there was never such well-thought out advice.


However, I feel like I have to refute your last point (in the most grateful way possible: you took the time to read this and write an amazing comment/critique, so thank you). You say he seems to be well read. I think "seems" is the key word there. It was his wife who was the well read one. She would read to him. I know from personal experience that people who live with more intellectually-focussed people will often be aware of, and can indeed come across as quite knowledgeable, about certain subjects. However, they themselves may not actually be very academic. Of course, this isn't always the case, but I understand it to at least be a possibility. And plus, I kind of fell in love with the idea of mixing highbrow culture with lowbrow language — I wrote it a year and a half ago, and I still remember that the first few lines just fell into my mind when I saw the stimulus for the exam.


Anyway, thanks for taking a look at this, and for writing such a nice journal on grammar (I'll read pretty much anything on grammar, provided it's well written ). Oh, and for writing one of the best comments ever.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Celvas In reply to BlakeCurran [2014-01-09 13:51:02 +0000 UTC]

Ooooh. That is the nicest reply to a critique I ever got (on deviantART). It was my pleasure to read your story and give you my thoughts. I'm happy they are of use to you. Anyway! I read the story before knowing that it's a school thing. I thought about leaving you a comment to the extend "Not bad for a draft zero", but I figured that would have left you wondering what the heck that's supposed to tell you. So I abandoned my annoyance of being pelted with insults directed at my German heritage and hence English incompetence (or the other way around, actually and curiously) and chose to show you what's behind Door 2. And I still was a bit afraid you'd give it to me like an angry bear protecting its cubs, which always makes a tad uncomfortable. Thank you for not doing that. Then again, I wouldn't have replied in the first place if I had thought you were the type.

I'm afraid I have to refute your refutation. I do not watch wrestling. My fiance does. That way I know a lot about wrestling, the history of wrestling, which wrestler made what history, gimmicks, face/heel turns, some terms, etc. and so on. I can sound like I know my wrestling, because I am the sort of person who listens when others talk, even when the content of what is spoken is of no particular interest to me. More over, I am able to memorize it and pull it out whenever necessary. When people are passionate about something, they will fill in all the gaps they don't know you don't know, because people love to talk. This way, I'm in the wrestling fan club with barely a clue. The thing is, now, that is only the content of what I am saying. I need do adapt my way of speaking, my language, to accommodate the topic. That's what, in my perspective, is lacking. He doesn't adjust his language to what he has been subjected to for many years. He knows the terms, complete sentences. This either shows a remarkable memory or simply that his wife never stopped feeding him knowledge. I find it strange that he can know the recipe for proper language, but never adopts any of it for his every day speech pattern. That's where I am coming from. I'm not really refuting, to be honest, I'm just discussing, I guess.

Ah, dang. There is a much better way to bring my point across than using the wrestling thing. See, before he knew me, my fiance wasn't that good in English. He started off easy enough, adopting some of my swears, because who doesn't love to swear in English. When he saw me playing games in English, he now and then switched to English, too. He even admitted that my playing games in English showed him how flawed translations are, and adopted my habit of watching TV series's and movies in English. He took a lot of it and it reflects. Just by having me around, over the years he adapted.

I will totally admit, however, that this is simply my experience. My perspective. The human mind cannot be neatly summed up into an equation. Thank God for that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Celvas [2014-01-13 05:36:34 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you left a proper response, and not just, "Not bad for a draft zero." I love feedback - whether it's praising or being constructively critical. I can't disagree with anything you've said because you backed it up with evidence. I don't know anything about your heritage, but you express yourself well, and that's all I really care about (in terms of opinion, criticism, etc.).


It's an interesting discussion to have, and, like you say, the human mind cannot be neatly summed up into an equation. And, also, thank God for that.


Thanks again!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BatmanWithBunnyEars [2013-09-21 11:53:00 +0000 UTC]

The plot twist is really clever!  But I don't understand why the grammar is written like it's an uneducated British person from an 1800's story, when there are references to modern things in it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to BatmanWithBunnyEars [2013-09-21 12:58:09 +0000 UTC]

I actually modelled it off a variant on the uneducated Australian male (which is where I'm from), but I guess it works on the inflections you make in your own mind so it's kind of flawed (on my behalf). Sorry about the 1800s British impression! I hope that didn't ruin the experience for you! But then again, it's all about creating a unique narrator, and he was quoting Dickens and Austen in the beginning (mixing canonical texts with lowbrow language) so that might have thrown you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BatmanWithBunnyEars In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-21 13:29:59 +0000 UTC]

That might have gotten me thinking in that direction, yes.  Also, the references to hanging seem out of place in an era with prescription drugs and knee replacements.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to BatmanWithBunnyEars [2013-09-21 22:28:16 +0000 UTC]

It wasn't that he would actually be hanged, he was just saying that like an expression ("string me up like a ham hock" — he just meant, kill him). But thank you for pointing that out!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Poad02 [2013-09-20 15:39:16 +0000 UTC]

 .....You look AND write lovely.      I began reading and went on a wonderful journey with a man who killed the one he loved.  it was shocking, sad, and exciting at the same time. I pitied him. Your story came to life. I truly enjoyed it! Please continue writing, mister!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Poad02 [2013-09-21 01:01:24 +0000 UTC]

You flatter me! I'm so glad you read and enjoyed my piece. And don't worry, I won't stop writing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Poad02 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-21 01:54:55 +0000 UTC]

You best not I want more stories with accents.     And I don't really know where is random fish came from.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Poad02 [2013-09-21 04:22:37 +0000 UTC]

It is a cool random fish though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Poad02 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-21 23:07:11 +0000 UTC]

  I know right??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Poad02 [2013-09-21 23:51:55 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Poad02 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-22 00:46:26 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Poad02 [2013-09-22 00:51:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Poad02 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-22 01:06:52 +0000 UTC]

          

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Poad02 [2013-09-22 01:56:09 +0000 UTC]

Ooh, so much fish!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Poad02 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-22 15:07:04 +0000 UTC]

Fishayy fishaaaay! youtu.be/HKmZhfRmtng I had to.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Poad02 [2013-09-22 20:42:30 +0000 UTC]

Haha! I have never seen that before. Very random McDonald's ad

What about this one?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl85W5…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Poad02 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-22 23:40:22 +0000 UTC]

xD Finding Nemo. Classic. You're pretty cool in my book.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Poad02 [2013-09-23 03:28:03 +0000 UTC]

The best movie about fish

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Poad02 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-23 10:58:11 +0000 UTC]

Agreed!    

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Poad02 [2013-09-23 12:00:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Poad02 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-23 14:47:45 +0000 UTC]

Best character in the whole thing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Poad02 [2013-09-23 20:42:53 +0000 UTC]

Totally! "Just keep swimming, just keep swimming..."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Poad02 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-24 00:29:03 +0000 UTC]

Freaking. Yes. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WillaWombat [2013-09-18 01:20:32 +0000 UTC]

Woah. You are..., this is amazing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to WillaWombat [2013-09-18 01:48:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SkiesInfinite [2013-09-17 23:51:22 +0000 UTC]

I don't often read literary DDs, but I'm so glad I read this one. It's a stunning piece, and I absolutely adore the philosophical elements you employed in it! The twist at the end was great and I could all but hear his accent through the prose. Congratulations on your Daily Deviation, and thank you for posting it for us to enjoy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to SkiesInfinite [2013-09-18 01:49:07 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you read it too, and that you left this lovely comment. Thanks so much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

neurotype-on-discord [2013-09-17 22:21:32 +0000 UTC]

The blend of literary allusions and lowbrow speech made my day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to neurotype-on-discord [2013-09-17 22:31:38 +0000 UTC]

I'm so glad! It was a lot of fun to write Thanks for reading and featuring it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neurotype-on-discord In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-18 00:23:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ink-singer [2013-09-17 21:38:11 +0000 UTC]

Wow this is great! Congratulations on the DD!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to ink-singer [2013-09-17 22:16:01 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ink-singer In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-18 02:43:25 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hawkheart29 [2013-09-17 20:13:31 +0000 UTC]

If I was his wife and I contracted the plague I wouldn't be mad at him for killing me; A shot in the head is a much quicker and less painful way to go than being killed by the disease. It's called mercy killing for a reason, he shouldn't feel guilty. It took a lot of love to do what he did. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Hawkheart29 [2013-09-17 22:20:30 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, exactly! But he would still feel terrible for having to kill the love of his life, right? I guess I was trying to play with the idea of 'innocent until proven guilty', and setting him up as 'obviously' guilty, but then it turns out he's actually not. Do you think I pulled that off?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hawkheart29 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-17 22:46:19 +0000 UTC]

Yes I do. You pulled it off beautifully.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to Hawkheart29 [2013-09-17 22:48:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hawkheart29 In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-18 02:32:01 +0000 UTC]

Welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SCFrankles [2013-09-17 20:08:35 +0000 UTC]

Congratulations on the DD!  


I wish it hadn't taken a DD feature for me to look at this and read it - I really enjoyed it I'm so impressed by the narrator's voice. It absolutely conjures up his personality, and I have a clear view of him in my mind's eye. And, of course, I know how different the character's voice is from your own (well, your written voice, anyway ^^), which only adds to my admiration. I love the way the plot developed, always keeping the reader intrigued. And the narrator is so well-rounded - whether or not the reader approves of his actions, he remains a sympathetic character.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to SCFrankles [2013-09-17 22:30:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much!


He is very different from my own voice (written or otherwise), but it was a lot of fun to write. My whole idea was to play with the idea of right/wrong, innocent/guilty, and leave it up to the reader to decide. I guess, kind of like the judge or jury. And that's why I wrote it in the style of a monologue, with unheard questions being asked and responded to...anyway, sorry for the babble

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SCFrankles In reply to BlakeCurran [2013-09-18 11:11:35 +0000 UTC]

You're not babbling and you know it


The form worked really well, and I think you pitched the story exactly right - allowing readers to make up their own minds. There's nothing worse than having the author looking over your shoulder telling you what you should be feeling ^^ 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlakeCurran In reply to SCFrankles [2013-09-19 07:43:47 +0000 UTC]

I just get really excited about narration. I've noticed that all the best stories have some interesting form of narration or narrator.


Yeah, exactly! Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Damon-Jaxon [2013-09-17 20:00:09 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>