HOME | DD
Brallion — I'm Not a Monkey
Published: 2009-09-14 23:56:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 1234; Favourites: 7; Downloads: 16
Redirect to original
Description
[Created in Inkscape]Apparently, this anthro-raptor has never seen an anthro-human before. I don't believe in evolution, by the way. So don't call me a monkey! And what's with the feathers that are ever-so popular to put on raptors, these days? If they are in anticipation of becoming birds that implies a little more than 'undirected forces,' doesn't it?
If they weren't in Jurassic Park I and II, but suddenly appeared by Jurassic Park III... Anywho. Both of these characters are mine; please don't steal. Enjoy!
Related content
Comments: 17
What an insensitive dino 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
They have found feathers on some raptor fossils. I think that's why some raptor restorations have feathers.
But as far as evolution/fossils go, ~AbyssalJT and I think God is like an artist. He started with a base and changed the design to fit. what didn't work, he got rid of and fixed. And kept what worked. He worked very hard on us. He tried a lot of things, but like when we work on art, we tweak and tweak until we get what we like.
That's what we think about the whole evolution thing and the lack of transitional fossils. God didn't make a transition, He experimented and tweaked until He was happy with the result. Like an eraser or painting over.
What do you think?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
The major problem with this approach is that it assumes God was unable to get something right the first time. If God is omniscient, He knows everything that can be known, including what would and would not work in the environment He created.
I think if you tweak your explanation a bit, you'll have something more theologically sound.
I'm not sure about your comment regarding the lack of transitional fossils. Could you provide a rational basis for this? I've not heard your suggestion before.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Yeah, I just answered my own question in realizing that all life on earth is related because we all have the same Father. He made all of us.
So were not monkeys, but were still their brothers and sisters, because He made us all.
I think that's the real answer to the whole debate and the rest is human curiosity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I used the wording I did because "didn't work" implies wrongness. Something to think about. The second explanation you gave was more understandable than the first.
I know what transitional fossils are (or aren't), but what I meant was that I had never heard your explanation before and wanted your reasoning for it. My apologies if that was unclear.
Your latest comment runs into theologically shaky ground again, though. The Bible never suggests that humans and animals are related in that sense; in fact, it specifically sets humans apart.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"I know what transitional fossils are (or aren't), but what I meant was that I had never heard your explanation before and wanted your reasoning for it. My apologies if that was unclear."
Well to answer that is the Creationists use the lack of transitional fossils as an argument against evolution. I don't know much else.
"Your latest comment runs into theologically shaky ground again, though. The Bible never suggests that humans and animals are related in that sense; in fact, it specifically sets humans apart."
We are God's chosen creation, but all Creation does have the same Father. I don't mean it in the biological sense that scientists would try to solve and categorize.
What being related to other creation means is the fact that we are all one family and we take care of each other. God made animals to help us and us to help them. We are the gardeners of this planet. It doesn't matter (personally) whether we evolved or not. That's being preoccupied with the past, what matters is the future with God in your heart.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Its not about God being wrong, its about Him changing His mind. Just like when we artist tweak our work, that's what God did with life on Earth and continues to do today. Fixes it until He likes it, its not about being wrong. Artist know what they want to create, but they can change their minds at any time.
Creationists cite about the lack of transitional fossil organisms, missing links from one species to another. That's all I know about it. I think if you google it you'll find more information.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I think that each creature is a creation. I don't think it was an experiment to see which features he wanted to keep for 'later' animals. That would imply that none of his '
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I just thought of something. All life here on earth is related. Why? We all have the same Father! So I think the whole evolution vs. creation get shot out the window with that. We're all brothers and sisters.
So were not monkeys, but related to them because their Father is our Father, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Everyone is entitled to what they think, but only God really knows what happened. So I think we'll never know the answer in this life and we'll be lucky if we can ask him when we go home.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yes he "is" a monkey and that is some fantastic work! Great color and concept.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
about jurassic park
Didja know that no character is in all 3 movies?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Was he actually IN the last one? I don't remember it too well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
He was in III, wasn't he? *ponders*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0