HOME | DD

Brenna-yo β€” Study of Mickey.

Published: 2009-06-01 10:59:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 162; Favourites: 1; Downloads: 29
Redirect to original
Description Study of Mickey. (:
Inspired by Eadweard Muybridge
Related content
Comments: 12

justMANGO [2009-12-23 20:03:19 +0000 UTC]

When I saw this as a thumbnail in your gallery, I thought "hey this reminds me of Muybridge"; and then I saw the line "Inspired by Eadweard Muybridge". I just want to say, you captured Muybridge's motion studies' feel very accurately. Kudos!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

endzs [2009-09-15 16:50:26 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely loveit!
It's amazing! (:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Brenna-yo In reply to endzs [2009-09-16 04:04:34 +0000 UTC]

Thankyou so much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DrRelth [2009-06-01 19:23:31 +0000 UTC]

I love this! XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Brenna-yo In reply to DrRelth [2009-06-02 00:44:29 +0000 UTC]

Thankyou very much, love!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chiiildd [2009-06-01 11:04:37 +0000 UTC]

This is really different for you.
Very impressive.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Brenna-yo In reply to chiiildd [2009-06-02 00:36:56 +0000 UTC]

I know, I've been experimenting with my ideas a lot lately (:
Thankyou very much brosepham!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

chiiildd In reply to Brenna-yo [2009-06-02 01:01:14 +0000 UTC]

Google: Results 1 - 5 of 5 for brosepham.

Hmm... nope, still don't know what it means. XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Brenna-yo In reply to chiiildd [2009-06-02 01:36:12 +0000 UTC]

Hahah, it's a Brenna word.
I would explain it, but it would be too complex for your imagination.
Your brain would probably implode. Or explode, depending on how you interpret it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

chiiildd In reply to Brenna-yo [2009-06-02 01:59:51 +0000 UTC]

...Well, you KNOW that's not true. We're on the same wave length (example: the Santa/Maori/beard thing)... NOTHING is too complex for me, except SchrΓΆdinger's cat, which is FAR too silly to be understood.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Brenna-yo In reply to chiiildd [2009-06-05 00:23:17 +0000 UTC]

That's true... I must say, the whole 'Santa/Maori/Beard' thing was pretty intense.
Buuttt, 'brosepham' can only be explained with a minimum of 277 words, and i reaaaally can't be bothered writing that out.


ChrΓΆdinger's Cat: A cat, along with a flask containing a poison, is placed in a sealed box shielded against environmentally induced quantum decoherence. If an internal Geiger counter detects radiation then the flask is shattered, releasing the poison which kills the cat. The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics implies that after a while the cat is simultaneously alive and dead. Yet, when we look in the box, we see the cat either alive or dead, not a mixture of alive and dead.

^
^
^
What the hell... this is ridiculously silly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

chiiildd In reply to Brenna-yo [2009-06-05 08:21:59 +0000 UTC]

I KNOW!
My friend at work was trying to explain it to me, and I was like "No, no that's silly. No." and our Manager asked what was silly, so I told him "Shcwarzycoffs Cat." and Sean corrected it to "Schrodinger's Cat" ... and then, my freakin Manager started to try and explain it to me! I walked off in disgust, then Sean (my friend) and my Manager just stood around for ten minutes discussing it!!

The whole world is silly, and I'm one of few sane people!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0