HOME | DD

Published: 2011-04-03 10:26:06 +0000 UTC; Views: 41094; Favourites: 734; Downloads: 1599
Redirect to original
Description
As a lifelong fan of the original 1941 Lon Chaney Jr. version of "The Wolf Man", I naturally had mixed feelings about the 2010 remake, starring Benicio Del Toro. Of course the most important thing to me, was for the filmmakers to just please, please, please - get the character of the Wolf Man himself right - which they certainly did. So I applauded the remake for that, from the first viewing. But I also nit-picked everything else about it to death. Every deviation from the original story (and there were some major ones) felt like a grave error to me. I guess that's just what us movie fans do when one of our old favorites gets re-made in a modern version.I should know better. I've read plenty of accounts of 1960's horror fans who were up in arms about the remake of Dracula staring some new guy named Christopher Lee. And yet today, most of us 21st Century horror fans hold the Christopher Lee version of Dracula in the same high regard as the classic Bela Lugosi version. I think the lesson is, movie remakes are a shock to the system for the fan who has spent years in love with the original version. A lot of time must pass before we can judge a remake fairly.
Well, the Wolf Man character himself was treated so well in the 2010 remake that I kept going back for repeated viewings, just to see him in action, again and again, despite the film's other shortcomings. But with these repeat viewings I have found more and more to like about the 2010 Wolf Man. What can I tell ya - this movie has grown on me a lot. I've forgiven most of its changes to the original story and come to accept it as its own thing. And it has slowly become one of my favorite new horror movies from the past decade.
No, it is not a perfect film by any stretch, but it treated my old friend the Wolf Man with respect and didn't make a joke out of him. In fact it made him very cool and let him kill a lot of people with plenty of blood and gore - and reminded the world what a good old fashioned werewolf is capable of. And for that I love it.
There's a scene in the movie where Larry Talbot is in an insane asylum. He goes crazy and experiences a weird montage of hallucinatory images, one of which is a 3-second, "blink-and-you'll-miss-it" shot of his friend Gwen sitting naked on a bed. I have always been a sucker for stories about Monsters longing for the beautiful girl they can never have. So I decided to do an illustration of that striking moment, but with the Wolf Man clutching hold of her - as if Larry had injected himself into his own dream of Gwen. So sad...
Anyway there ya go.
Related content
Comments: 187
king2wolves In reply to ??? [2011-04-05 16:31:14 +0000 UTC]
Maybe it could be part of the story in the next volume? A little romance in the night.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to king2wolves [2011-04-05 18:32:47 +0000 UTC]
Haha... Is that what readers of my monster comics really want to see?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
king2wolves In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-05 20:22:32 +0000 UTC]
Maybe we're all tired of teen-angst monster romance(twilight), and we're looking for something more....adult.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
king2wolves In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-05 20:19:28 +0000 UTC]
Maybe we're all tired of teen-angst monster romance(twilight), and we're looking for something more....adult.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to king2wolves [2011-04-05 20:48:58 +0000 UTC]
You mean you didn't get enough of that in "Wulf and Batsy Volume 2: Lustmord Nightmares"?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
king2wolves In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-06 01:40:54 +0000 UTC]
Your work(Wulf & Batsy) is for TRUE horror fans. Twilight is for the neutered or the celibate fans of the horror genre. No offense, if you like Twilight.
Thats why i'm patiently, yet eagerly, waitng the next volume. So good luck.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to king2wolves [2011-04-06 06:42:52 +0000 UTC]
Ha, thank you for your compliments on my work. Progress on the next volume has been slow. Too much of my life has been eaten up by my day job (doing storyboards on "Transformers: Prime"), and other things that happened this year, like buying a house. But I keep plugging away at it. I'm about a 3rd of the way done with Wulf and Batsy Volume 3. And I try to draw a couple new pages every weekend. Weekends are the only free time I have left anymore.
I've always said movies like "Twilight" are horror movies for people who don't like horror. "I Know What You Did Last Summer" and all those other bloodless 1990's horror movies, starring actresses from TV shows popular with 14 year old girls, are in the same category.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Devin-Lannigan In reply to ??? [2011-04-04 01:50:14 +0000 UTC]
Wicked man ! I got pretty pumped when I saw this one ! The lighting of the moon is so awesome in it !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to Devin-Lannigan [2011-04-04 03:37:38 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Yeah I was trying to be more bold with my lighting on this illustration. Planning to try more of this same trick in the future.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Devin-Lannigan In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-04 17:56:08 +0000 UTC]
IT looks pretty sweet ! Im excited to see more
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to Devin-Lannigan [2011-04-04 19:57:49 +0000 UTC]
Stay tuned. More to come, over the next few weeks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Devin-Lannigan In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-05 16:02:19 +0000 UTC]
Awesome ! I'm super exited ! I'll try to get some up too
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mdizzle999872 In reply to ??? [2011-04-04 01:21:21 +0000 UTC]
Nice to see somebody else who liked the movie. :
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to mdizzle999872 [2011-04-04 03:37:59 +0000 UTC]
I'm a sucker for the Wolfman.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mdizzle999872 In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-04 04:00:20 +0000 UTC]
Yeah! Here's to the first werewolf to hit the silverscreen
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RayMax90 In reply to ??? [2011-04-04 00:34:47 +0000 UTC]
I liked the story, that was really well done, I was really disappointed ith the wolfman himself though. thought he looed better in the original.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to RayMax90 [2011-04-04 03:39:22 +0000 UTC]
Your feelings and mine are exactly opposite then. I thought the WolfMan himself was spectacular in the remake. It was the story that was full of problems (in my opinion). That said, if we are just talking looks - I think he looks great in both old and new versions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RayMax90 In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-05 12:09:48 +0000 UTC]
I thought the transformation sequences were amazing, i just expected a bit more with the finished product. i enjoyed the movie, don't get me wrong, i just thought it lacked something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BryanBaugh In reply to da-parrot-masta [2011-04-03 23:39:49 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I wish I still had it. But alas it has been lost to history.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cresent34 In reply to ??? [2011-04-03 21:34:04 +0000 UTC]
I have to admit, the remake certainly had its' moments...particularly the scene where the detective played by Hugo Weaving (sorry, I forgot what his character's name was) tried to order 'a pint of bitter' in the pub, much to the consternation of the villagers..
That said, not bad..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nero-Manson In reply to ??? [2011-04-03 20:49:06 +0000 UTC]
The Wolfman was the first non slasher horror film that i loved when i was a kid (i still do),and i thought the remake did the original justice,(the theatrical version was ok,but the unrated version was the superior film),but as alway's Bryan fantastic work
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nero-Manson In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-03 20:57:11 +0000 UTC]
You dont need to thank me man,i should be thanking you for sharing this great piece with us
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to Nero-Manson [2011-04-03 21:01:19 +0000 UTC]
Aww hell, you flatter me too much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nero-Manson In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-03 21:03:02 +0000 UTC]
Haha,anyway great work man
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KurtBelcher1 In reply to ??? [2011-04-03 20:25:32 +0000 UTC]
Really wonderful work. I agree with pretty much everything you say about the movie. Not perfect, but very interesting in its own right. And you're right, I was amazed by how violent they let the movie be. I had foreseen a toned-down, 'tame' version of the story, but they really went all-out with it and left the Wolf Man BE a wolf man. One of my other favorite elements was Anthony Hopkins as the elder Talbot. I thought it was one of his best, most distinct role in years.
Anyhow, great stuff!
KAB
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to KurtBelcher1 [2011-04-03 20:48:58 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I agree with almost everything you said - especially concerning the violence and gore content. That was excellent. My only big difference of opinion is, I expected Anthony Hopkins to be wonderful in the film and was disappointed with him. Whether or not he did a good acting job is debatable and I won't go into that. The bigger reason I was disappointed with his role in the movie had to do with the story choice of having him turn out to be the werewolf who bit Larry. Which, okay, I admit - is not the actor's fault but the writer's.
In the 1941 Wolf Man film - which I've been watching since I was 6 years old so it's naturally burned into my brain as a sacred text - the character of Sir John Talbot was a thoroughly good, classy man and the voice of reason. He genuinely loved and cared for his son Larry. Having Sir John turn out to be the werewolf who bit Larry is like doing a remake of Star Wars where Obi Wan Kenobi turns to the dark side first and then talks Anakin Skywalker into doing the same thing. That's too big of a leap away from the original version for me.
It is also annoyingly typical of modern Hollywood's apparent need to make everything in a story connect together like a house of cards. Filmmakers apparently can't accept the notion of a random tragedy. Which was part of what made the original 1941 Wolf Man so sad. The guy didn't deserve it. Nothing in his life suggested that this would happen to him. Bad luck just came out of nowhere and cursed him.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KurtBelcher1 In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-03 21:07:41 +0000 UTC]
Yep, gotta agree with the idea of him being the original werewolf. It was an attempt to make a 'nice twist' and, as you said, tie everything together needlessly. I, for one, am more than okay with leaving questions unanswered. Tying things up into a nice, neat bow isn't always needed. Most especially not in this case. But yeah, I thought Hopkins did really well with what he was given.
KAB
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GioVega In reply to ??? [2011-04-03 19:32:25 +0000 UTC]
Amazing!i was wondering when you were gonna take a crack at this one.It looks great, as always
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MAN08 In reply to ??? [2011-04-03 19:21:03 +0000 UTC]
I was kinda disappointed by the movie but I really liked the attempt of bringing werewolves out of action and back into horror.
Great picture!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Crocazill In reply to ??? [2011-04-03 19:08:58 +0000 UTC]
I loved the special effects in the new one, Rick Baker's take on the Wolfman was flawless. I didn't buy Anthony Hopkins as a werewolf, though. He kind of looked like a rabid Ewok. I think if they had taken the plot of the original and updated the effects then we would have had a spectacular film. The thing that pissed me off, though, was when Joe Johnston was being interviewed for "Captain America" and he said that "The Wolfman" was just a paycheck to him.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GeotrixQueen [2011-04-03 18:24:40 +0000 UTC]
I'm glad that Rick Baker got an award for the film. If anybody deserves a make-up oscar, it's him.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DocRedfield In reply to ??? [2011-04-03 17:24:30 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I agree with all of the above, man... perfect account of how this movie is better than its initial impressions (and I really dig the extra scenes in the director's cut), and a great drawing based on the (sexy as hell) dream sequence. Bravo, as always!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to DocRedfield [2011-04-03 19:30:38 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much for your compliments on my illustration... And I appreciate your thoughts on the film itself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
StephenJames138 In reply to ??? [2011-04-03 16:21:24 +0000 UTC]
Wow. Looks brilliant! Great job man! Couldn't agree more on the movie too. Certainly not without its flaws, but the design of the Wolfman is both faithful and brilliant in it's own right.
My biggest gripe with the film, even more so than the ropey plot. Is the missed opportunity to surpass An American Werewolf in London with the best werewolf transformation sequence. Imagine if they'd give Rick Baker the freedom to do all the transformation effects and seamlessly blended them with cg!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to StephenJames138 [2011-04-03 19:42:17 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for your kind words on my art!! I agree about Rick Baker. I want to meet him just to tell him thanks for doing everything he did with the Wolf Man. That said, I didn't have any real problems with the cg transformations because they looked pretty good for the most part, and had a lot of interesting new ideas in them (Seeing the actual pigment of his skin changing from human flesh color to grey wolf-skin, before the hair grew in over it, Seeing his human teeth re-arranging themselves to make room for his bigger, wolfish teeth). I don't think the transformations suffered from the sterile flatness that often infects cg effects at all.
Let's put it this way: Before I saw the film I had heard rumors (apparently untrue) that the transformations would be prosthetic Rick Baker effects enhanced with cgi - and when I watched the movie the first time I assumed that's what I was seeing. And I've got a pretty good eye for effects work. So if the fully-cgi transformations could fool me, I'm not going to fault them just for being cgi. Like everything else in movies, cgi CAN be a beautiful thing when it is used correctly... and I think it was, here.
I had a lot of gripes about the movie (and still have a few that bug me) but they are all story-based things. I agree there were many "missed moments" but I think they had less to do with effects and a lot more to do with character stuff.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StephenJames138 In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-03 22:45:40 +0000 UTC]
Ahh i hate going back on my word, but damn you make a good case sir, haha.
I agree there are some things only possible with cg, and i am 100% not a hater of it. In fact quite the opposite, when used properly the results can be amazing.
And to be honest the way the film is i don't actually see where such a (American Werewolf) scene could have fit in.
However. Like you pointed out, the cg transformation actually looks pretty darn good. Like the way his tongue lashes out, his fingers snapping back and what not. Had a cool almost comic like look to it. But I also consider myself to have an eye for effects and as cool as it all looked, there wasn't one cg shot of the Wolfman that i didn't realise was cg. A lot of it is just common sense, most people tend to notice when something looks not quite right or a tad far fetched. Like in Ang Lee's Hulk, some shots of Hulk in the desert are unbelievable, skin textures, hair and everything look pretty much photo realistic. But we know that big green guy is cg no matter how real he looks.
The cg in the Wolfman works as a whole cos i feel the whole film has an almost artificial/stylized look to it, especially the London roof top scenes.
Kind of off the point now, hah. I agree with what you said, i guess what i was getting at is, i would just have liked to see such a scene. But for that to happen The Wolfman would have had to be a very different film from the get go :]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BryanBaugh In reply to StephenJames138 [2011-04-03 23:51:07 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I know what you mean, it would be very, very interesting to see what Rick Baker might have come up with transformation-wise. Especially considering that the much-celebrated tf scene in "American Werewolf" was done so long ago (1981... damn that makes me feel so old). Just imagine what he would have come up with now, between the knowledge and skill he's accumulated after all those years, and wanting to do something new and interesting to make this film unique from "American Werewolf"...
I also agree with you that the stylized "un-reality" of the whole film helps the cgi feel more "real" within the context of an unreal world.
On a side note -- I was surprised when I watched one of the "behind the scenes" documentaries and found out that a lot of that "running on all fours" stuff was NOT faked with cgi - but largely done with Del Toro actually running on all fours & attached to wires supporting him from above. CG shots were apparently only used to bridge those practical effects or for big moments like leaping in the air while in mid-run. Pretty amazing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StephenJames138 In reply to BryanBaugh [2011-04-04 18:10:34 +0000 UTC]
Yeah totally man, i even thought the shots of him running on two legs, but moving really fast had been altered. Then i watched the extras to find them pulling him on some carpet thing. Really clever stuff.
Even more off the point, but a recent example of me watching a film and thinking how the hell have they done that. Was the scene in Inception with Joseph Gordon-Levitt flying through the corridor. Looks fantastic!
Anyways, haha. Awesome picture man and nice to hear from someone with valid opinions and who knows there shit :]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>