HOME | DD

C0D3R3AP3R — RANT-II

Published: 2010-05-18 15:48:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 5689; Favourites: 30; Downloads: 72
Redirect to original
Description Another version of this deviation
Another version
Another version

Please don't sue.
Related content
Comments: 66

C0D3R3AP3R In reply to ??? [2010-06-01 14:32:03 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xoja [2010-05-25 11:44:44 +0000 UTC]

Essentially art theft.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C0D3R3AP3R In reply to xoja [2010-05-25 12:03:56 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!
I will buy you a cookie

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to C0D3R3AP3R [2010-05-25 12:16:20 +0000 UTC]

Don't worry, it's been reported <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C0D3R3AP3R In reply to xoja [2010-05-25 12:19:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks again!
Hope you have reported the other versions also.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to C0D3R3AP3R [2010-05-25 12:24:12 +0000 UTC]

You've copied xyphid WORD FOR WORD.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-28 06:37:23 +0000 UTC]

Whats sad, is that even though this is a copy, its better looking, and conveys the message in a more forceful manner.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-28 08:10:52 +0000 UTC]

Sorry, but, it really doesn't. haha.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-28 08:53:04 +0000 UTC]

And with that statement, you tell me how deep (or the lack thereof) your visionary sight is.

...As well as your apparent, 'dry humour' (obvious lack thereof).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-28 11:16:29 +0000 UTC]

The colour scheme is disgusting. The font choice is awful. The layout is bizarre.

Bye now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-28 16:19:16 +0000 UTC]

Heh... And whats more:

Is that the 'layout' is the same as Xyphids. =/

Think before you speak bro. It'll get you into uncomfortable situations sometimes, I think...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-28 20:10:01 +0000 UTC]

It isn't.

The bar along the bottom throws the balance off resulting in this being the inferior piece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-28 23:55:56 +0000 UTC]

Its called asymmetrical balance bro.

You learn about it gradeschool art. =/

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-29 09:42:57 +0000 UTC]

Derp. I'm not an idiot.

It doesn't work here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-29 22:49:52 +0000 UTC]

Sorry bro sis, just another insight to your 'vision'.

Besides, if its so horrible, why aren't you bitching about it to =xyphid so it'll get taken down? =/ [go complain, I even provided linkage]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-30 15:04:31 +0000 UTC]



Wow, you're thick.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-30 22:53:10 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah... thats right, he's tired of people like you bitching about it, huh? (I read his deviation description).

Plus, you need to lighten up dude. Pull your giant ego out of your ass, and stop feedin' the trolls (me). Because I think you're hillarious.

Although, I haven't seen you resort to insulting my art, such as other people would've done so.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-31 08:11:26 +0000 UTC]

I do know the boy, you nonce.

What ego? Making stuff up now, mate.

At least I can spell "hilarious", I suppose.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-31 20:24:00 +0000 UTC]

Hillarious can be spelled with a u, as with colour, and honour, and armour, and favourite (which can also be spelled without the e in some parts of Europe).

=/

Lemme guess, you also would tell me I'm spelling 'coothe' incorrectly too, eh?

Obviously, if you know the boy, he either doesn't care enough about yoiur opinion, nor the DA staff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-31 21:09:14 +0000 UTC]

One l. <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-31 21:22:59 +0000 UTC]

spellcheck what you say bro. =/

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-31 21:31:45 +0000 UTC]

Learn to spell. <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-31 21:43:30 +0000 UTC]

Let me just take this time to say no homo. =/

Lighten up bro.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-31 21:55:08 +0000 UTC]

<3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-31 22:04:43 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-28 16:13:26 +0000 UTC]

-___-

Speaks volumes about you as a designer bro...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-28 20:10:21 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I disagree with you so I must be wrong.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-28 23:59:43 +0000 UTC]

No, it says that I don't like your style, critique and sense of humour. =/

Stop being so auto-accusatory bro.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-29 09:43:17 +0000 UTC]

Boohoo.

And stop calling me bro. Cheers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-29 22:45:15 +0000 UTC]

Sorry sis.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-30 15:04:18 +0000 UTC]

Funny bugger.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Halfingr In reply to xoja [2010-05-30 22:53:47 +0000 UTC]

Why thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xoja In reply to Halfingr [2010-05-31 08:11:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rangga19 [2010-05-25 10:57:05 +0000 UTC]

love it...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C0D3R3AP3R In reply to rangga19 [2010-05-25 10:58:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kyotosorae [2010-05-25 09:28:29 +0000 UTC]

i agree! >:] they should pay respect to designers!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C0D3R3AP3R In reply to kyotosorae [2010-05-25 10:29:40 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kyotosorae In reply to C0D3R3AP3R [2010-05-25 10:39:15 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

edeziner [2010-05-24 16:21:53 +0000 UTC]

As far is critique is concerned, negative space has not been used effectively. Although i'm a big appreciater of using negative space but here im geting the feeling of something missing. Or you could have used rather larger text to fill up this thing. Or eleminate the bottom red and white strip. Text compostion and color usage is perfectly right.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C0D3R3AP3R In reply to edeziner [2010-05-25 00:51:41 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the suggestion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

edeziner [2010-05-24 16:16:56 +0000 UTC]

now this is something which we all artists and designers hve been needing to fight for our rights. Good job.

Well written copy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RGC3 [2010-05-23 21:55:50 +0000 UTC]

Why do people feel the need to remake already genius art? What the fuck is the point?

It seems like a waste of time to me--not to mention the fact that the original was plenty good on its own.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C0D3R3AP3R In reply to RGC3 [2010-05-24 00:45:30 +0000 UTC]

It maybe a waste of time for you but not for me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RGC3 In reply to C0D3R3AP3R [2010-05-24 20:21:54 +0000 UTC]

It's an uncreative, entirely unoriginal concept. Why bother?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C0D3R3AP3R In reply to RGC3 [2010-05-25 00:49:48 +0000 UTC]

I don't care. Keep it with you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JWDesignCenter [2010-05-23 16:23:40 +0000 UTC]

While I wholeheartedly agree that art gives us the right to express how we feel and a way to do it safely with expression, and I also agree that some clients typically are uneducated and naive in how they perceive artists and designers and how they utilize us in their projects. While I can sympathize with you with your feelings - this isn't going to solve anything. Clients need education. They need to be shown why they shouldn't use you as a button pusher or screw driver. It is your responsibility as the artist and expert to guide them, to teach them, to show them that there's a reason they hired YOU to do the work. Otherwise, you are just as guilty for perpetuating the endless client-designer intercommunication loop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Sonicbeanz In reply to JWDesignCenter [2010-05-24 09:02:29 +0000 UTC]

write that comment on the original one [link] and see how much he gives a fuck.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

C0D3R3AP3R In reply to JWDesignCenter [2010-05-23 16:54:57 +0000 UTC]

I totally agree with the responsibility of an artist while guiding a client. I can't agree to your words that clients are typically uneducated in the sense they maybe noobs with art but they will be more educated or experienced in other aspects. So, as an artist, one shouldn't bear such thoughts in mind. Correct me if I'm wrong.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C0D3R3AP3R In reply to C0D3R3AP3R [2010-05-23 16:56:11 +0000 UTC]

And a big thanks for your valuable comment

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

powerbuffy [2010-05-23 10:23:49 +0000 UTC]

great job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>