HOME | DD
Cat-man-dancing — Democrats Part II
#democrat #hypocrite #liars #liberal #sjw
Published: 2018-01-07 04:38:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 384; Favourites: 12; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Thanks to Anon.Related content
Comments: 36
With the Clinton's that not even scratching the surface. . .that's discovering there is a surface. . .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It certainly reaches far beyond than just the Clintons
themselves. They are only a visible part of the entire
decadence going around.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yup. Because one bad thing totally excuses Trump constantly being a complete piece of shit. Because two wrongs like, cancel each other out, right? Fuck personal responsibility, and all that shit- if somebody is bad across the aisle, then that's your cue to be just as bad and get away with it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I won't put up profanity and abusive language on my page.
If you need such to support your statements, you're too weak.
Clean up or be blocked.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
In other words, "he used bad words so I'll use that as an excuse to ignore the point he just made".
Cheap, weak, and cowardly. Two wrongs do not make a right, and you'd never accept the same argument if it came from my side of the fence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nope. He could have made his points without being offensive.
It demonstrates the weakness of his argument that he didn't.
You could have also, but you chose not to.
You should have read the rules. No childish name calling. My
tolerance of poo-flinging is now zero.
Go away.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hmm, the Dumbocrats are truly the zenith of hypocrisy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The only thing I’d say you got wrong was Obama being solely responsible for giving guns to mexican drug lords, that’s been going on since 2006. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gu…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
???
Quote the part where I said that Obama was solely responsible?
It says above that he did it, and he did.
It doesn't say that he was the only one. He wasn't.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The way it’s worded you make it sound like he was the one that started it not continued.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sorry that it was unclear. But I really don't see a problem.
For the record, I don't agree with any president doing it.
But past actions don't excuse current actions if they're both wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Barely even the tip of the iceberg.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
> Literally no one is trying to or is defending Ted you dumbass. That event took place in 1969... and you're trying to use it as an argument NOW.
> You realize Trump also cheated on his wives right? Not just one, not just oral sex, but full on cheating where he had kids.
> Did you get this from a fucing Alex Jones article? When the fuck did Obama do that? I'm pretty sure that would be a big story if it was real no? You can argue "oh well the msm didn't want to cover it!" all you want but guess what, there are other news networks outside of the US who would've covered it if it actually.... yeah know... happened? Do you not do any fact checking before posting or are you too lazy to actually do research?
> Biden had that one awkward moment but I don't recall anything like that. If he did then shame on him. However Trump also violated women... HE EVEN TALKED DOING SO IN THE TRUMP TAPES that he now questions the legitimacy of... even though he already admitted they were legit.
> All but the email shit is just flat out bullshit. You are on Alex Jones level autism here kid.
> No one is defending John nor are they justifying him. There's a difference between someone doing a bad thing and facing consequences and someone doing something wrong and pretending like it never happened or defending them (AKA whenever Trump does something stupid).
> No one is defending Rob you donkey. Why are you trying to argue that democrats are as inappropriate as republicans are with Trump when it's not even an equal comparison.
> Anthony Weiner? Seriously? Who the fuck defended him? No one.
Whoever this anon was who sent you this must've gotten this from some far right facebook page where they live in their own little bubble. No research was done whatsoever and you seemingly don't even care. This is why people outside of the US make fun of republicans... because they are retarded.
👍: 1 ⏩: 3
Okay, lemme throw my hat in the ring here.
I never really read up on the Ted Kennedy thing, but I do know that JFK slept with Marilyn Monroe and had ties with the Mafia.
I'm gonna need to see a source on that one.
It was a whole big scandal called "Fast & Furious". Probably not named after the movies, but I remember Fox News making a big stink about it too. And the billions (whether directly or indirectly) went to those people under the guise of "foreign aid". We ship shitloads of money to people who fuckin hate us and wanna wipe us off the face of the planet. IRAN NUKE DEAL, anyone?
There's a big fuckin difference between SAYING and actually DOING. Trump's always had this larger-than-life presence ever since the beginning. And don't you find it at least a little suspicious that the tapes FROM 2005 happened to surface less than a month before the election? Really makes you think.......
I've seen pictures of HRC AIDS actually taking hammers to said cellular devices. The video thing is also 100% true, there's probably clips of it around YouTube, unless the left-wing silencing machine struck them down. The nuclear material? Once again, IRAN NUKE DEAL.
I honestly don't give a shit about Edwards, what he did was reprehensible and he paid the price. Enough said.
I have no idea what the Blagojevich thing is about. If they mean it as some sort of political favor thing, yeah, that sort of backroom politicking is immoral on every level. If they're just talking about selling a literal chair, I won't complain. Wouldn't mind having one of those chairs in my living room. ^.^
And rightfully so. Same with Harvey Weinstein. Nopony's gonna fucking defend serial rapists.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"I never really read up on the Ted Kennedy thing, but I do know that JFK slept with Marilyn Monroe and had ties with the Mafia."
I don't care what JFK or Ted did, that was in the past. It's like trying to argue that democrats are the racist party because they were for slavery 1861.
"I'm gonna need to see a source on that one."
www.vanityfair.com/magazine/20…
www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/0…
www.theatlantic.com/politics/a…
It's not even that hard to learn. He's had three wives, they were all trophy wives as well.
"It was a whole big scandal called "Fast & Furious". Probably not named after the movies, but I remember Fox News making a big stink about it too. And the billions (whether directly or indirectly) went to those people under the guise of "foreign aid". We ship shitloads of money to people who fuckin hate us and wanna wipe us off the face of the planet. IRAN NUKE DEAL, anyone?"
D-Do you even know what the Iran Nuclear Deal was ABOUT???? Are you serious? I know about the quote on quote "Fast and Furious" scandal. However only people who listen to only right wing media think it's a scandal: www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-wa… . It really isn't, there was no evidence of it being a scandal, more just a failure on the Justice Department's fault. I also suggest seeking better sources than the people who brought the "no go zones" myth to the masses.
"There's a big fuckin difference between SAYING and actually DOING. "
He talked about kissing and touching women... not just wanting to but actually doing it.
"Trump's always had this larger-than-life presence ever since the beginning. "
That doesn't excuse sexual assault you dingus.
" And don't you find it at least a little suspicious that the tapes FROM 2005 happened to surface less than a month before the election? Really makes you think......."
If you're in such denial that Trump could do anything wrong maybe you'd think like that. But when both people who were on the tapes ADMIT THEY WERE REAL you just then months later go back on what you said for no reason seemingly.
"I've seen pictures of HRC AIDS actually taking hammers to said cellular devices. The video thing is also 100% true, there's probably clips of it around YouTube, unless the left-wing silencing machine struck them down. The nuclear material? Once again, IRAN NUKE DEAL."
How interesting that a video that 100% totally really exists yet you can't provide a single solid piece of evidence. You said there's most likely clips on youtube. If you are making the claim you provide the evidence. Mostly because the concept itself is stupid. Not even Alex Jones said they used hammers so who knows where you got that idea from. Once again you show how ignorant you are of what the deal actually was. I suggest actually looking into something before you come up with conspiricy theories on how you can use it against democrats: www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-…
"I honestly don't give a shit about Edwards, what he did was reprehensible and he paid the price. Enough said."
I don't give a shit about Edwards either. So why are we bringing him up? No one is defending him so why use it as some sort of argument?
"And rightfully so. Same with Harvey Weinstein. Nopony's gonna fucking defend serial rapists."
If he was a right wing politician maybe. Hell Trump talked about touching and kissing women without consent and he won the election.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, you're right. Slavery WAS in the past. I just wish you Regressives could see THAT that way, the same way you seem to gloss over your own party's faults in mere days. Yet somehow you want us white guys to feel guilty for things our ancestors did 150 years ago? There is nopony alive now who was a slave. There is nopony alive now who owned slaves. And aren't we forgetting LBJ's infamous quote of "We'll have those n*ggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years", in regards to passing the Civic Rights Act? Has it occurred to you that every single vote AGAINST that act came from Democrats? This "Big Switch" you speak of is a farce. Today the racism lives on in policies that cripple our African-American populace. Single motherhood runs rampant. Welfare programs can net you more money than working a minimum wage job. Failing inner-city schools and awful Common Core standards. Sounds like dystopia to me.
And sure, three wives is a lot, but ever heard of this thing called "divorce"? Happens a lot more than the idealist in me would like to think, but it's a common occurrence. And unless you're a raging SJW, the fact that they were all bombshells shouldn't piss you off. So what if they're hot? Really, so what?
Not only that, but I've noticed that the women who "came forward" with allegations all either stopped pursuing it or it was proved that they were lying for attention. Not to mention THOSE also only came in before the election. If that shit happened, wouldn't you wanna come out with it as soon as possible? Unlike in the case of Bill Clinton where Swillary actively silenced victims of Bill's little Bill, going as far as to call Ms. Monica Lewinsky (who is a rather respectable woman) "a loon", and levy threats against other would-be accusers. For somepony who's supposedly "all about women's rights" and "she has the right to be believed", she sure doesn't seem to practice that which she preaches. And how do we KNOW, for a FACT, that any of this was done? How do we know he wasn't just fluffing his ego and overblowing his sex life in front of the shiny reporter?
In the Iran thing, we know they're gonna start making bombs as soon as the inspectors pull out. Hell, they're denying inspectors already. Seems pretty shady to me.
Blaming the deaths of four Americans (including an ambassador) on a "protest spurred by a video" is hogwash. Based on all we've heard about the situation, it had to have been a premeditated attack. The way they fired those mortars, and knew EXACTLY where to fire them? That sort of attack takes planning. Months of it. And hell, Swillary had the GALL to call the families of the deceased "liars" after they came forward.
I've never even HEARD Edwards' name mentioned before. Doesn't seem to be that big a deal.
Oh, like your side rallies around Bill Clinton, eh? Let's face it, both sides are flawed. But from what I've observed, one side is more flawed than the other. Steeped in hiveminded groupthink, deplorable double standards, and an ever-growing list of cover-ups and shady backroom dealings......
I think you know which side I speak of.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ah, the usual liberal response of name calling and profanity.
Way to prove the stereotype.
You know, from our conversation on Kajm's post I thought you were a pretty cool, reasonable guy. What happened?
And everything above has been documented, your excuses are weak. And false.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
>Points out the logically holes in post
>"A response of name calling and profanity"
Yeah how about you actually address what was said instead of side stepping dude.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"you dumbass"
"fucing Alex Jones article"
"When the fuck"
"are you too lazy"
"flat out bullshit"
"you donkey"
"Who the fuck"
"they are retarded"
I am addressing exactly what was said by you. Fair warning, this is my page,
if you cannot discuss a subject without profanity and name calling,
I will block you. Not because I am afraid of you, or unwilling to host
anyone who disagrees with me, as you may claim.
I enjoy discussing things with people who disagree with me, it's how I
learn new things.
But I won't put up with rudeness. Be civil, or begone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
"I am addressing exactly what was said by you. Fair warning, this is my page, "
Yes, continue ignoring the actual arguments and focus on the most important aspect of this conversation... me swearing. I love how you actually cut off the sentences too. Like you couldn't read any further after I said the word fuck.
"if you cannot discuss a subject without profanity and name calling,
I will block you. Not because I am afraid of you, or unwilling to host
anyone who disagrees with me, as you may claim.
I enjoy discussing things with people who disagree with me, it's how I
learn new things.
But I won't put up with rudeness. Be civil, or begone."
Let's get this out of the way, blocking someone for swearing is MissouriPatriot level shit. No gives a shit that I swear because guess what, people swear all the time. Trump swears a lot as well, will you hold him to the same accountability? No because he's saying something you like. I'm saying something you don't want to hear and so instead of addressing anything I've said to counter your claims you instant focus on my swearing in order to make yourself look like the morally higher person without actually presenting a real argument.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You are gone.
It's my page, and I won't put up with profanity.
Your opinion is not binding on me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
'I enjoy discussing things with people who disagree with me, it's how I
learn new things.'
One thing I have learned from his ilk a long time ago: by using 'autism' as a slur, it is evident to me that slime like him look down upon such people. And we know what happened to those kinds of people in Nazi Germany, the USSR, under The Terror...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Not on my page he won't.
He's blocked.
Some people just can't follow instructions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Did you just compare me to a Nazi because I used autism as an insult? As someone who is autistic I will be as edgy as I want Gary.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I notice you immediately sank to the level of ad hominem attacks and that your prime argument is that nobody defended the actions of these immoral Democrats. You also said that some of the things listed couldn't have happened because the public relations arm of the Democrat party, namely the tv, (except for Fox) radio, (except for talk radio) newspapers, magazines, and motion pictures never mentioned them. The foreign press had no interest in exposing the corruption in the Democrat party and the Democrat dominated governments because they are virtually all Leftist to begin with and the Democrats were pouring American taxpayer money into those countries. Then your last statement that the people outside of the US, who make fun of Republicans, are retarded is just plain mean
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
I noticed he uses 'autism' as a slur- proof that leftist slime like himself consider mental illnesses / differences something to look down upon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yep. Trust me, I've had that slur directed my way a lot, although for different reasons, I know how much it hurts to actually have autism. One of my sisters has it. I myself have Asperger's syndrome, which falls under that same spectrum. It's truly disgusting to see the lows the Regressive Left stoops to on a regular basis. Sickening.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You notice he takes everything you pointed out of his stupidity and then tripled down on it?
This is why I ignore and spam the bastard. There's no intelligence, ethics, morality or decency behind that mind.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It’s funny because most of this stuff can be searched via google or YouTube, hell people outside of info Wars have been talking about this for years, you can even find articles occasionally from mainstream outlets about politicians giving money to terrorist organizations like the FSA, giving Saudi Arabia a free pass, and not to mention the Syrian Rebels Assad has been fighting, and he has the ghoul to act like Hillary and the Democratic establishment didn’t do nothin or pass it off as some Alex Jones conspiracy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"I notice you immediately sank to the level of ad hominem attacks and that your prime argument is that nobody defended the actions of these immoral Democrats. "
Well for some that was the argument, others questioned the legitimacy of some of the claims. For example the Obama ones, which sound like they came right from Alex Jones himself.
"You also said that some of the things listed couldn't have happened because the public relations arm of the Democrat party, namely the tv, (except for Fox) radio, (except for talk radio) newspapers, magazines, and motion pictures never mentioned them. The foreign press had no interest in exposing the corruption in the Democrat party and the Democrat dominated governments because they are virtually all Leftist to begin with and the Democrats were pouring American taxpayer money into those countries."
Mighty big claims require mighty big evidence. So not only are you going with the extreme belief that media outlets won't cover stories like the Obama claims because they are so pro-obama, but now you're adding to that but assuming outlets outside of the US won't cover the stories because the democrats are "pouring american taxpayer money into those countries"? Are you high? Do you not realize how flawed that way of thinking is? You know how much evidence a claim like that would require?
"Then your last statement that the people outside of the US, who make fun of Republicans, are retarded is just plain mean"
Not my fault the republican party is so toxic that they are a punchline in places around the world. Maybe you shouldn't have elected a manchild as president?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
I guess you missed the subtlety of the change in your last statement. My punctuation says that you said the people who make fun are retarded.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
This might be the most pointless comment I have ever gotten as a response. Thank you, for ignoring literally everything to point something that was irrelevant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
