HOME | DD
Catora β Trilithinization
Published: 2006-01-05 00:27:50 +0000 UTC; Views: 2776; Favourites: 43; Downloads: 157
Redirect to original
Description
Yes, me and a good friend of mine wrote out the equation, and finally figuered it out. This circle can, in theroy, change any element into any other element.Related content
Comments: 28
HOLY C*********P!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that's gonna be a mite dangerous.... *mumble mumble* Friend: *bash on head* SNAP OUT OF IT! It's not that dangerous, wimp! Me: *wimper*
π: 0 β©: 0
I did a chart very similar to this attempting to map infinity. It would have worked if it didn't take so much time. But great work on!
Now a couple things in your deffence. The use of pentagonal shapes to repressent infinity works well (now in truth, even numbers save you from stress, but he designs are never as kewl). And with alchemy, all the energy from the conversion of atoms would be used to speed up the transmutation and power the array. Plus transmutation circles are meant to hold up to the power or explosions and powerful reaction forces.
Now this is where I say some constructive critisism. Make sure you follow the laws of conservation with this. You didn't make it clear what would happen to extra particles or what would happen when more particles are needed for a heavyer atom.
For the use of transmuting a large some of atoms into one element, this array would be perfect. For one atom (which I dont know why somebody would), not so much...
All in all, good work. You were very precise with your measurements, so gold star for that. You were also able to figure out what it did, so good work there, too. And if you ever get really bored, try to map infinity with this. It would work (well, kinda). There are plenty of ways to do it and its lots of fun to try. I also hope I didn't sound like a dick in this critique thing, but it is incombent upon we alchemist to seek the truth, and constructive critisism is one way to get closer to the truth. I'm also sorry about the noval of a comment.
π: 0 β©: 1
No I love constructive critisism, it's the dickish internet "Ur a fag who haz no idea what he's talking about and I do" critisism that bugs me...
As for the law of conservation, in this array I contested with the thought of free control of atom pieces, proton, electrons, nutrons, all floating about freely until ordered to arrange in the manner desired. Basically breaking down to the most basic particles and building what you please. So if I start with 200 lbs of Carbon, I can make like 85 lbs of silicon. But yeah, nuetron are the main problem, once you get to the heavier elements the proportions become rediculious, what I need to study is the process to freely change the quarks in each part, maybe find a way to alter a proton into a neutron. As for remaining particles left over...well I never said this array was safe, only that it did what it does, soooo a radiation suit might be recomended. LOL
π: 0 β©: 0
Very nicely done. Now if only Photoshop or Illustrator had a graphing ability to put various equations in... I'd have a much easier time doing some of mine because then I could draw certain things mathematically correct.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you, and yeah using an equation would be fun to make arrays with, but the only way I know to do it is a compass, a procision eye, and Macromedia Fireworks. Yay Fireworks!
π: 0 β©: 0
On your website you described this as breaking down atoms to their sub atomic particle, allowing you to make anything as long as you had enough sub atomic particles (electrons, protons, neutrons) to form all the atoms of the new structure.
Itβs a really cool idea, but one problem, splitting atoms apart at the subatomic level, releases HUGE amounts of energy, i.e a nuclear warhead splitting the atoms of uranium atoms apart.
I think the alchemist in question would be wiped out and so would everybody and everything else in a very large radius before the reaction was complete.
However it would be excellent for a weapon, who needs the complex mechanics and risky mining involved in making atomic bombs, when you can use alchemy to split any atoms you want.
Perhaps make a remote trigger, like a secondary circle which is drawn around whatever will have its atoms split, the circle might need to be a double circle to reinforce the boundaries, so that stuff outside it isnβt split, and that containment circle is linked by a line or something to the control circle which is the one you have here, which can initiates the reaction in the containment circle, far away from the alchemist.
π: 0 β©: 1
Actually that's a very good point, but I did think of that. The concept of this array first came to me when I read of an interesting incident with a nucular experiment. Apearntly, while messing around with some nucular cores the metal they had surounding the experiment with turned to "partialy" solid gold. I new that nucular energy had to be involed some how in the array, but what's great about alchemy is that with a little planning and the right symbols you can control any aspect of a chemical reation. The pentagram is the key, it's a very speacial shape in that it can be draw within itself infinatly, so I chose this shape to manage the energy released. It acts as a net that form fits to it's target, all the alchimst has to do is hold on(supply enough energy). Then the nucular energy is used to power the rest of the effect, until the element you require is achived and all that energy left over is redistributed into the atoms so as to make them stable. It all worked in the equation....if my friend would find the damn thing.
π: 0 β©: 0
Very nice! Where did you learn to write alchemy formulas?
π: 0 β©: 1
self-taught/researched/practiced, you just have to watch the show as closly as I did(pad and pencil taking notes) and figure out the power of the symbols used in the show. However they don't cover every symbol, that's where real alchemy symbology comes in handy.
π: 0 β©: 1
If only I had the patience to do that. Oh well, I'll just keep drawing cool ones that don't mean anything.
π: 0 β©: 1
All arrays mean something, you just have to define their purpose.
π: 0 β©: 0
thanks, it's one of my favorites.
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks I really like your stuff as well.
π: 0 β©: 1
THAAAAAANK youβͺ
π: 0 β©: 1
Amazing precision, I love it. And the symbolism.
π: 0 β©: 1
thanks, I put a weeks worth of thought into it.
π: 0 β©: 0
Neat! I like the complex design of this, really makes me think of transmutation circles like from FMA. 
π: 0 β©: 1
........but that's my job...to make FMA circles...I *shoulder angel appears* Angel: "what the hell are you doing??" Catora: "umm" *angel slaps Catora* angel: 'being stupid is what you're doing, just take the damn compliment!!" Catora: "y..yes mam...thanks for the wonderful compliment!!"
π: 0 β©: 1
Hehehe you're welcome.
π: 0 β©: 0
Hm, through symbolism and correspondence, i'm not sure how the pentacle would fit in there...
But nice anways... Fav!
π: 0 β©: 1
Well okay get this, I found out that the pentacle has the ability to be drawn within itself indefinitely, that makes for some good versatility and flexibility which was really needed in this circle. Plus using a 5 in an equation makes for pretty easy math with no chance for infinite numbers! I could have made it a 10 star instead, but 5 star demands less energy, which is good.
π: 0 β©: 1
Math and symbolism are two different things. Guess you work on the math thing.
π: 0 β©: 1
In alchemy (the fma style anyway) math and the sybols used actually cross several times, mostly it's just the geometry part of drawing the circles.
π: 0 β©: 0