HOME | DD

Cervelet — addictive science Griffins 2

Published: 2010-05-21 18:08:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 4990; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 105
Redirect to original
Description oh the anticipation! What happened?
Related content
Comments: 31

Alianna013 [2010-11-08 22:31:09 +0000 UTC]

hahahahahahahahaha

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nocookie4j00 [2010-05-23 15:48:20 +0000 UTC]

im going to guess fennec-gryphon

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cervelet In reply to nocookie4j00 [2010-05-25 16:19:20 +0000 UTC]

right you were.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lightningfire [2010-05-22 05:31:04 +0000 UTC]

I think I'd agree with Cloakable...fennec-based vulpogryph?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cervelet In reply to Lightningfire [2010-05-22 13:35:16 +0000 UTC]

ja.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Osprey-Hawk [2010-05-21 23:14:43 +0000 UTC]

What's so wrong with having a beak with teeth? I've got them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cervelet In reply to Osprey-Hawk [2010-05-22 08:01:48 +0000 UTC]

well it's something that hasn't existed since archeopterix.

Although not if SCIENCE has a word to say. ([link] )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Osprey-Hawk In reply to Cervelet [2010-05-22 09:06:48 +0000 UTC]

Anthros don't need to be anatomically or evolutionarily correct. The story with my character is that there are some T-rex genes that had been activated so I got teeth. They're more canid than dino, but I like the idea.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cervelet In reply to Osprey-Hawk [2010-05-22 13:35:03 +0000 UTC]

I LIKE anatomical correctness! SCIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEENCE HAHAHA

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ablesuit [2010-05-21 22:49:06 +0000 UTC]

awww there building a rocket that can go boom
he can peek and chew your eyes out at the same time :"3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cervelet In reply to Ablesuit [2010-05-22 15:05:29 +0000 UTC]

dude that's gross.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ablesuit In reply to Cervelet [2010-05-23 08:02:11 +0000 UTC]

or is it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BoredBird [2010-05-21 21:40:19 +0000 UTC]

It turned him into a baby griffon!?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cervelet In reply to BoredBird [2010-05-22 15:05:37 +0000 UTC]

nooo....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

twistedndistorted [2010-05-21 21:37:12 +0000 UTC]

Lol, since when anatomy makes sense?
Lukas looks cute on the second panel, also by being turned into a fennec so many times I think he would be used to be small.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cloakable [2010-05-21 21:36:36 +0000 UTC]

Yesssss

Fennec Gryphon?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ballom [2010-05-21 20:51:36 +0000 UTC]

que je devine....un griffon fennec? XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cervelet In reply to ballom [2010-05-22 14:09:30 +0000 UTC]

possible....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JonBuck [2010-05-21 19:46:53 +0000 UTC]

Based on a songbird, maybe?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cervelet In reply to JonBuck [2010-05-22 15:06:35 +0000 UTC]

it's based a little on a eagle.. only smaller
and with a forehead

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Orbitalblast [2010-05-21 19:27:55 +0000 UTC]

This cliffhanger is KILLING ME!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cervelet In reply to Orbitalblast [2010-05-22 15:06:47 +0000 UTC]

BUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Crazedyote [2010-05-21 18:55:47 +0000 UTC]

Lol for Lukas, off small and off panel is normal.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Fluffy-1 [2010-05-21 18:19:18 +0000 UTC]

The off panel person became smaller to make up for the wings?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GJTProductions In reply to The-Fluffy-1 [2010-05-21 21:19:14 +0000 UTC]

No, because we can't see the wings, they shrunk too. Wouldn't work. Unless our dear author is more clever with "camera angles" than I'm giving him credit for... >.>

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Fluffy-1 In reply to GJTProductions [2010-05-21 22:35:31 +0000 UTC]

Oh, heheh, you gotta a point'dere

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GJTProductions [2010-05-21 18:16:25 +0000 UTC]

Hrm, I'm not sure "small" was part of Celia's plan. And where'd the mass go? No one else we've seen has gotten bigger...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

twistedndistorted In reply to GJTProductions [2010-05-21 21:33:35 +0000 UTC]

Maybe it went to the neighbour like the first comics

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Homeward In reply to GJTProductions [2010-05-21 21:10:54 +0000 UTC]

maybe it went into that missile?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GJTProductions In reply to Homeward [2010-05-21 21:18:08 +0000 UTC]

Nah, I think it would have been more obvious if it was the missile (for example, a surprised expression from Mark, I think that's the guys name...).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nitrinoxus In reply to GJTProductions [2010-05-21 21:32:59 +0000 UTC]

It is. And in the defense of the mass-to-missile idea, it could still be in the process of transferring. We've never seen lost mass transfer to an inanimate object in this series before, and it might take longer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0