HOME | DD
Published: 2009-10-02 22:58:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 1091; Favourites: 7; Downloads: 14
Redirect to original
Description
Dear PostSecret,I am an accidental fraud. I suppose ‘accidental’ is a relative term there… Obviously I meant to take the actions I took that led to my becoming a fraud, but still. Fraudulence wasn’t my intended goal, is what I’m trying to say.
In fact, many of my actual goals have been realised—more than realised—and would be seen, by the vast majority, as perfectly respectable, admirable goals: I am a rich, successful, well-respected chef with my own restaurant perched delicately on a remote cliff overlooking the sea, the ideal place for pretentious young go-getters who want to eat something modern and fancy that only tastes good to the refined palette. There is but one fly in the ointment (or, indeed, soup), but it is arguably quite a big fly with a rather nasty-looking sting on it. Of course we use all the finest ingredients, organic and free-range and whatever else the concerned well-to-do want, but occasionally what we serve doesn’t correlate entirely with what was on the menu. For instance, were you to order anything containing beef, you would receive plump, fresh, locally-sourced badger. The local source being the nearest motorway.
Now that may seem wicked and foul and so on, but we’ve simply found it to taste better. Something to do with a certain tang of tarmac and rubber and petrol fumes, or perhaps a tenderness that only an articulated lorry can bestow, we’re not sure. But we’ve tried putting the proper meat back and people just don’t like it as much. And of course we can’t go advertising our food as roadkill—even young go-getters have their limits.
It began when the business had only just got going, and we had a restaurant critic coming in for an early lunch from a far more prominent newspaper than we could ever have hoped for. Of course I was terribly, terribly nervous when I came into the kitchen that morning, as I bustled about, checking everything was ready, and my mood was hardly improved by the fact that the fridge was both smoking and dripping. We salvaged what we could, but the meat, the cheese, the fish, the milk—all ruined. I was informed that the critic had arrived before we’d even got cleaned up. And of course he ordered a meat dish. Fate has a funny sense of humour like that.
We were too far from anywhere to order any meat in and have it cooked in reasonable time, and I panicked. Well, you can guess what happened. And the poor man positively raved about the quality of what was in fact two hedgehogs. That was that, we were a hit. The hedgehogs certainly were.
It’s not the fact that people would be disgusted if they knew what they were eating that bothers me, though. I mean, the food is all carefully chosen to make sure it’s safe, and they like the taste of it. They’d only find it repulsive because they’ve been brought up to think that squirrel isn’t good eating. What worries me is that my reputation might be unearned—that if all chefs were using the same ingredients as me, I wouldn’t be anything special. That I am a fraud with no talent other than the chutzpah to serve people roasted vermin for the prices I do.
There is a skill in that, though, in having the confidence to convince people that something is worth eating—in presenting it in such a way that it becomes appetising, in polishing the diamond in the rough, in improving the cover of the book so that people are not put off reading it and appreciating the deliciousness of the words. There is a skill in turning badger into beef. Perhaps I am a fraud, but perhaps all chefs are.
It’s too late to do things any differently now, and I don’t think I’d want to: I’m helping people enjoy something they can’t enjoy anywhere else.
Plus our profit margins have soared.
Related content
Comments: 22
meish [2010-01-19 17:09:05 +0000 UTC]
I'm sure you could have worked in a pun at 'That was that, we were a hit.' The hedgehogs certainly were.
And why on Earth would you write something serious when you can write this?
Mmm... squirrel.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chugglepuff In reply to meish [2010-01-20 22:38:26 +0000 UTC]
Oh God, why didn't I think of that?? Do you mind if I add it?
And you make a fair point - poignancy is a poor second to peculiarity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
meish In reply to chugglepuff [2010-01-22 17:03:34 +0000 UTC]
Of course I don't mind!
'Poignancy is a poor second to peculiarity' - I like that. I'd probably take to saying it if it wasn't slightly tongue-twister-ish.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Leanndra51 [2009-11-22 22:37:28 +0000 UTC]
Oh my, how absolutely clever and funny! I smiled, smirked, and laughed my way through this "confession".
You have a very tongue-in-cheek approach in this.
Oh and how can you think this is unoriginal? I am almost 60 years old, am a voracious reader and have never read anything quite like this. "Fried Green Tomatoes" is the only other writing that comes to mind after having read this. Of course that story was darker, but quite humorous as well.
I think this is superbly written! Congratulations on taking 2nd place in the contest! Oh, and I may never eat meat in a restaurant again!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chugglepuff In reply to Leanndra51 [2010-06-07 09:24:17 +0000 UTC]
Hi! I'm sorry it has taken me so implausibly long to reply to your comment and you've probably forgotten you ever made it in the first place, but I just wanted to thank you ever so much for your kind words - you made me feel a lot more positive about this piece. Thank you!
Also, you're never going to eat meat in a restaurant again? But badger burgers sound delicious!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
msklystron [2009-11-01 04:13:07 +0000 UTC]
Congratulations on winning 2nd place for your confession! It was brilliant and funny, but you also succeeded in developing a character who fibs to himself, but can also be self-critical and who learns to accept/rationalize the less appetizing bits of his art...
I loved the commentary on chefs being frauds. So true. It's all in the presentation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chugglepuff In reply to msklystron [2009-11-03 22:55:23 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much! For judging and donating prizes and the terribly kind comment and the fav! I'm really glad you liked this, I really enjoyed writing it.
I'll definitely be doing more fiction when I get some spare time... Thanks again!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
msklystron In reply to chugglepuff [2009-11-04 01:15:47 +0000 UTC]
My pleasure!
The joy in the writing shines through.
Perhaps, a roadkill recipe book?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SedahLiah [2009-10-09 22:07:20 +0000 UTC]
This is a great example of why you're so lovable.
Not unoriginal at all, my dear, you always find ways to insert your own uniqueness into everything you write, and 'tis always of the finest quality I assure you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chugglepuff In reply to SedahLiah [2009-10-16 21:45:15 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I'm really glad you didn't find it too unoriginal, I always struggle with story ideas... Thanks again, you've made me feel less doubtful about this piece now!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SedahLiah In reply to chugglepuff [2009-10-20 23:52:43 +0000 UTC]
I'm glad. I might give some thought to writing humorous anecdotes, as well, perhaps an essay or two. Your work has sufficiently inspired me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
smallcraig1606 [2009-10-03 11:13:39 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps I am a fraud, but perhaps all chefs are.Not a sentiment guaranteed to endear you to the world's chefs, but a delightfully cheeky insight nonetheless.
This may be silly (which I personally love!), but I would not call it unoriginal (there you go, being self-deprecating again hehe) - it is a lovely piece of work. I hope you will find this the compliment it is meant to be, but it reminds me a little of Jeffrey Archer's short story style.
I think this is very good (for what that is worth, of course). it's an enjoyable read, and that's scores very high for me ...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
chugglepuff In reply to smallcraig1606 [2009-10-16 21:52:03 +0000 UTC]
Oopsy-daisy - thank you for the fav as well! And while I'm at it, thanks for the fav on the play that remains annoyingly untitled - much appreciated!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
smallcraig1606 In reply to chugglepuff [2009-11-03 11:04:20 +0000 UTC]
Dear, dear Bryony - I am sooo sorry for taking so long to reply to you. It is my pleasure to fav your work - I like it so much! I want to go back to the play and give it further attention, but I am sadly time-poor - poor pitiful me (how melodramatic haha). And I feel all warm and fuzzy after that lovely
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chugglepuff In reply to smallcraig1606 [2009-11-03 23:06:03 +0000 UTC]
Now, really! There's no need to apologise, it really doesn't bother me at all - I'm far more behind than you are! It's always nice to hear from you when you've got time to spare, however long ago the original conversation may have been. As long as you don't expect an immediate reply...
It is such a pain, all this not having time - there are loads of things in my inbox that promise to be good that I haven't even read once yet... Ah well. Probably better to be busy than bored. *the last sentence said with significant reluctance* I hope you're keeping well!
Oh, and thanks for the Roald Dahl recommendation in the parallel conversation (I have decided to combine these threads to improve the efficiency of this dialogue ) - I haven't read said tales yet! Though I imagine it will be a while before I get through all the books that are already on my to-read list...
Well, I'm bound to get through them eventually.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
smallcraig1606 In reply to chugglepuff [2009-11-07 12:51:55 +0000 UTC]
As much as I intellectually know that you (a) are very generous; and (b) find yourself in the same position, I still find myself unable to not apologise ... But it is also a grat pleasure to hear from you, regardless, as you say, of the interval between exchanges.
I agree whole-heartedly - lack of time is a real pain. I have many images in my inbox that I've had no chance to look at, and it's quite demoralising. And I appreciate your reluctance to say "better to be busy that bored".
I am keeping quite well. I was retrenched from my job of 14 years 2 weeks ago (don't cry for me - it was quite a relief in many ways, as work was beginning to really bring me down). I've been doing some training (funded by former employer) to help me get back into the swing of applying for jobs, etc, so I don't think it will be too long before I'm back into the daily grind (some time off first, though, will be welcome). I got a decent payout for my years of loyal service (pfft!), so financially things are not too shabby.
I hope you do get time to partake of some Dahl amongst your other reading - I think you will find it most agreeable.
Anyway, hooroo for now, and I look forward to another instalment should that be appropriate!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chugglepuff In reply to smallcraig1606 [2009-10-16 21:49:48 +0000 UTC]
No, I suppose not. Hopefully no easily-angered chef will come across this...
Well thank you! I admit, I'm also quite in favour of silly things, it's just somewhat frustrating when I'm attempting to actually write something not silly... I'm really glad you enjoyed it! I haven't read anything of Jeffrey Archer's (though I do have a vague suspicion of him for other reasons...), but perhaps I shall investigate his tales, to see if they are appropriately silly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
smallcraig1606 In reply to chugglepuff [2009-11-03 11:08:44 +0000 UTC]
I thought I had replued to this reply, but it appears that I am mistaken ...
I understand your suspicion of the peer ... I wasn't thinking so much of the silliness aspect, as the "twist in the tale" aspect that reminded me of his work in yours ... Nonetheless, I believe you would find them most entertaining. Of course, if one is after silly with a twist, one cannot go past Roald Dahl's "Tales of the Unexpected" ...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chugglepuff In reply to Maskmaker24 [2009-10-16 21:52:41 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!!! You are far too kind, but I shan't complain. And thanks very much for the fav, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0






