HOME | DD
cisiopurple β Alamosaurus
Published: 2017-01-07 10:31:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 25814; Favourites: 212; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Reference: Scott Hartman 2013Related content
Comments: 68
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 2 β©: 2
π: 2 β©: 2
π: 2 β©: 1
π: 2 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 2
π: 1 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
(nerf = when something is made worse in video games)
seems smaller than the older version, hence nerfed.
π: 0 β©: 1
Β I am too old for this word, my son knows.
I used exactly the size bar of Hartman, but I don't remember if its skeletal is referred to a juvenile....
π: 0 β©: 1
I heard thereβs fossil evidence that it grew as big as an argentinosaurus. Do you think thatβs true?
π: 0 β©: 2
The giant tibia individual was most likely not in the same tier as Argentinosaurus, but it may have been similar in size to Patagotitan and maybe Puertasaurus.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 1
What's with the spikes on its body and tail? Looks pretty unique
Also, it's my favorite North American sauropod!!
π: 0 β©: 1
I think that the spikes are a primitive feature, typical of the Jurassic sauropods, but not of the titanosaurs.
Β
π: 0 β©: 1
That is apparently the largest specimen... Massive!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Β probably the human size could be smallerΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh, I thought you had a standard human size, probably around the average 175cm... but okay, still huge anyway
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>