HOME | DD

Published: 2019-09-16 15:49:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 18128; Favourites: 208; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 46
ZLClosas [2025-03-26 03:55:36 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
1200924 [2024-04-17 22:13:21 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
cisiopurple In reply to 1200924 [2024-04-20 17:02:28 +0000 UTC]
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
gokuijohn144f [2021-06-20 17:43:21 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cisiopurple In reply to gokuijohn144f [2021-06-25 14:55:57 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MikeTribbianni [2020-10-24 21:08:34 +0000 UTC]
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
Mirraxsis [2019-09-20 00:31:24 +0000 UTC]
Wow! The detail is amazing. I love the coloring too really does stand out. Awesome job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Prehistoricmaster12 In reply to Atlantis536 [2020-05-06 01:56:26 +0000 UTC]
This is A. lithographica right?
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Hotshotraptor [2019-09-17 10:52:10 +0000 UTC]
A surprise but a welcomed one!
Amazing work yet again
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PedroD148 [2019-09-17 00:46:49 +0000 UTC]
quedo hermoso.. buena coloracion y las sombras lo hacen mas real.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PWJ500 [2019-09-16 23:38:11 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PWJ500 In reply to cisiopurple [2019-09-18 01:02:57 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PWJ500 In reply to cisiopurple [2019-09-21 20:40:20 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PWJ500 In reply to cisiopurple [2019-09-23 13:46:39 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cisiopurple In reply to thedinorocker [2019-09-17 06:33:05 +0000 UTC]
sulle penne delle ali mi darei le bacchettate sulle mani....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cisiopurple In reply to Dinobot360 [2019-09-17 06:35:07 +0000 UTC]
bird or dinosaur? this is the problem....
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Dinobot360 In reply to cisiopurple [2019-09-17 22:55:50 +0000 UTC]
I was completing your picture
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IndominusPrime99 [2019-09-16 16:37:00 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cisiopurple In reply to IndominusPrime99 [2019-09-17 06:36:18 +0000 UTC]
it is probably a sister taxon of anchiornis, so I had to do it....
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
YellowPanda2001 [2019-09-16 15:58:52 +0000 UTC]
I thought you didn't draw avialans. Are archaeopterygids position in Avialae debatable?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
cisiopurple In reply to YellowPanda2001 [2019-09-17 06:38:30 +0000 UTC]
AndreOF explained better. It probably was not yet an Avialae
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AndreOF-Gallery In reply to YellowPanda2001 [2019-09-16 18:42:48 +0000 UTC]
Kinda off; it seems that Archaeopterygidae = Anchiornithidae and they can be troodontids, Basal deinonychosaurians or part of Avialae.
I suggested he did the archaeopterygids because of this reason, and since he was already doing some of them (anchiornithids).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YellowPanda2001 In reply to AndreOF-Gallery [2019-09-16 19:11:07 +0000 UTC]
Anchiornithids were once believed to be troodontids, they are now considered to be avialans. Would suggest for cisiopurple to do everything that isn't in euavialae, that includes Alcmonavis, Wellnhoferia, Jeholornis (?), Rahonavis and maybe Yandangornis.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AndreOF-Gallery In reply to YellowPanda2001 [2019-09-16 20:14:40 +0000 UTC]
I suggested Alcmonavis and Wellnhoferia cause they are in the jurassic mess, and Rahonavis cas it has recently had more support as an Unenlagiid than a Avian.
The other taxa are from the second walf of the early Cretaceous, and they are stable avians so I don't see a reason for it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YellowPanda2001 In reply to AndreOF-Gallery [2019-09-16 20:40:59 +0000 UTC]
Rahonavis is a definite paravian. I don't see it as a dromaeosaur, but if it is not an avialan that seems also plausible
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AndreOF-Gallery In reply to YellowPanda2001 [2019-09-16 21:10:33 +0000 UTC]
There are comments about it on the Hesperornithoids paper, it explains why the support for an avian has fallen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YellowPanda2001 In reply to AndreOF-Gallery [2019-09-17 07:19:10 +0000 UTC]
The Hesperornithoides paper is very flawed in my opinion, but I don't have much knowledge to give veracity to my doubts, though...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IanLuksz [2019-09-16 15:50:24 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1