HOME | DD
Conservatoons — That Outta Do It
Published: 2007-10-06 15:39:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 2221; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 12
Redirect to original
Description
What is likely to be the next terrorist target(s)?Well, schools, colleges and hospitals are liberal bastions and virtually gun free. Thank god there is a strong push to protect those places -- uh, that's right. There isn't.
Related content
Comments: 94
Or maybe water-pistols? So they would know that they made a really, really bad thing?
Police officer: "Take that you... evil, evil bandit, you!"
...
Sorry, couldn't resist it mate....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nothing like feeling like a flock of sheep ripe for the slaughter huh?
I haven't heard anyone discuss gun rights in the presidential race yet. Who supports gun ownership and who wants us to be defenseless victims? That's one of the things I want to know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
No front runners support owning firearms. They're all for banning.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nobody should worry though, since our police force and court system are so good at protecting us. You know, from white collar criminals. You can't expect them to deal with the dangerous ones.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
After all, they might get hurt and then they can't protect us!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Exactly!
Thank goodness for Jack Thompson, ace attorney (read: jacka$$), keeping videogames from making more criminals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank God for Sarah Brady too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Just found this about her apparently hypocritical stance: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Have you ever noticed that all the politicians and celebs who call for gun bans make damn well sure that they have a very large, heavily armed security force?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sadly there is not front runner who supports the 2nd. Rudy and Mit are abysmal. I don't even need to mention the libs on the other side of the aisle.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Giuliani, as governor of New York, saw what gun abuse does to a city. His policies might have been a bit restrictive (anathema to you, I know), but thing is, they worked. NYC went from being a hole in the ground to a national treasure. Results before rhetoric, my friend.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It was because of increased law enforcement and penalties - not gun control. Facts befor rhetoric, friend.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
If I have to explain it you are almost too far gone to reach. "increased law enforcement and penalties" means: cops actually arresting people and putting them in jail - even charging, citing and fining. "shall not be infringed" is the last part of the 2nd. How does gun control fit in with that?
Gun control is libspeak for gun abolition. See Britain, Australia, most of Europe. Do you really want the "Man" to be the only one armed?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The only reason I haven't responded to this already was because you didn't link it to my post with the reply button. If that was purposeful, shame on you.
Yeah, countries with strict gun policies are all Orwellian police states. Good one...
Geez, you and the 2nd Amendment. Yes, the Bill of Rights is a groundbreaking and crucial document. It was also written MORE THAN 200 YEARS AGO. If a business tried to operate based on 1791's business rules, it would die. Why must our government cling to tradition in the face of insurmountable evidence against it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arm yourself w/ facts. John Lott - More Guns, Less Crime.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
My apologies-you typed Locke when you first brought this up, and I thought that's who it was. It was a stupid argument on my part to begin with.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I will arm myself with facts: Deaths by personal firearm are occurring more frequently than ever before. Something I'm sure John LOCKE would recognize.
You tried this one on me before, in case you forgot. It didn't work then, and it won't work now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OK, am I missing something here? What exactly is the difference between "increased law enforcement and penalties" and gun control? By definition, gun control is not gun abolition. Also, your "new" opinion contrasts with the "right to guns all the time" shtick you had a month ago.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I like how the Democratic party is mad because there are Democrats that support the 2nd amendment. I'm surprised that they haven't kicked those particular people out.
But the Republicans do have Giuliani...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
They were pretty harsh w/ Lieberman. They know the few 2nd amdmt dems have to support it because of the rural contituency. I'm sure on a personal level they want the people to be disarmed sheep.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I find it interesting that Giuliani went from being pro-gun control to being an advocate for gun rights. It seemed to occur at the same time he decided to run for President. Hmm...
What are Obama's and Clinton's stances? I ask like I don't already know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Their stances are "BAN THEM ALL NOW!"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
A denfenseless person is a person who is unable to fight whether by a certain situation or by choice. You can still stop a burgler by shoving your foot up his balls. This would be a good example: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
That was pretty funny. I had to bookmark that site.
But anyway, it's not the point that you can still defend yourself without a gun. That's obvious. The point is that self-defense is viewed more and more as a negative thing.
Just look at the way police are handled. There are groups that want our police force completely unarmed. No guns, no tasers, no clubs, not even pepper spray.
If that's what they want the state of the police to be, what do you think they want for average citizens?
For now, we're plenty safe though. I don't predict the repealing of the 2nd amendment anytime soon.
But, I suppose you can still be charged with a crime for shooting someone that breaks into your house or business.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kinda hard to kick someone in the balls, when your already looking down the barrel of a magnum. im not starting anything, im just saying...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Unless you're really fast.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You mean terrorists and crooks don't obey signs!?
*gasp!*
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
What if the terrorist made up an excuse by saying they don't know how to read the sign? I've heard that some Vietnamese guys used that excuse so they can fish in restricted areas and, ironically enough, the reason for being restricted is because the water was tainted (Irongate and Copco).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh noes! That means... WE MUST BUILD FENCES THAT HAVE SIGNS! That would get their attention.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"If you kill all the wolves, you're gonna have a crapload of bunnies...and by bunnies, I mean stupid people."
-The Ninja (www.askaninja.com)
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
so, your saying that we should let kids go to school and shoot each other?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maybe you should ask a grown-up to explain this to you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that doesnt answer my question
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Don't let the KIDS bring gun to school, allow LICENSED FACULTY to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yeah, but wouldn't that be kind of drastic? i do believe in the constitutional right, but it does need to be controlled.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, you know what they say about drastic times. I'm not quite so sure on the demographics so I'm not so sure. But having a police drug sniffer dog (and his armed handler) at a school would've stopped those two shootings we had awhile ago. You know what the prescribed method for evading a shooter in school is now? Lock the doors, hudel in a corner away from the door, and keep quite. Not very effective I say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yeah i agree. you think the gunmen would be GOING TO THE SCHOOL, and would know protocol? the education system is really going downhill these days.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
true. not a lot of diff between stupid people and bunnies either.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yeah, no kidding.... Well, I have heard of some cases from the news that there are allowing teachers in certain states that have CCWs to bring their handguns to school whenever the "worst case situation" were to ever happen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah. And I'm sure some teachers are packing and not telling anybody.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I say kudos to them and I don't blame them. I just pray they never get caught.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0