HOME | DD

Cozycosmicat β€” Koffing

Published: 2010-11-02 18:38:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 1078; Favourites: 72; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description Koffing for my comic's Pokedex project.

Also read Pokemon Zirconia here:
Pokemon Zirconia
Related content
Comments: 15

Big-Bad-Wulf [2010-11-02 20:04:38 +0000 UTC]

ADORABLE!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Cozycosmicat In reply to Big-Bad-Wulf [2010-11-02 20:22:12 +0000 UTC]

;3 thanks~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

blu-hell-smith [2010-11-02 19:47:08 +0000 UTC]

Koffing is so cute! also, if he is bouyed by lighter than air gases, then would hitting the deck help at all when he expels poisonous gases since they are slightly lighter than air and will rise?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Cozycosmicat In reply to blu-hell-smith [2010-11-02 20:22:57 +0000 UTC]

His level of floatation probably depends on how much gasses that are stored. Less gas, less floatation.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

blu-hell-smith In reply to Cozycosmicat [2010-11-02 22:20:01 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, I was actually thinking about what happens with the gases after they are released. Kind of like how when the house is on fire they tell you to get low because all the CO2 is going up so the only place where good breathable air is down low. Since the toxic gases are part of the lighter than air mixture that keeps Koffing airborne, when he releases these gases, wouldn't they float upwards after release, leaving a small space of breathable air at the bottom.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Cozycosmicat In reply to blu-hell-smith [2010-11-03 16:00:32 +0000 UTC]

Hm, I would think so. But in most cases of Koffing, they can shoot their gasses directly at their target. I'm thinking the 'gas' based attacks would hit full on and maybe linger for a moment than float upward. While other gasses (that somehow keep Koffing in ballance I'm guessing, like smokescreen) Will linger around on the field longer and take more time to disperse.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

blu-hell-smith In reply to Cozycosmicat [2010-11-03 16:09:29 +0000 UTC]

That sounds sensical, though pokemon rarely makes sense once you try and figure out how real science applies.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Cozycosmicat In reply to blu-hell-smith [2010-11-03 17:04:15 +0000 UTC]

True. They rarely do. But I think it's interesting to provide some sort of explanation to their reasoning.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

blu-hell-smith In reply to Cozycosmicat [2010-11-03 18:32:45 +0000 UTC]

Yes, explain a bit and BS the rest! No body will know the difference! (and some of the BS almost makes sense!)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Cozycosmicat In reply to blu-hell-smith [2010-11-03 18:35:19 +0000 UTC]

It would be cool to see an entire in depth explanation of each and every Pokemon and how they function in the world.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

blu-hell-smith In reply to Cozycosmicat [2010-11-03 18:46:27 +0000 UTC]

well, some of them, like tyranitar, need to be made more realistic in how world changing they are first. I mean seriosuly, tyranitar isn't even a legendary but it has power to alter entire landscapes if it has a bad day.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Cozycosmicat In reply to blu-hell-smith [2010-11-04 15:54:49 +0000 UTC]

Plus its ability to summon up sandstorms instantly. PokΓ©mon are creatures of the elements and I know that they can be destructive. Even if most are peaceful there is always a handful that will terrorize the lands.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

blu-hell-smith In reply to Cozycosmicat [2010-11-04 16:04:48 +0000 UTC]

I just think some of the entries may be a bit exagerrated. If every larvitar ate a mountain we would wear through the earths crust pretty quick, never mind how that breaks the laws of conservation of mass and energy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Cozycosmicat In reply to blu-hell-smith [2010-11-04 16:59:42 +0000 UTC]

I think most Pokedex entries are based on loose fact or on observations of the majority. But in the case of Larvitar, I think that you'd be right on the facts being grossly embellished on. Though, I'm thinking because of the rarity of Lavitar as a species that this PokΓ©mon’s details would be questionable as I would suspect the details of legendaries would be. After all, there seems to be multiple of some species (Lugia) so their breeding habits are all but known.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

blu-hell-smith In reply to Cozycosmicat [2010-11-04 17:32:49 +0000 UTC]

true. very true.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0