HOME | DD

CuckootheBirb — Scp-957

#scp957 #scpfoundation #scp_foundation #scpcontainmentbreach
Published: 2018-06-18 04:41:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 2814; Favourites: 13; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description I have immersed myself into the SCP fandom, and I can't get up
brought to you by LifeAlert

Update: this boi rigged
Related content
Comments: 22

Muffinberries [2018-06-19 06:13:35 +0000 UTC]

Good, good. You have successfully integrated into the fandom.
Also, it should be a little thinner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CuckootheBirb In reply to Muffinberries [2018-06-19 15:03:51 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

and I already had made him thinner because someone already told me that lol

if you've seen the base picture, it's not all skin and bones

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Muffinberries In reply to CuckootheBirb [2018-06-19 15:15:53 +0000 UTC]

True.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HorrorOwl [2018-06-19 01:56:43 +0000 UTC]

If you ever do SCP 682 I'd go off the builder bears drawing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CuckootheBirb In reply to HorrorOwl [2018-06-19 02:05:10 +0000 UTC]

you know what's funny

i drew BOTH of them today

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Randomalistic [2018-06-18 19:47:34 +0000 UTC]

Looks awesome! This image is so infamous- It's cool to see it adapted into a 3D model! I'd say the face could be a bit more bony, but I've never tried sculpting a model before. So I dunno how difficult it is. Anyways, great work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CuckootheBirb In reply to Randomalistic [2018-06-19 01:29:51 +0000 UTC]

what's funny is that that image is just from a halloween prop you could buy for cheap

It's name is "Spazm" and it went for about $100 when it was on sale
I even remember as a kid seeing it at a halloween party


so HA! DEBUNKED

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheKindArtist In reply to CuckootheBirb [2018-10-03 16:36:20 +0000 UTC]

yep! bingo!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SarahDeFroggo225 [2018-06-18 16:50:08 +0000 UTC]

The SCP fandom is absolute trash.

Yet another thing ruined by Tumblr and Reddit fags, who can slither their way into anything and poison it from the inside out.

It's a damn shame too, because SCP was actually a great concept, but a bunch plebeians stormed it and turned the thing into an absolute shitshow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

TheKindArtist In reply to SarahDeFroggo225 [2018-10-03 16:40:43 +0000 UTC]

This is why i'm mostly on the actual wiki site. Since the fandom is for 90% busy only with whatever was put into the fangame(s) and somehow there still are many of them creating their own SCP OCs without knowing about that quite easily the number they use has been reserved or already used. PLUS that their "SCP OCs" almost always consist on the following things:
- Their SCP is in some way a self-insert and mary-sue
- Their SCP is to the very least always slightly humanoid
- Their SCP somehow has a connection with populair SCPs (SCP-049, SCP-173, etc.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CuckootheBirb In reply to SarahDeFroggo225 [2018-06-18 17:04:09 +0000 UTC]

Sometimes it's important to see the good in something
that's how i got in at least

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SarahDeFroggo225 In reply to CuckootheBirb [2018-06-18 17:18:17 +0000 UTC]

Yeah... Not really. That entire place is a fucking degenerate hell-hole devoid of the creativity and immersion that once made it so great. Now it's just filled with SJWs and furfaggots writing articles of their shitty self insert OCs and sperging out over the most pathetic things like the most minor of criticism and jokes.

You might as well tear it all down and start from scratch at this point.

Whatever the hell it is now, it's just a huge insult to people who originally founded SCP. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SCP-096-2 [2018-06-18 15:40:08 +0000 UTC]

you should try your version of SCP-096

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CuckootheBirb In reply to SCP-096-2 [2018-06-18 16:26:03 +0000 UTC]

Im planning 682 and possibly 3199

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SCP-096-2 In reply to CuckootheBirb [2018-06-18 16:26:33 +0000 UTC]

After them, would you do 096?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CuckootheBirb In reply to SCP-096-2 [2018-06-18 16:34:56 +0000 UTC]

most likely not

a lot of people have already remodeled high poly versions

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SCP-096-2 In reply to CuckootheBirb [2018-06-18 16:35:49 +0000 UTC]

As in your concept of 096, like a different model from the ones you see.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CuckootheBirb In reply to SCP-096-2 [2018-06-18 16:38:43 +0000 UTC]

not really interested in modeling him

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SCP-096-2 In reply to CuckootheBirb [2018-06-18 16:39:16 +0000 UTC]

You could try, he's not THAT hideous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CuckootheBirb In reply to SCP-096-2 [2018-06-18 17:05:48 +0000 UTC]

nah, he's just a bit plain for me
that and he's overexposed as hell

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SCP-096-2 In reply to CuckootheBirb [2018-06-18 17:07:02 +0000 UTC]

Could be a good testing model.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MunchJrGames [2018-06-18 07:02:38 +0000 UTC]

brah dat looks like a fuccin' ghoulie

👍: 0 ⏩: 0