HOME | DD

dadouX β€” Garfield and Tedk by-nc-nd

Published: 2010-09-26 20:42:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 22600; Favourites: 424; Downloads: 72
Redirect to original
Description Hi !
Related content
Comments: 108

fred7601 [2012-04-22 13:43:18 +0000 UTC]

This is awesome! I love Garfield! Did you do the graffitti part? Or did someone else do it? Either way, this is pure talent!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to fred7601 [2012-05-01 21:20:10 +0000 UTC]

ahah thanks, yes i do all the graffity

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheChrisMaystor [2010-11-11 09:24:49 +0000 UTC]

dope

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to TheChrisMaystor [2010-11-11 09:28:07 +0000 UTC]

thx

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DOP3-STYL3Z [2010-10-15 10:59:47 +0000 UTC]

haha gotta love garfield man!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DeQQ [2010-10-03 06:52:51 +0000 UTC]

kawaii : d

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to DeQQ [2010-10-04 11:52:09 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mistshine13 [2010-10-03 04:17:34 +0000 UTC]

GARFIIIIEEEELD!
Did you know he was my first ever book that I read?
I've read all the comics- yup, every one!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to Mistshine13 [2010-10-04 11:52:20 +0000 UTC]

Haha nice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mistshine13 In reply to dadouX [2010-10-08 08:05:18 +0000 UTC]

^^ lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SamusFanboy744 [2010-10-03 04:08:48 +0000 UTC]

It's great looking, and it's positive, i wish more Graffiti was like this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to SamusFanboy744 [2010-10-04 11:52:42 +0000 UTC]

thanks ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SamusFanboy744 In reply to dadouX [2010-10-04 13:10:51 +0000 UTC]

No problem at all.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

johnathan-katz [2010-10-03 03:43:33 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah, garfield has finally embraced the gangsta life style x3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to johnathan-katz [2010-10-04 11:53:02 +0000 UTC]

ahah i like to make fun with graffity

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheAcefulDodger30 [2010-10-03 03:43:19 +0000 UTC]

How would you like to join my first ever Halloween Art Jam Contest :[link] /:[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to TheAcefulDodger30 [2010-10-04 11:53:14 +0000 UTC]

ohoh i'll see mate

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KiteSakumoto [2010-10-03 03:06:19 +0000 UTC]

Like it. In case the critics haven't noticed. It looks better than the cities crappy cover up of the old graffiti. I'd hate to see them cover this up since the wall looks worse by them trying to fix it. It would really pop if the white behind was solid. I think the public would like it. I mean Garfield is an American icon.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to KiteSakumoto [2010-10-04 11:53:46 +0000 UTC]

hey thanks mate

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KiteSakumoto In reply to dadouX [2010-10-04 16:24:48 +0000 UTC]

no prob dude.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Zumosmorph [2010-10-03 03:02:47 +0000 UTC]

Garfield is gangsta!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to Zumosmorph [2010-10-04 11:53:32 +0000 UTC]

for sure !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

leotyfmonteiro [2010-10-03 02:12:56 +0000 UTC]

Really nice congratz!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to leotyfmonteiro [2010-10-04 11:53:52 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TrickTownsend [2010-10-03 01:25:26 +0000 UTC]

Garfield+Graffiti=Win!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dadouX In reply to TrickTownsend [2010-10-04 11:53:26 +0000 UTC]

oh yeah !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GoodOleCola [2010-10-03 00:28:49 +0000 UTC]

Yo that is one phat cat. *cha ching!*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

IAmTheUnison [2010-10-03 00:14:19 +0000 UTC]

Garfield for all the world to see.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vicky23135 [2010-10-02 22:26:18 +0000 UTC]

Garfield never looked so cool XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MadnessMayhem133 [2010-10-02 22:09:39 +0000 UTC]

i like it. very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

guard1ans [2010-10-02 22:01:01 +0000 UTC]

epic dude epic

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverZeo [2010-10-02 21:57:55 +0000 UTC]

Nice.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ighgkh [2010-10-02 21:21:47 +0000 UTC]

This is amazing! I think I lol'd when I saw the can... is that beer?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Leashe [2010-10-02 21:09:03 +0000 UTC]

Haters gonna hate, I've always though graffiti was impressive.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AmberShroom [2010-10-02 21:05:34 +0000 UTC]

Right people. There’s more than one type of art in the world.
this happens to be something different to what you may consider decent,
but you try pick up a can it's not as easy as you may think.

so yeah, life goes on

good work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tenshi1 [2010-10-02 20:58:21 +0000 UTC]

All I have to ask is really? This thing is worthy of a DD without the person who suggested it giving us a reason why they even bothered nominating it? That's sad and pathetic. It's particularly sad and pathetic given that there is an almost seamless repetition of "TedK" in the artist's gallery and not much else. Talk about a one trick pony.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

fellenwort In reply to Tenshi1 [2010-10-03 01:46:44 +0000 UTC]

I usually don't give a reason when I suggest a DD.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ricardo-Rick In reply to Tenshi1 [2010-10-02 21:58:07 +0000 UTC]

FAQ #873: What do I do when I disapprove of a Daily Deviation feature?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Post6667 [2010-10-02 19:11:10 +0000 UTC]

sweet

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

UseR-MaRon-GoAnY [2010-10-02 18:30:29 +0000 UTC]

Seen better stuff.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prosaix In reply to UseR-MaRon-GoAnY [2010-10-02 19:29:46 +0000 UTC]

Seen worst stuff.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ofthelight In reply to prosaix [2010-10-02 19:50:08 +0000 UTC]

*worse

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

xXFireFoxGirlXx In reply to ofthelight [2010-10-03 06:13:15 +0000 UTC]

LOL I LOVE YOU
11>10 amiriet? :'D

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ofthelight In reply to xXFireFoxGirlXx [2010-10-03 18:19:31 +0000 UTC]

HOLY SHIT YES
<3333333

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

prosaix In reply to ofthelight [2010-10-02 20:15:36 +0000 UTC]

*WORST

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ofthelight In reply to prosaix [2010-10-03 18:19:45 +0000 UTC]

Are you just trolling now?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prosaix In reply to ofthelight [2010-10-03 18:22:33 +0000 UTC]

Not unless you were right before.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ofthelight In reply to prosaix [2010-10-03 21:52:55 +0000 UTC]

I was. So you were.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

prosaix In reply to ofthelight [2010-10-03 22:30:45 +0000 UTC]

Seriously? Nope, I wasn't, but it was quite obvious that you were. One is american spelling, the other UK english. Really.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ofthelight In reply to prosaix [2010-10-04 02:33:15 +0000 UTC]

We have both worse and worst in the US.

Worst: bad or ill in the highest, greatest, or most extreme degree

Worse: bad or ill in a greater or higher degree; inferior in excellence, quality, or character.

Which would be to say that you had seen worse than the presented, however you said you had seen worst, which would require a "the" before "worst", thus indicating that you had indeed seen the graffiti of the least quality, ever.

I'm not trolling, fyi. It's called actually understanding the language. Unless you can legitimately dispute this with definitions and linear reasoning. But I suppose not. You poor dear.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>