HOME | DD

Published: 2007-12-11 01:00:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 49247; Favourites: 303; Downloads: 2611
Redirect to original
Description
I'm not dead! Coursework and bunch of stuff I won't bother you with keeping me away. You know the drill.Anyways, this was a request from Kooh on the Process forums. Basic idea is a sequence of him into a goth chick. Mental change thrown in as well. See the lines around his/her head? That's the mental stuff. At least to me it is, hard to show in a way.
Plus, I guess the definition of the goth look can be stretched. Maybe this crosses into a little more of a lolita territory, I'm not sure. anyways, enjoy.
Related content
Comments: 16
leila-stoat [2008-03-16 13:17:18 +0000 UTC]
Oooh, I always love goth transformations... they're always so cute no matter what!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BisectedBrioche [2008-01-10 00:21:36 +0000 UTC]
Would you mind if I had a go at colouring this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Daimajin17 In reply to BisectedBrioche [2008-01-10 16:50:43 +0000 UTC]
Sure. Knock yourself out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BisectedBrioche In reply to Daimajin17 [2008-01-13 23:49:42 +0000 UTC]
Consider me KO'd: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sharkhunter91132 [2007-12-14 22:26:57 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic! Tis was great. What about a guy into an emo chick? Granted kinda similar at first thought, but it could be really great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Roxio41-50 [2007-12-12 00:50:15 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure that's entirely goth. You have the lolita correct(mostly) but...it's not quite there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
FieldsOfFire In reply to Roxio41-50 [2008-02-18 20:33:56 +0000 UTC]
I did a search for goth and one for lolita on this site, and I didn't see much of a difference. Heavy shoes, striped socks, frilly dresses, thick makeup, and a proliferation of black were common with both. Personally, I think it's a bit ridiculous to try and categorize things like that. Obviously, there's a difference between lolita and, say, African folk art, but between lolita, goth, emo, and even punk? Can't say I see much of a difference.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
FieldsOfFire In reply to FieldsOfFire [2008-02-19 00:03:36 +0000 UTC]
Excuse me for not having a membership two months ago.
What I'm saying is that "over-genre-izing" art, if you will, takes away from the art itself. People are too focused on saying "is it punk? Is it goth-punk? Is it goth-metal?" to appreciate the art itself. The best transcend genres.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Roxio41-50 In reply to FieldsOfFire [2008-02-18 21:23:46 +0000 UTC]
Boy, that made me smile- how you care so much for something said 2 months ago.
Alright, I guess you're just trying to say this pic just belongs to some sub-genre that stereotypically wears black.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Daimajin17 In reply to Roxio41-50 [2007-12-12 02:04:04 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I can't even get stereotyping right. Maybe I should stick to easier ones. Hell, everybody loves cheerleaders.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Roxio41-50 In reply to Daimajin17 [2007-12-12 02:47:14 +0000 UTC]
I don't like cheerleaders, but that's not importaint.
Just search "lolita" on dA, Google Images, or Wikipedia has a good page on it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Damn-Lucky [2007-12-11 02:44:10 +0000 UTC]
Great work! Been abit of a fan of your sequences you could say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1