HOME | DD

DarkMechanic β€” Shade or no Shade?

Published: 2013-11-13 13:47:51 +0000 UTC; Views: 3009; Favourites: 107; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Guys, what do you think, start adding shading to my illustration if it suits it? Or stick to just plain colours? Looked at this a fair bit already today, so my eyes are a bit too used to it. But any recommendations or advice would be cool for when I resume tomorrow and decide.


- DM

Related content
Comments: 55

DarkMechanic In reply to ??? [2016-07-07 16:07:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, and yeah, I'm missing using flat colours now

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AshleyDesignSmith [2016-01-05 01:01:44 +0000 UTC]

shade! they both look great!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JU5T-DAV3 [2015-03-18 16:24:59 +0000 UTC]

Shade

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KittyUlquiorra [2015-02-18 22:37:17 +0000 UTC]

Shade

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cgCCCP [2015-01-17 14:25:40 +0000 UTC]

shade

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kashbugg [2014-08-10 21:43:34 +0000 UTC]

I love them both...but the one with shade looks a little more sinster and I love sinister characters :3 Great work by the way

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to Kashbugg [2014-08-13 12:10:49 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bmkorkut [2014-06-19 06:20:21 +0000 UTC]

No shade! That way, your personal style is more visible. With the shade, it becomes a little bir standart, ie. a little bit boring.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Larie-Meo [2014-03-08 13:27:15 +0000 UTC]

Shade.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

efawjedi [2013-12-18 02:04:43 +0000 UTC]

Jason X, LOL!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

line-melte [2013-12-11 23:20:24 +0000 UTC]

It depends how realistic you want to be, and how much time you have! Personally I prefer it with shading.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

StGeorge67 [2013-11-19 21:41:30 +0000 UTC]

No shade.
The shading on the right is more realistic, but it is softing the artistic look. The clean lines and straight color areas have a very direct/sharp expression. The shadow takes this artistic effect (which can't be recieved by for example photos or photorealistic images. The clean way is the more artistic way. LESS IS MORE. Illustrations in general are very often "over done".
This is a decision...and you decide it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to StGeorge67 [2013-11-20 16:55:29 +0000 UTC]

yeah I'm thinking along the same lines. I like the way it gives depth to fabric, but feel its a tad unnecessary if it's not needed. Thanks for feedback!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LliaOlsen [2013-11-19 07:43:13 +0000 UTC]

What about a mixture of both. I noticed another artists take on shading and it looked phenomenal.
fav.me/d2ytppz

The shirt, pants, hair isn't shaded, but the face and arms are.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to LliaOlsen [2013-11-20 16:54:12 +0000 UTC]

yeah its about using it correctly, just wondering if it should a special thing ir something that I mix in as a matter of course with my future illustrations.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MalariaMoon [2013-11-16 03:24:49 +0000 UTC]

No shade!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

redbeltboxer [2013-11-15 13:17:31 +0000 UTC]

cool style. i dig both. but shade i think creates more depth and improves the perspective of the character. It gives the blade more substance.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to redbeltboxer [2013-11-20 16:57:30 +0000 UTC]

thanks for your feedback, I agree it gives the material depth, but may be unnecessary anywhere else.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

21FlyingBananas [2013-11-15 04:20:54 +0000 UTC]

Oh definitely shade. It adds so much more drama and affect to him. Good job!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to 21FlyingBananas [2013-11-15 09:49:50 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sonata34 [2013-11-14 12:57:26 +0000 UTC]

personally Β the shaded one, looks more detailed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

l33t-p3ngu1n [2013-11-14 10:48:44 +0000 UTC]

Shaded does look more menacing but only slightly

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

robSHEPart [2013-11-14 07:22:07 +0000 UTC]

Shade (and hilights). It's those finishing touches that really bring out the best of art.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MidNight-Vixen [2013-11-14 07:00:00 +0000 UTC]

shade ^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LucasSchneider [2013-11-14 05:23:16 +0000 UTC]

I like the shade, so much more depth. Although I've always loved your style anyway.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to LucasSchneider [2013-11-14 13:59:52 +0000 UTC]

thanks, I like how the shade looks on the jacket, but it may be unnecessary. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Musiopath [2013-11-13 23:40:38 +0000 UTC]

The shading is a bit distracting.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

The-last-art [2013-11-13 23:37:53 +0000 UTC]

not shade!


πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ConqueringAlien [2013-11-13 21:17:50 +0000 UTC]

I think you can do without shading.

You seem to show depth very well just using line weight. I feel the extra shade on top of that is redundant.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to ConqueringAlien [2013-11-14 11:02:29 +0000 UTC]

I'm leaning towards that as well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TwoHairsInOneHole [2013-11-13 21:13:42 +0000 UTC]

I say shaded!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mr-Dr-Sweetness [2013-11-13 20:10:55 +0000 UTC]

I say shaded.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bagelbites101 [2013-11-13 19:36:43 +0000 UTC]

Dis looks nice with shading.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Odomi2 [2013-11-13 19:32:51 +0000 UTC]

The shading adds more depth to the illustration, but it just depends on the context.

In this case I prefer the shaded one.



πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to Odomi2 [2013-11-14 13:54:49 +0000 UTC]

yeah i agree, context is key

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Szczurzyslawa [2013-11-13 19:23:26 +0000 UTC]

I prefer no-shaded one

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jbrenthill [2013-11-13 18:20:59 +0000 UTC]

I like things about both, but I do think you did an excellent job with the shading!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to jbrenthill [2013-11-14 11:02:04 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

demotic-doodles [2013-11-13 17:00:15 +0000 UTC]

light shading is always good

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

s-731 [2013-11-13 16:51:55 +0000 UTC]

Can't...make ....up....mind.....(head explodes)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Generalflood [2013-11-13 16:20:24 +0000 UTC]

shaded is really good but idk how it'd look against a background in comparison to the original

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to Generalflood [2013-11-14 13:54:33 +0000 UTC]

thanks, was thinking of keeping the background clean for this one

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HoskarSS [2013-11-13 15:48:48 +0000 UTC]

i prefer shaded version!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Orbital-Primeval [2013-11-13 15:36:33 +0000 UTC]

I'm likin' the shade.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ph34rth33vil [2013-11-13 14:52:52 +0000 UTC]

the shade adds a level of demention that your other illustrations are missing. the character feels like hes seperate from the background when you add shading.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to ph34rth33vil [2013-11-14 11:01:42 +0000 UTC]

true enough, although I could put a shadow behind the left one to make it stand out a bit.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DeadCobra [2013-11-13 14:40:55 +0000 UTC]

Cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JessyRuiz [2013-11-13 14:15:11 +0000 UTC]

to shade or not to shade...ah that is the question.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

spidermanfan2099 [2013-11-13 13:56:50 +0000 UTC]

Either no shade... or tweak the shade to a slight blue tint rather than just adjusting the darkness alone! Work up the idea of there being warm area's in light, and cool area's in dark.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DarkMechanic In reply to spidermanfan2099 [2013-11-14 11:00:57 +0000 UTC]

Good point, didn't think of that to be honest. I'm not sure how putting another bunch of colours ontop of the palette thats already being used will look though. I'm not trying to be realistic either.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>