HOME | DD

davest — Attraction v2 [NSFW]

Published: 2004-12-07 19:29:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 102; Favourites: 0; Downloads: 33
Redirect to original
Description So i decided to re do this old deviation. I decided to re do it cause now that i have a better technique, i can show these girls in a much more detailed way...at least with better lines. So yeah, tell me what you think.
Oh, i also changed the red bg from the old attraction for this corner of a room. I gave it a little...minimalistic touch should we say? Anyway, thats all.
Related content
Comments: 36

Galahad-Delacroix [2006-02-16 23:29:03 +0000 UTC]

ooo advisory......no tengo en el mio...jmm....voy a dibujar a alguien en bola....muy teso!!! del putas...jeje

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to Galahad-Delacroix [2006-02-17 01:49:08 +0000 UTC]

jaja gracias.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Drift150 [2004-12-13 02:36:09 +0000 UTC]

bacano, su tecnica ha mejorado mucho.

el color de la q esta en el piso esta como raro... como muy "pantera rosa"

de resto esta genial

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to Drift150 [2004-12-13 03:08:26 +0000 UTC]

pantera rosa!! LOL! si..supongo...pero bueno. Gracias por el comment. Oiga, btw, que paso esta tarde que estaba todo mal?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

selkies86 [2004-12-10 11:30:40 +0000 UTC]

davis , thats a pic of the fashion show, but I dunno who it is.. If its me though.. thank you for blurring me ROFL!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to selkies86 [2004-12-10 18:01:13 +0000 UTC]

^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pantoffelgeist [2004-12-09 16:34:40 +0000 UTC]

jajaja la foto del fashion es un buen toque, las figuras se ven un poco demasiado estaticas pero esta del putas, muy bien logrado felicitaciones

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to Pantoffelgeist [2004-12-09 19:56:27 +0000 UTC]

gracias! creo que fue el unico que se dio cuenta que era del fashion... (de los que saben sobre el fashion) haha

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pantoffelgeist In reply to davest [2004-12-09 22:10:00 +0000 UTC]

jajaja fue un buen toque y lo accepto

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

juanIncubus [2004-12-08 01:54:01 +0000 UTC]

It does look better than the first one, how did you it? I mean.. the inking via PC.. you've got to tell me, dude!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to juanIncubus [2004-12-08 04:42:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment. It was rather quick this time. I needed to practice inking in the PC. I browsed some scanned sketches and found that one. I started the inking with the regular pencil tools and stuff and then coloured in. The lights and bg was something extra i wanted to do to make this one a bit different from the original.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

geschmack [2004-12-07 23:24:39 +0000 UTC]

Good job. Great inking and colouring. The shadows look great too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to geschmack [2004-12-08 04:32:51 +0000 UTC]

Thanks gesch. Glad you liked it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Munia [2004-12-07 22:54:13 +0000 UTC]

Well, you should have drawn the picture hanging on the wall instead of using a blurred photograph, because it looks too detailed compared with the girls. I love the composition and the play of lights, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to Munia [2004-12-08 04:39:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the tips About the pictre in the back, i just wanted to give it that comic touch that i see ppl use now. Cartoon characters are the main thing, but in the back u get blurred photography as a background or jsut part of it. but i appreciate the comment. Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Munia In reply to davest [2004-12-08 14:16:36 +0000 UTC]

Not at all. ^-^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to Munia [2004-12-08 15:59:17 +0000 UTC]

^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NetPsycho [2004-12-07 22:32:22 +0000 UTC]

I agree with Marianne: more detail!

Btw, love the legs... greatly done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to NetPsycho [2004-12-08 04:35:46 +0000 UTC]

in what sence do u mean that more detail? Any help would come in handy

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NetPsycho In reply to davest [2004-12-08 16:41:23 +0000 UTC]

Maybe some facial features, more detail in their hair (perfect hair is hard to do, though), the hand of the standing one and nipples.

Heh heh, why a picture of Marianne?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to NetPsycho [2004-12-08 18:00:52 +0000 UTC]

oh, those details... who cares now LOL! its not marianne, look carefully.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NetPsycho In reply to davest [2004-12-08 18:10:55 +0000 UTC]

I guess this picture looks so good because of that lack of details...

But it's all blurry and my glasses don't help...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to NetPsycho [2004-12-08 19:25:46 +0000 UTC]

^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SiempreYo [2004-12-07 22:21:33 +0000 UTC]

can i just say hun.... haha, this is funny. i remember seeing this in your gallery before and i thought it was pretty good. HOWEVER..... i'm at school right now and there are tons of people in this room so i can't really see it that well or else people will wonder what i'm looking at...lol from what i saw in small view though, i loved the contrast from dark to light!! i can't comment on much else though or else....ummm yea. lol xo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to SiempreYo [2004-12-08 04:29:02 +0000 UTC]

Well when u check this one better, you'll see that its a lot better than the old one. I had no idea how to do a good inking job back then... With all this comic thing going on, i thought i'd practise computer inking and at the same time post a new deviation (which i hadnt done in a long time).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SiempreYo In reply to davest [2004-12-09 02:56:48 +0000 UTC]

ok... finally, after looking at it better, i feel like it should have more detail, but i like the simplicity of it. my only critique would be that umm yea, she does need some nipples...lol i also like how the floor and picture in the background are more detailed than the foreground, creates a nice contrast, and then the light is pretty good. oy... i just saw the girl's hand (the one standing up) and she at least needs a SUGGESTION of a finger.... anyway, i do like thsi one a lot better!! nice work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to SiempreYo [2004-12-09 03:00:13 +0000 UTC]

yeah, the thing is, I like this simple kinda cartooney style. Complete fingerless hands, nippleless girls and such...so thats why its not "so detailed" as ppl have asked...
Anyway, thanks for your comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SiempreYo In reply to davest [2004-12-09 03:19:24 +0000 UTC]

nippleless girls???? hahahaha.... so it's just a chunk of glands and fat there? i never said i didn't like it, i do, but just a little more would keep with the cartoony style and it could still be strong. your choice though, you're the artist here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to SiempreYo [2004-12-09 03:29:51 +0000 UTC]

haha...no worries, i appreciate the kind comments. Thanks anyway

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

selkies86 [2004-12-07 22:07:37 +0000 UTC]

lesbos!! my favorite.. quite sexy , but could use a bit more detail ??
big kiss
angelinalover

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to selkies86 [2004-12-08 04:24:42 +0000 UTC]

haha! indeed our fav more detail? dunno, wanted to keep that cartooney touch. Btw, recognize the picture in the wall?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

selkies86 In reply to davest [2004-12-08 11:02:44 +0000 UTC]

fuck!!!!!! IM the picture in the wall!!!!!ROFL!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davest In reply to selkies86 [2004-12-08 15:58:08 +0000 UTC]

ROFL!!!! fresca...mira bien

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tabytat62 [2004-12-07 19:33:15 +0000 UTC]

interesting... not somthing I would look at but I think it's art!
Nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Tabytat62 In reply to Tabytat62 [2004-12-07 19:46:30 +0000 UTC]

You did a great job too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

davest In reply to Tabytat62 [2004-12-07 19:45:17 +0000 UTC]

nice thinking, i forgot to say that in the comments part. Anyway, yeah, just needed to post something since i hadnt posted anything for a while now and i needed to practise computer inking so this was a great opportunity to do both at the same time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0