HOME | DD

DavidAyala — New World Order?

Published: 2010-10-30 04:37:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 4273; Favourites: 40; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description [EDIT 2 10.30.10] Moved to new account. This was posted in my previous gallery as well, and with the exception of my two DDs, this was my most viewed work at 5,409 views.

[EDIT 08.04.07] - due to the political content and therefore sensitive nature depicted in this artwork, I have written the description of this artwork to make my intentions as clear as possible. Frankly, I don't have time to sit around and debate the issue with pseudo-internet-intellectuals. I'd much rather create new artworks.
-------------------------------------------
I truly hate having to explain this artwork, because good art should stand on its own, but someone's bound to not get it. This preemptive strike should save me some grief.

1) THE DONKEY AND ELEPHANT
Should be the most obvious elements in the picture. Representing either side of politics, one is shown on either side of the smiling president. Their placement should represent balance. I placed the conservative Republican on the president's right side and the liberal Democrat on his left. This is all smoke and mirrors because no matter which one the voters select, you will still get the generic guy in the center.

2) THE PRESIDENT
The smiley face is from the Wal-Mart price reduction commercials. Bright yellow is the most eye catching color and was intentionally used in this picture to draw your attention from the flag. In this same way a politician also serves to draw your attention from real issues. His smile is reassuring. His speeches offer little or no insight into the inner workings of the government, but have more in common with the work of a god public relations firm. His words are meant to distract you, to calm you, to keep you happy and complacent.

3) THE 'NUMBER ONE' GESTURE
You would most likely think the president is raising his finger as a symbol of victory. He would have you believe that after winning the presidency, his political victory is a victory for the entire nation. Every four years this win is supposed to thrill us common folk. The 'number one' gesture could also represent selfishness. He alone has enormous power over the nation. He answers to virtually no one. This was not intended by the framers of the Constitution.
Consider this alternate interpretation. The smiling politician is an illusionist, a hypnotist. Consider that he is not raising his finger in a 'number one' gesture at all. He is simply pointing. Pointing away from the press conference. Away from partisan politics. Away from the constitution. Away from the stars in the flag. Away from himself. A common design and advertising ploy is to lead your eye around on a printed page with use of color and flow of design. A magician uses slight of hand to distract you while his other hand conceals the magic card. Politicians do the same with specific hand gestures.

4) THE CONSTITUTION
I have it hidden under the flag. The flag is a symbol, it can be referred to as the heart of the nation. By that line of thinking, then so is the constitution comparative to the brain. There are plenty of flag waving, so-called patriots who are thinking with their hearts and not with their minds. They do not know the Constitution or the original intent of the framers of the Constitution. The founding fathers have been badly misinterpreted by modern peoples and governments. That has trickled down to erroneous teachings in our schools which has lead to rampant ignorance and apathy in our nation. There are many glaring examples of this. I don't need to name them, I won't debate them with you, it's not the purpose of this work.

5) THE FLAG
It is a symbol. I couldn't resist playing with it. Let it be stated that I believe in what it stands for -- what it should stand for. This artwork is intended to be a political statement and I am aware that the Constitution allows me the right to make this statement. You needn't remind me.

At first glance the flag looks completely normal, but a close inspection reveals otherwise. A subtle effect if you're not looking at it, but obvious once you see it. I replaced the stars with another symbol, all of them except one. Has our nation been infected by that kind of thinking? Clearly it has as everyday people trade in their liberties to allow government to have more control of their lives. Days of a desire for personal accountability seem to be fading. There is also considerable frustration among people, many of us feel that our one voice -- our one vote -- cannot make a difference. That the one star represents the individual overpowered by government controls and regulations. Feeling powerless and surrounded by bad ideologies, ignorance and apathy.

6) THE PRESS CONFERENCE
The media paints the picture and we depend on them for an accurate depiction. The common man can only view the picture and take it at face value. Notice there are no microphones? Does it matter? Presidential speeches are national pep rallies. Rarely informative. Even so, the media will edit and reinterpret what is said. Everything must be reduced to short sound bytes for a nation of eMpTyV viewers with incredibly short attention spans.

7. NEW WORLD ORDER?
Why did I choose the title "New World Order?" for this artwork?

From wikipedia:
"New World Order (Novus Ordo Mundi) refers to a conspiracy in which a powerful and secretive group is claimed to be conspiring to eventually rule the world via an autonomous world government, which would replace sovereign states and other checks and balances in world power struggles. In new world order conspiracy theories, many significant occurrences are caused by a powerful secret group."

All conspiracy theories aside, I think that it is a safe assumption to say a vast majority of U.S. citizens do not trust their own government. While there may or may not be a secret society of super rich people pulling the strings of government, there is a more obvious concern. It is blatantly clear that there is a not-so-secret society of super-rich people pulling the strings of world governments. They are the left or right slanted media pretending to be unbiased. They are corporate lobbyists with self serving interests and financial access to government officials that the common man can never have. They are high profile actors who abuse their time in the spotlight by pushing a political agenda they barely understand. They are the super-wealthy business man who runs for office believing himself to be among the best of us, bust as a hoarder of personal wealth -- while others want for basic needs -- will actually be among the most immoral of any society. This is our real new world order and I don't much care for it. Do you?
Related content
Comments: 49

marcle33 [2018-02-21 06:43:21 +0000 UTC]

HELLO BROTHERS AND SISTERS,   ARE YOU INTERESTED IN THE WORLD OF FAME?? GETTING RICH. POWERFUL AND
FAMOUS? JOIN THE ILLUMINATI TODAY AND BECOME RICH.ILLUMINATI BRINGS YOU
INTO THE LIMELIGHT OF THE WORLD IN WHICH YOU LIVE IN TODAY. YOUR FINANCIAL
DIFFICULTIES ARE BROUGHT TO AN END IF YOU JOIN. WE SUPPORT YOU BOTH
FINANCIALLY AND MATERIALLY TO ENSURE YOU LIVE A COMFORTABLE LIFE.JOIN
ILLUMINATI AND GET YOUR SELF A HOUSE AND A CAR AND ALSO WITH THE SUM OF
(ONE MILLION DOLLARS) BENEFITS GIVEN TO NEW MEMBERS WHO JOIN ILLUMINATI.

1. A Cash Reward of one million dollars
2.A Dream House bought in the country of your own choice and a car
3.A V.I.P treatment in all Airports in the World
4.A total Lifestyle change
5.Monthly payment of $500,000.00 USD into your bank account every month as
a member

If you are interested of joining us in the great brotherhood Illuminati
riches satanic hand symbol contact us Email-(illuminatiworldofpopulation999com)
or call or you send a text (+2348066163720 or join us on whatsapp +2348066163720 visitors are welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SithEmperorCharizard [2013-04-16 07:22:32 +0000 UTC]

Now, a bombing incident occured in Boston, and we are one short step from the New World Order.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to SithEmperorCharizard [2013-05-01 00:47:45 +0000 UTC]

The world has gone insane.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thecomicnerd [2012-09-20 12:06:31 +0000 UTC]

What I never understood is why is the idea of a New World Order so implausible? Didn't many countries in the past have attempted to take over the world? They all tried and all failed, but however if they work together they all win which is dangerous and the United Nations might end up becoming the World's congress. It's the politicians and the people who fund them who are to blame. Although the puppet masters who control the politicians ALSO have puppet masters controlling them and are so secret, almost no knows about them.

I thought it was kind of obvious that the politicians have planned a new world order. They openly talk about "global citizenship" Most people for some reason don't believe this, but however, most people don't do their research. All of us should stand together. Every country in the entire planet is in danger of the globalists.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to thecomicnerd [2012-09-21 23:56:43 +0000 UTC]

The first Matrix movie had the psychology of all this down very well. Most people don't want to believe that world leaders might not have their best interests at heart -- people want to view the world through rose colored glasses. As g as their little corner of the world is ok. Knowing and accepting certain truths isn't exactly enlihtening. It's all actually very depressing to come to the realization about what's going on in the world.

It's all really not even that secretive. These people are blatantly open about it. It doesn't take much research to discover things like the ultra private Bilderberg meeting DO exist. And of course policy should not be determined behind close doors without transparency or representation, but people aren't up in arms about it -- why? Because we have iPhones and cars an careers that keep us chasing after a few measly trinkets which really only amount to debt. But if you tell people that, most people have been conditioned to believe you're some kind of conspiracy nut. It doesn't seem matter to people about the paper trail and evidence and blatant corruption.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thecomicnerd In reply to DavidAyala [2012-09-22 08:04:08 +0000 UTC]

That's part of the problem. Most people don't want to think their government would do that. Sort of like 9/11 and people say. "The government would never betray it's own people" I actually thought governments of the present and the past are kind of well known for doing that. There's be numerous false flags before so why is the idea of a government being tyrannical in America seem impossible? It's happened in every other country so why would we be the exception? I thought accepting truth should be enlightening even if the truth does hurt.

It is and it isn't. It's secretive in a sense that we don't know exactly what they say or what exactly they're planning, we just know it's not good. The bilderberg does exist but it still confuses me as to why people are comfortable having a group which consists of the most powerful people in the world meeting up and yet they can't get a word out of them. You'd think that alone would raise some eyebrows. They do say "New World Order" But they act as if it'll be a good order. It's kind of stupid for them to be talking about it, but they're pretty arrogant.

I believe people will wake up, the only problem is it'll be too little too late. But people are a lot more awake than they used to be and people are getting angry so that's something.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rylan247 [2012-09-12 03:40:19 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to Rylan247 [2012-09-21 23:58:13 +0000 UTC]

To at least certain degrees, it's not really up for debate. It's reality. How organized it all really is? Who really knows, but clearly you or I have no say in how the world works.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

deepblank [2012-07-06 19:17:13 +0000 UTC]

great image, and striking words - awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to deepblank [2012-07-06 19:43:17 +0000 UTC]

THanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cryptiic [2011-11-17 03:57:37 +0000 UTC]

Wonderfully pieced together. I would also add that nowadays, there is no longer any right or left. Left has now become moderate right, and right has become outright batshit crazy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to Cryptiic [2011-11-17 16:03:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. Funny how people view these things, though. In reality, hr in the States,, there is no "right" as a true right would be anti all this socialist/entitlement/bailout/Obamascare garbage. What we're actually seeing is the right has moved to the left as "Neocons" or "Rhinos" and our leftist media slanders the true right -- the tea party movement -- and paint them (as you put it) "outright batshit crazy" which of course isn't the case at all. And the left are still basically communists, which isn't meant as a derogatory term, they simply believe government should have the power to redistribute people's wealth.
To better understand how U.S. Government works, or is SUPPOSED to work (LOL) watch this brief clip and learn why the left is looney! [link] But yes, despite our differing views, there really isn't a left or right... just those with power, and those without it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cryptiic In reply to DavidAyala [2011-11-19 20:14:48 +0000 UTC]

If this isn't propaganda, I don't know what is:
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to Cryptiic [2011-11-20 01:53:00 +0000 UTC]

You're barkin' up the wrong tree with that, I'm no Perry fan. But it's not nearly as awful as the cult of personality of that won the Obama election. Ugh, what a disgrace when all the sheople voted for him just because Oprah told them to. But that's politics; it's sound-bytes and pandering.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bobsuncle1 [2011-10-25 14:27:14 +0000 UTC]

Very well thought through and flawlessly pieced together - I don't necessarily agree with your sentiment - but that aside, the work is very well done

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to bobsuncle1 [2011-10-25 15:11:31 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. And you're free to disagree if you like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kajm [2011-09-24 10:50:04 +0000 UTC]

I always read thru the comments, tho I don't neccesarily see Who is commenting as I read... soon as I saw 'how about a Star of David' I knew it had to be some total IDIOT... and boy howdy! was I right. *sighs* Trolls from the Left are bad enough, trolls from the right.... gah.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to Kajm [2011-09-24 17:09:01 +0000 UTC]

The left is worse... those guys are all into entitlements and big government control and have no understanding of how the economy works. The "star of David" comment doesn't represent any left OR right that I'm aware of, that's just strangeness. But still, don't discount any sort of theory, even the conspiracy theories. ALL theories are just that -- until they're proven. To question what we're told is just good science. it's good to look at the world from different points of view.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kajm In reply to DavidAyala [2011-09-24 18:24:00 +0000 UTC]

'To question what we're told is just good science.'

Excellent way to put it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to Kajm [2011-09-24 19:41:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Sometimes these political discussions just get out of hand. We all have to share the planet, though. Best not to get too worked up over these things.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MieWoharu-chan [2011-09-24 02:25:59 +0000 UTC]

lol new world order.

Conspiracies are hilarious.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to MieWoharu-chan [2011-09-24 09:32:03 +0000 UTC]

Why is that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MieWoharu-chan In reply to DavidAyala [2011-09-24 19:33:31 +0000 UTC]

Because it's all bullshit yet people still believe in it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to MieWoharu-chan [2011-09-24 19:39:56 +0000 UTC]

Come on, "it's all bullshit" is a broad generalization. A LOT of it is, but the fact remains that we certainly don't have all the information. What we DO know is certain factions of the government have been known to be corrupt. This is provable. The whys and wheres and whos? We don't know, and so people put together scenarios to try to figure it all out. SOMETIMES they turn out to be true and it becomes fact -- not theory. Me? I'm playing devil's advocate a little here. But to dismiss everything with no real grounds isn't the best approach. But hey, whatever gets you through the day!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MieWoharu-chan In reply to DavidAyala [2011-09-24 20:05:25 +0000 UTC]

I don't believe things without evidence, and the conspiracies nutjobs are the ones making the claims. The burden of proof lay with them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to MieWoharu-chan [2011-09-24 21:29:04 +0000 UTC]

Well, I hate to be the bringer of bad news, but plenty of these theoyey guys have better evidence than the mainstream news. I mean really, how much do you just accept as truth -- just because Anderson Cooper says so? I mean hey, believe whatever you want, but just don't be a sheep about it. Or do, I mean I can't tell you what to do. As far as burden of proof goes -- it falls on anyone making a claim. You claim it's all "bullshit" so in this case the burden falls squarely on your shoulders. And how is it someone who comes up with an idea that is outside the norm is labeled a "nutjob"? I mean they said that when some guy claimed the Earth was round, too. See how that turned out? I'm just saying, keep your mind open.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MieWoharu-chan In reply to DavidAyala [2011-09-24 21:38:47 +0000 UTC]

Science proved that the world is round. It can be backed up with evidence. I see no evidence for "NWO" or whatever you people want to call it. As for burden of proof:

[link]

I have an open mind. But it's not so open that my brain falls out.

P.S. Who is Anderson Cooper?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to MieWoharu-chan [2011-09-25 00:33:05 +0000 UTC]

LOL!
Ok, I'm glad you found a link on "burden of proof" that proves me right, since you made the "bullshit" claim. Good job and thank you fpr admitting you were wrong. Takes a big man to do that.

Honestly, I'm not here to argue with you, you can believe what you'd like. The reality is the NWO exists as both a conspiracy theory and also as a very real thing. That was expressed by George H. Bush, the new world order is a move towards globalism -- more UN, etc. It was stated, it is fact. To what level secret groups like the Bilderbergs are "controlling" things is unknown. Evidence does point to a very select group of wealthy people controling things in a way that was not intended by the U.S. Constitution. There are paper trails -- we know where the money is going in many cases. This is fact. Whether they all where cloaks and have secret code words? Who cares? I don't know, I'm proably wasting my time with you. I'm up for a good discussion, beyond that? Bleh.

Anyways, there's a description in the artwork that explains what is meant by it. I used a question mark in the tile because the purpose is to simply pose the question. You are welcome to draw your own conclusions, but because you reacted so strongly to it does tell me I did my job and did it well. Thank you for that. Peace!

Anderson Cooper? Geez, use Google.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

StephenW3st [2011-07-01 17:47:51 +0000 UTC]

Yet another reason why we need the second amendment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to StephenW3st [2011-07-11 21:13:18 +0000 UTC]

Indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Punktlicht-Flamme [2011-05-04 18:14:04 +0000 UTC]

I hope that the president stretchs his arm over the sleeve, and the NWO falls!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to Punktlicht-Flamme [2011-06-14 21:35:36 +0000 UTC]

Let's hope!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Punktlicht-Flamme In reply to DavidAyala [2011-06-16 11:54:11 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Druidrex [2010-12-28 20:56:08 +0000 UTC]

New World Order............I'll have a latte' please.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to Druidrex [2011-01-01 02:13:58 +0000 UTC]

Would you like that in a Tall, Grande, or Vente?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sharprm [2010-11-02 00:56:45 +0000 UTC]

How about a Star of David lapel on his jacket?

"Frankly, I don't have time to sit around and debate the issue with pseudo-internet-intellectuals."

I'm a internet-pseudo-intellectual, let's discuss the piece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to sharprm [2010-11-02 00:59:38 +0000 UTC]

How about not?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sharprm In reply to DavidAyala [2010-11-02 01:03:01 +0000 UTC]

Please?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to sharprm [2010-11-02 01:05:45 +0000 UTC]

Hey, no fair being courteous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sharprm In reply to DavidAyala [2010-11-02 01:07:21 +0000 UTC]

Put on the lapel or I'll start using cute emote icons. Don't make me do it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to sharprm [2010-11-02 01:16:07 +0000 UTC]

No way. It would drastically change the statement, even for people in the know. For the average clueless person, the symbol would be completely misinterpreted no matter how much I tried to explain it. Lose/lose situation for me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sharprm In reply to DavidAyala [2010-11-02 01:27:12 +0000 UTC]

Does that mean you agree in principal that Israel (before double agent Obama) owned both sides? From an Israeli newspaper:

[link]

I don't think I need to go into who the neocons were.

Anyway, it's alright if you don't change it. PS another thing people might associate with yellow is sadistic pederast, from 'Sin city'.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to sharprm [2010-11-02 02:37:59 +0000 UTC]

It means that most people I run across are only ready for truth in very small doses-- if any. It becomes overwhelming very quickly to people -- and immediately assumed as conspiracy because of being unable to cope -- when unveiling some of the monstrosities of the world at once. Take that as you will!

Sin City had its moments!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sharprm In reply to DavidAyala [2010-11-02 02:50:31 +0000 UTC]

Imo, you don't need to keep the truth a secret. People start believing even stupid things unquestionably, like Chuck Norris is awesome, if people hear it repeated enough. Why not say the ugly truth (as best you see it) as often as possible.

[link]

Anyway I should try and draw something and stop being a pseudo you know what. Sin city rocks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to sharprm [2010-11-02 03:27:18 +0000 UTC]

We live in a world where the truth isn't enough. Obama won an election on soundbytes and meaningless slogans through a cult of personality. The trouble there is that a small voice of truth has a real hard time competing against the giant media onslaught of propaganda, especially when trying to reach a group with a disdain for logic. If people would take truth at face value, it would be easier, but people LIKE their lies being told to them. Gives 'em a sense of security, even if it makes for a lousy coping strategy, but that's the way it goes.

The trouble with a group like the one you linked, however tempting to join as it may be, it actually serves as an obstacle to reach a liberal. The first thing they'll say is, "there's those dirty conservatives being stupid again" Know your enemy. Liberals in general operate on a "feel good" basis. Under the assumption that they're somehow Robin Hoods and they're saving the world from greedy capitalists. Riiiiight. Sure, it's a flimsy and emotional argument, but it's impossible to argue with emotion. So the objective shouldn't be to to teach liberals what to think through repetition and propaganda because they'll muck it up anyways. Instead, they need to be taught HOW to think. Common example: The green movement. You can't chase after environmental concerns until you have a stable economy. Such liberal activism costs money, and so it needs a stable foundation. Liberals are so frenzied over these false fears, they coff up their paychecks in the form of taxes, and give up their liberties. (Suckers!) Liberals never are concerned about creating that solid financial foundation-- and so they fail. Every time. Forget the fact that their global catastrophe scares are usually ponzi schemes. But it's also easy to get caght up in liberal-bashing (because they're easy targets) but one must also remember conservatives has failed us for decades. The neo-cons have done nothing to end the fav, reduce the debt and downsize the federal government either. The right is only less bad. Still not good enough.

Anyways, probably just preaching to the choir.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sharprm In reply to DavidAyala [2010-11-02 03:44:44 +0000 UTC]

"Under the assumption that they're somehow Robin Hoods and they're saving the world from greedy capitalists"

More like Jesus. At least Robin realised he had to take from someone to give to others.

Heh I actually founded that group. I figure Liberals are a lost cause. Even most so called "conservatives". But I'm operating under the assumption (delusion?) if you counter every big lie with a nice essay, somehow that will do something. Please let me know if that has been done somewhere already.

"The neo-cons have done nothing"

They did plenty for Israel. Neocons were Jews with 'goyim' speakers. But see now you're thinking "is he a crazy antisemite?". Because TV and the education system suggest that Jews are always the victims. Even communities on the internet reinforce this bizarre view (Goyim's, I mean Godwin's law). You're allowed to criticise God, just not Jews. There's evidence of Jews screwing around with social science, psychology, education etc. Apparently Israel pays its students to post counter arguments to 'antisemitic' pages:

[link]

I suppose my point is that Liberal bashing is the only way to the truth. You have to step down the 'racist' 'antisemite' 'homophobe' road to get to the truth, because these labels were designed to hide it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to sharprm [2010-11-03 03:52:36 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry, that was a typo on my part. It should have read "robbing hoods"

Liberals may be a lost cause, but if Arizona doesn't win against the federal government and do something about this amnesty crap, we're about to suddenly have millions of new democrats wanting to shape the country in a direction that caused their previous country to become a failed state. (If at first you don't succeed, move to another country and screw that one up, too. Beats learning from history.)

The trouble with writing a big long essay is it can be easily (even if meaningless) countered with one-word slogans like "hope" and "change". This is the enemy -- their battlycry is nonsense. And you can't counter liberal "feelings" with actual logic. So unfortunately your essay premise is flawed because liberals clearly aren't "thinkers", if they were -- they wouldn't BE liberals.

What happens is you will get typecast as a "crazy anti-semite" and then everything else you say becomes irrelevant. It works best to say "this specific individual" screwed up (or whatever he did), because if you blame a race or a religion -- a whole group, you are making that broad generalization and so your argument becomes dismissed based on HOW you present it, not actual content. These are societal rules. I didn't make them, but I do my best to make them work for me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sharprm In reply to DavidAyala [2010-11-03 04:51:54 +0000 UTC]

'It should have read "robbing hoods"'

Isn't it the same thing? Or is that a play on words, like people like Al Sharpton are actually ripping off those in the ghettos.

"So unfortunately your essay premise is flawed because liberals clearly aren't "thinkers", if they were -- they wouldn't BE liberals."

Sad but true.

"What happens is you will get typecast as a "crazy anti-semite" and then everything else you say becomes irrelevant."

So true. They extend their little status game from highschool.

"we're about to suddenly have millions of new democrats wanting to shape the country in a direction that caused their previous country to become a failed state."

It's the reconquista right? Don't you feel emancipated? Europeans conquered most of the world, yet they can't do shit to defend themselves now.

"a whole group, you are making that broad generalization"

I agree. I want to write an essay on generalisations.

"I didn't make them, but I do my best to make them work for me."

Goodluck to you. I'm going to keep on with the crazy anti-semite tactic, to be honest I enjoy it. Anyway, thanks for the discussion and feedback.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Merkahia [2010-10-30 04:39:15 +0000 UTC]

you are great

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DavidAyala In reply to Merkahia [2010-10-30 04:48:39 +0000 UTC]

LOL. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0