HOME | DD

#worldwariii #shipbucket #italiannavy #battleship
Published: 2015-08-23 12:22:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 10992; Favourites: 108; Downloads: 153
Redirect to original
Description
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luigi_Ri…let me know if you hate the paint job
9 x 3 15 in (381 mm)
4 x tri OTO 127 mm
8 x 20 mm ciws
8 x RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM)
Propulsion:
- 5 × General Electric/Avio LM2500+ gas turbines providing 88.000 hp
- 7 × diesel generators (13.200 KW)
Related content
Comments: 26
Davinci975 In reply to TheInfiniteSlayer [2019-06-16 02:54:57 +0000 UTC]
i can remember
and thanks for faving it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tzoli [2016-11-19 18:55:59 +0000 UTC]
I assume you meant 3x3 38cm cannons not 9x3 or 3x9 because such turret or such number of turret would be more than non-practical!
You have 5 Gas Turbines of the LM2500-40 type (LM2500+) which each produce 40.700shp and should produce a total of 203.500shp yet you only have 88.000shp less than a half of that! Something is very wrong here! Not to mention it looks like it have 4 shafts but 5 turbines! The number does not add up.
While the turrets are widely placed from each other giving stability for them I find the gun barrels way too long, like /65 calibre not to mention they are seem oversized and the aft turret is unreasonably highly placed. Many short range weaponry but no long range SAM capability meaning the ship is good for fleet defence at close range but useless at radar range.
Not knowing the displacement of the ship nor if it carry any armour I think it is a very top heavy design.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
articman123 In reply to Tzoli [2020-03-15 11:00:14 +0000 UTC]
There is an VLS cell in between 3rd turret and bridge. Why it isnt mentioned in stats?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Davinci975 In reply to Tzoli [2016-11-19 19:25:54 +0000 UTC]
ok i would to say one thing
ok two things
1 nothing about the Japanese battleship
2
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
articman123 In reply to Davinci975 [2019-06-12 16:32:20 +0000 UTC]
What nonsense are you talking?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
articman123 In reply to Davinci975 [2019-09-07 12:26:40 +0000 UTC]
Did you even read the comment above you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
articman123 In reply to Davinci975 [2019-09-12 14:51:21 +0000 UTC]
The wrong stats you posted and the complete nonsense about Japanese battleships you replied with.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0