HOME | DD

Delicious-Daim — xthermal typo

Published: 2006-12-18 00:16:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 8710; Favourites: 101; Downloads: 295
Redirect to original
Description xthermal logotype
Related content
Comments: 26

LSP-C [2013-09-06 23:59:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

woweek [2009-05-25 17:54:42 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely dope.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pwess [2007-08-30 10:27:14 +0000 UTC]

Very nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dopepope [2007-03-08 18:51:53 +0000 UTC]

killer

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

designalicious [2007-02-20 15:15:43 +0000 UTC]

Here's some good typo work!
[link]

ENJOY!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

guidopol [2006-12-24 15:28:47 +0000 UTC]

kapitalne

co to za czcionka?

zycze wesolych i spokojnych swiat

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Delicious-Daim In reply to guidopol [2006-12-25 01:16:19 +0000 UTC]

Nawzajem, czcionka nie ma jeszcze nazwy i nie jest kompletna.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

guidopol In reply to Delicious-Daim [2006-12-26 13:14:49 +0000 UTC]

aha spox bardzo ciekawa czcionka oby tak dalej

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

s3ss3nt [2006-12-23 21:57:13 +0000 UTC]

balanced, tight, legible & a nice treatment on the style chosen.. nice work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jessivw [2006-12-23 10:06:33 +0000 UTC]

sweet typeface... little hard to read though

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

paysm [2006-12-23 00:24:15 +0000 UTC]

kurewsko dobre!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

funcod [2006-12-19 23:50:08 +0000 UTC]

i really like the "al" thing >> brillant

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

collaps09 [2006-12-19 23:47:11 +0000 UTC]

'xtherman'? where?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sketchhog [2006-12-18 16:41:07 +0000 UTC]

I'm gonna have to disagree with the majority on this one. While the visual appeal of the logo is great (as usual), you seem to have compromised that for readability. When I first looked at the logo, I had no idea what it said. Then, after reading the title that it was indeed "xthermal", I still had a hard time deciphering the end of the word. Looks more like "xtherman" to me. Sorry, but this is someone's LOGO....their representation. If I had a business, I would hate it if people were always mispronouncing it because I agreed on a logotype that was hard to read.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xemuz [2006-12-18 16:10:02 +0000 UTC]

What about telling us about the technical work?

after you conceptualize what must be done which path you take?

drawing the vector line by line

or

you make a custom brush, draw the basic form and then apply in order to get the twin lines of the logo in perfect shape?

I hope you can give a minute to talk about that details.

Thx in advance

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tingen [2006-12-18 15:20:10 +0000 UTC]

sweet

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

qu4ku [2006-12-18 11:38:59 +0000 UTC]

na lodanie. tylko te a na pierwszy rzut oka trudno zidentyfikowac.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

B-positive [2006-12-18 09:36:15 +0000 UTC]

nice type, give us some background of the client next time

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

royal-crime [2006-12-18 07:40:30 +0000 UTC]

good work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

attackforce [2006-12-18 05:29:23 +0000 UTC]

nice and simple, sharp!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

slds-studios [2006-12-18 05:21:56 +0000 UTC]

delicious man.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SvobodaStudio [2006-12-18 03:42:04 +0000 UTC]

no calkiem mile. pozdrawiam i zycze wesolych swiat..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

russoturisto [2006-12-18 02:01:57 +0000 UTC]

this typo rocks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MrHavok [2006-12-18 01:00:44 +0000 UTC]

your logos are truly sick

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IOPNR [2006-12-18 00:44:34 +0000 UTC]

So sweet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FarCannell [2006-12-18 00:22:46 +0000 UTC]

Looks awsome! Good work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0