HOME | DD

Published: 2011-08-15 00:33:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 2145; Favourites: 114; Downloads: 25
Redirect to original
Description
This took me far too long. I'm not sure I'll ever draw another defective turret even if my life depended on it."1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law."
Photoshop CS4.
BUY IT HERE: digitalduckie.storenvy.com/col…
Related content
Comments: 17
McKiath [2013-12-22 15:27:59 +0000 UTC]
Silly Apeture. You build turrets to break the laws then told everyone they followed the laws of robotics.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DigitalDuckie In reply to McKiath [2013-12-22 16:27:45 +0000 UTC]
They never said they followed the laws. Just that they've been given the laws to read.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yumikay17 [2012-04-16 20:23:37 +0000 UTC]
and as it is ALL of the constructs at aperture pretty much break all three of these rules....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DBZFan12 [2012-02-27 21:15:09 +0000 UTC]
Then I'd say the turrets break rule 1 constantly, as they open fire on anything they see
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ZombieReaper [2011-10-30 18:15:21 +0000 UTC]
lmao, wonderfully well done ^^ especially on the defective turret, great detail
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrfjtrjh465478 [2011-08-16 12:03:21 +0000 UTC]
But those rules didn't apply to Portal and Portal 2 :<
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DigitalDuckie In reply to mrfjtrjh465478 [2011-08-16 15:33:53 +0000 UTC]
Well they couldn't read anyways.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrfjtrjh465478 In reply to DigitalDuckie [2011-08-16 17:49:36 +0000 UTC]
Looks like defective turret was the only guy/gal who couldn't read
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Trekkie4077th [2011-08-15 00:36:26 +0000 UTC]
It would be terribly ironic if the Defective Turrets could read.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DigitalDuckie In reply to Trekkie4077th [2011-08-15 00:56:21 +0000 UTC]
Well they're supposed to be blind. Or at least some of them are.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Trekkie4077th In reply to DigitalDuckie [2011-08-15 01:45:55 +0000 UTC]
That's the ironic part. I suppose the reading part could be part of their programming, but they wouldn't know they could read if they were blind.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0