HOME | DD

Dionisic — Show must go on 14

Published: 2011-07-22 14:21:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 526; Favourites: 35; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description ...
Related content
Comments: 14

Miss-Tbones [2011-08-04 00:00:42 +0000 UTC]

Such a lovely image, nice light on the side of the face! It's got a longing atmosphere to it! Great capture!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hermetic-Wings [2011-08-01 19:52:04 +0000 UTC]

oh well!
so reach B&Wcolour tonnes and beautifull composition...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to Hermetic-Wings [2011-08-01 19:55:36 +0000 UTC]

Thank you friend!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hermetic-Wings In reply to Dionisic [2011-08-01 20:42:45 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure dear Dennis

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HarisDrako [2011-07-25 22:35:13 +0000 UTC]

!!! !!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

noperson [2011-07-23 21:19:57 +0000 UTC]

i like this one most from all the set

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to noperson [2011-07-24 10:08:08 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! It's good to get a feedback.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PEN-at-Work [2011-07-22 22:34:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AlecBell [2011-07-22 21:52:05 +0000 UTC]

very dramatic, Denis, the bokeh in the background works very well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to AlecBell [2011-07-24 10:21:00 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Alec! I see what you mean, except, I think my lenses don't make good bokeh, and that digital cameras make some "clips" between the individual tones.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

noperson In reply to Dionisic [2011-07-24 23:18:11 +0000 UTC]

yes they do (although i don't know exactly what you mean by "clicks") - see here [link] . this is an old camera (digital) but those lines on the edge of progressive tones are visible and not natural [visible most notably right top corner - the ]. perhaps future digi cams will have that bug fixed.. perhaps the more modern models already do...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to noperson [2011-07-25 08:48:53 +0000 UTC]

Not "clicks", but "clips".
So, what would be your conclusion: is it only the chip or newer lenses too that makes such a mess? Over the past few days I test Nikon 35-70mm f/2.8, which is slightly older than the lenses that I own. I am considering to buy it. Namely, it gives all in kind of softer transitions: from one tone to another, from the sharpness to the blur. This is not something revolutionary better, but still is better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

noperson In reply to Dionisic [2011-07-25 11:11:54 +0000 UTC]

i think it isn't about the lenses - which are still basically glass. i reckon it is about the matrix of the sensor - the size of the individual pixels and/or the software used to process the data from the sensor. but it's just me thinking ...
and anyway so long as there are pixels instead of some uniform sensor - sort of one big "pixel" which would sense it more naturally - so long there will be the problem of man-made regularities within the image. better still - would be to copy the irregularity of silver cristals from traditional film, which were not placed on the film according to some predesigned grid, like trees in a man-planted forest, but rather found their room randomly - naturally..
my mind wanders... nevertheless - i do not mind it all so much

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to noperson [2011-07-25 16:01:46 +0000 UTC]

I think somehow similar.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0