HOME | DD

Published: 2010-11-09 21:11:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 683; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description
A round wall with windows in the end of a corridor. Eh, if only I had wide angle lens...Related content
Comments: 20
JonasJakobsen [2012-05-30 21:27:05 +0000 UTC]
yeah really cool photo, and you could buy a wide lens, but I preferer using photoshop to make wideangle photos
π: 0 β©: 1
Disfigurator In reply to JonasJakobsen [2012-05-31 05:48:33 +0000 UTC]
It's better to create the shot, not imagine it in Photoshop. And recently I bought a 28mm f/2.8
π: 0 β©: 1
JonasJakobsen In reply to Disfigurator [2012-05-31 06:46:42 +0000 UTC]
the only thing photoshop does is put the 6 to 9 photos, that one takes, but all right ofcourse it depents on ones style
π: 0 β©: 1
Disfigurator In reply to JonasJakobsen [2012-05-31 07:35:44 +0000 UTC]
6 to 9? I'm not sure what you meant. 16:9?
π: 0 β©: 2
JonasJakobsen In reply to Disfigurator [2012-05-31 07:43:35 +0000 UTC]
haha I didn't realice how old this discussion is
π: 0 β©: 1
JonasJakobsen In reply to Disfigurator [2012-05-31 08:36:24 +0000 UTC]
yeah sometimes I have to pay more attention to the date of the photo.
π: 0 β©: 0
JonasJakobsen In reply to Disfigurator [2012-05-31 07:39:16 +0000 UTC]
No 6 to 9 photos, that will be put together to make a panoramic photo. It's not 6by9
π: 0 β©: 1
Disfigurator In reply to JonasJakobsen [2012-05-31 08:22:52 +0000 UTC]
Oh, you're stitching together panoramas. That's completely different from wide angle shots.
π: 0 β©: 1
JonasJakobsen In reply to Disfigurator [2012-05-31 08:25:24 +0000 UTC]
yes I know, but the reason that I make panoramas, is because I don't like the look af a fisheye.
π: 0 β©: 1
Disfigurator In reply to JonasJakobsen [2012-05-31 08:42:06 +0000 UTC]
Wide angle does not mean fisheye - but you know that. And those fisheye distortions can be corrected in photoshop - to get lines straightened and such.
But yeah, panorama is just another option to get a wider view.
π: 0 β©: 1
JonasJakobsen In reply to Disfigurator [2012-05-31 08:45:56 +0000 UTC]
It was just my sugestion, but no it's not the same, not that one have to be an expert to see that
π: 0 β©: 1
Disfigurator In reply to Katherine-DeathMouse [2010-11-10 20:27:24 +0000 UTC]
Prieks, ka tΔ un paldies
π: 0 β©: 0
oxecotton [2010-11-10 13:55:43 +0000 UTC]
Love it, nice job! Wide angle is on my wish list as well...but I think you still captured it well.
π: 0 β©: 1