HOME | DD

Distantstarr In reply to The-Nuclear-Pegasus [2012-05-22 12:49:25 +0000 UTC]

thaaank you for all the *

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Nuclear-Pegasus In reply to Distantstarr [2012-05-22 16:00:17 +0000 UTC]

Welcomed.^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

taiki676 In reply to we-r-nomad [2012-04-25 04:19:52 +0000 UTC]

yes, they are operational

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

we-r-nomad In reply to taiki676 [2012-04-25 18:40:32 +0000 UTC]

I wonder how they'd stack up against Apaches?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

arthuro12 In reply to we-r-nomad [2012-04-26 18:48:01 +0000 UTC]

Depends on the situation really, both are on par minus the KA-50 having limited movement of the cannon and being operated by 1 man only.

Technology whise they are sorta on par.

You should get DCS: Black Shark and try it for yourself really, great sim.

Awesome work man, beauty of a machine.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

taiki676 In reply to we-r-nomad [2012-04-25 20:36:04 +0000 UTC]

Good question, but if I'm not mistaken both Kamovs and the Apache was built for ground attack/fire support role. I don't if any of them could be fitted with air-to-air weaponry?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

we-r-nomad In reply to taiki676 [2012-04-26 16:01:51 +0000 UTC]

Interesting point you make. I suppose I always match like vehicles against each other because it see's one would be best suited to hunt the other.

Since attack helicopters have performance envelopes analogous to WWI biplanes, it's hard not to entertain romanticized notions of Apaches dogfighting against Blacksharks.

Guess I've been watching too much Airwolf.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Distantstarr In reply to Dan-S-T [2012-04-24 21:57:27 +0000 UTC]

Ka-50 & Ka-52

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dan-S-T In reply to Distantstarr [2012-04-24 21:59:31 +0000 UTC]

They would compliment well with an Mi-28 Havoc

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to Dan-S-T [2012-04-24 22:02:43 +0000 UTC]

agreed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0