HOME | DD

dojoh β€” lightning bulb

Published: 2005-07-08 08:51:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 15528; Favourites: 534; Downloads: 8877
Redirect to original
Description bulbsession with =Gwarf . please have a look at his works too.

EDIT: i reduced the contrast... but its not the final version.. i'll upload the final version on monday when i'm at home. then i'll update the print too.
EDIT2: the temp version was ugly.. so i edited it at =Gwarf 's pc again. print will be updated soon.
EDIT3: a little less blub a little more bulb print will be updated soon
Related content
Comments: 180

WildAtHeart In reply to ??? [2005-07-12 19:25:28 +0000 UTC]

na logo!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dojoh In reply to WildAtHeart [2005-07-15 18:21:01 +0000 UTC]

wuhhee du wirst auch in meiner Dankesrede erwΓ€hnt!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nicolaos [2005-07-10 16:10:21 +0000 UTC]

I liked this alot better than the single bulb session that =Gwarf posted, good stuff guys. Love it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GeMir [2005-07-09 21:00:04 +0000 UTC]

Great work!..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

levdir [2005-07-09 20:26:34 +0000 UTC]

Ohmigod. How was this taken? How did you manage to run current through the bulb without having it in a socket? Incredible. I thought this was a fractal at first...the fact that it's a photograph is simply amazing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mOrbo [2005-07-09 20:12:21 +0000 UTC]

awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TOCZ [2005-07-09 19:52:14 +0000 UTC]

i like this a lot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

greenfroggies [2005-07-09 17:51:07 +0000 UTC]

absolutely fantastic, beautiful and intriguing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kamermans [2005-07-09 17:34:07 +0000 UTC]

that really is great!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ultimategordita [2005-07-09 15:38:37 +0000 UTC]

Spelling Error?
Is It Supposed To Be
Lighting Blub (In The Picture Itself)
Instead Of...
Lightning Bulb?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dojoh In reply to ultimategordita [2005-07-09 21:34:00 +0000 UTC]

you are right :-/ i'm just to stupid to work with several different versions on different computers... i'll fix it tomorrow or perhaps monday :-/

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ultimategordita In reply to dojoh [2005-07-10 04:31:01 +0000 UTC]

I'm Just Happy You'll Be Able To Fix It Before You Send It Out The Prints XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Soczi [2005-07-09 13:56:14 +0000 UTC]

how do you that

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Khallandra [2005-07-09 13:54:58 +0000 UTC]

That is very enat, I love the 'time lapse' kinda effect - or would it be comic... is there an actual term? Anyway

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ki0o [2005-07-09 12:25:45 +0000 UTC]

but this is amazing!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Xenn [2005-07-09 11:34:54 +0000 UTC]

hmm well if you ever say how to do this sed me a note of it, so i dont have to track you down lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dojoh In reply to Xenn [2005-07-09 12:00:16 +0000 UTC]

well feel free to watch me i'd submit it as a deviation.. but i'm not if i will submit it at all

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenn In reply to dojoh [2005-07-09 13:24:10 +0000 UTC]

going for the watch right off the bat now are we?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

darkshadowblaze In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 10:14:27 +0000 UTC]

I thought I was impressed by your other photo of the bulb, but this definitely tops it! I'm adding this as my +fav too

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dojoh In reply to darkshadowblaze [2005-07-09 21:42:56 +0000 UTC]

hehe thanks a lot i'm not sure which version i prefere. both are cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

darkshadowblaze In reply to dojoh [2005-07-10 12:12:50 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome!

I know what you mean about that.. That's why I had to add both to my :fav:

I love doing effects like that, but I haven't had the opportunity to try everything out.. I should *blushes*

Maybe during the summer I'll get doing to doing all that

Thumbs up!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chashmodai In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 08:48:29 +0000 UTC]

i agree- it seems too sharpened- especially where the smoke is. perhaps if you selected an area- if you want to i mean. i like this composition still. may i say the last one on the right looks like a penis almost?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dojoh In reply to chashmodai [2005-07-09 09:24:54 +0000 UTC]

well its one of my tics that i love very sharp images with great contrasts. but perhaps this one got too high high contrasts. i'm not at home and only got my laptop monitor which is not thaaat good.
thanks for the comment

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

usedtoit03 In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 07:08:55 +0000 UTC]

I think the image has been over sharpened, it doesn't seem very smooth at all and the smoke doesn't look natrual. However this is a very cool idea, and the presentation is very professional. Well done!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dojoh In reply to usedtoit03 [2005-07-09 09:26:31 +0000 UTC]

youre right.. if i'll get home and have my better bigger monitor i'll fix that ... my laptop is to weak to work with that... its just like click... waaaaiiiit.. click click. waaitt..click... waiiit... waaaiiitt

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AzellureLeverett In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 07:01:33 +0000 UTC]

That is just totally Stunning. Truly excellent

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pwm In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 07:00:02 +0000 UTC]

wow, thats fantastic... very original too, ive never seen anything like it. How did you wire that up? how is it standing up straight?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zimm In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 06:57:35 +0000 UTC]

brilliant!!
(get it....ha ha ha ha ha)

no really..........excellent concept, and great shots

must fav

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xViolentBeautyx [2005-07-09 06:40:16 +0000 UTC]

Amazing, I love how the flame gets bigger as the line progresses. It's so beautiful, oddly since it is a lightbulb. Heheh.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DelightfulDes In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 05:01:00 +0000 UTC]

This is so unique and beautiful. I love the way you've captured the flames and the way they curl at the tips as if licking the darkness. I also really like the progression from no flame to really big flame. Wonderful work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Aramas In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 04:06:40 +0000 UTC]

ooo very cool. Is this what happens to the filament when theres no vacum? great work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dojoh In reply to Aramas [2005-07-09 09:29:50 +0000 UTC]

yabb

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

apocryphal-lodger [2005-07-09 03:51:21 +0000 UTC]

Fantastisch! Really liked it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chromophobic In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 03:44:50 +0000 UTC]

This is so kool! Very well executed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MisguidedAngel [2005-07-09 03:10:32 +0000 UTC]

thats effin awesome, i love it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

iramojo [2005-07-09 02:07:49 +0000 UTC]

aw mah gawd! thats... awsome! +fav!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

billsabub In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 01:02:16 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic work!

Both you and =Gwarf should be proud.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

coyotejack [2005-07-09 00:52:49 +0000 UTC]

I'm very, very impressed. FAV!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverMelinda In reply to ??? [2005-07-09 00:50:34 +0000 UTC]

beautiful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

flugo [2005-07-09 00:02:19 +0000 UTC]

Man!! this pic is even better

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KaRaZyJeW [2005-07-08 23:47:29 +0000 UTC]

AWSOME!! Does it come in 1600x1200?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ldo [2005-07-08 23:27:52 +0000 UTC]

Awesome... I'm speechless

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

shiniliz [2005-07-08 23:23:59 +0000 UTC]

nice captures
i like the crispness of it
^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fairydragon [2005-07-08 23:01:05 +0000 UTC]

amazing..................................................................just amazing and beautiful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

redewe In reply to ??? [2005-07-08 22:01:26 +0000 UTC]

wow...the effort and the technical details....excellent

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Perlekes In reply to ??? [2005-07-08 21:48:17 +0000 UTC]

Great...this isn't areal..it can't ...
it's excelente

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fade-out [2005-07-08 21:29:15 +0000 UTC]

fette sache!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

cansrox [2005-07-08 21:26:44 +0000 UTC]

was habt ihre denn der glΓΌhbirne angetan!!?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dojoh In reply to cansrox [2005-07-09 09:33:33 +0000 UTC]

nΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌΓΌxxxxxx

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

cansrox In reply to dojoh [2005-07-09 09:43:06 +0000 UTC]

ey, jetzt sag doch mal! habt ihr sie einfach kaputtgemacht?!! wie unverschΓ€mt...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>