HOME | DD

Published: 2009-10-18 10:57:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 8034; Favourites: 126; Downloads: 121
Redirect to original
Description
A matched pair of systrums made from deer antler and brass. A little over a foot high.I got this pair of antlers with the tips already cut off, so obviously they were meant to be systrums. I rounded and polished the cuts and the bases, carved spirals in the bases, carved the spiral and wave designs on the fronts (the backs are plain) and stained the edges of the designs. Each systrum has ten pair of brass disks (hand hammered into concave shape) strung on brass wires shaped to keep the disks in place but let them clash together when the systrums are shaken.
This is a good example of the limitations of using a scanner for pictures of 3D objects (which is how most of the pictures in my gallery are done). First, the systrums are too large for my scanner, and I had to scan the top and bottom ends separately (two scans each for two systrums, so four scans altogether) and join the images in Photoshop. Second, because of the shape of the antlers, the ends (which are already lighter in color) are against the glass and brightly lit, while the middle is up about three inches above the glass and only dimly lit. They look much better in actuality, and I hope to have some good camera shots of them later.
UPDATE: Here is a digital camera photo: [link]
Related content
Comments: 49
badassbonestaxidermy [2013-12-06 20:55:47 +0000 UTC]
This is very creative! Never seen anything like it!
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to badassbonestaxidermy [2013-12-06 22:38:02 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I look at stuff and see what it could be, and sometimes the result is very strange....
π: 0 β©: 0
Darkbookworm26 [2013-07-02 17:09:27 +0000 UTC]
these are so cool. I have discovered I love Systrums <3
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to Darkbookworm26 [2013-07-02 18:22:14 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I've made only four systrums so far, but they were fun to design.
π: 0 β©: 0
DonSimpson In reply to Purgatoire [2010-10-17 03:09:38 +0000 UTC]
Oh, it is. I wish all my stuff turned out that well.
π: 0 β©: 1
Purgatoire In reply to DonSimpson [2010-10-17 10:41:21 +0000 UTC]
Everytime I take a look I get a picture in front of my inner eye.... something druid, shaman, werewolf like
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to Purgatoire [2010-10-17 23:44:12 +0000 UTC]
Me too, but I am terrible at drawing people, so I don't make an actual version of the picture. Very frustrating. *Goldenwolf could do it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Purgatoire In reply to DonSimpson [2010-10-18 15:48:49 +0000 UTC]
I saw his gallery a while ago, but I prefer other styles ^^
like Abras Ajmal or DH666 (he made such a AWESOME werewolfportraitβ₯).
But I had to write down all the details of my inner picture, otherwise a comission wouldn't make sense, and then on the other site, you wouldn't leave much space for the artists own creativity.
Or what do you think?^^
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to Purgatoire [2010-10-19 08:25:15 +0000 UTC]
Goldenwolf is a woman, and does a lot of romantic werewolf art, but I think she gets the shamanic aspect. DH666 does gruesome and horrific very well, and looks to me to be a better choice for a scary werewolf. I haven't seen anything by Abras Ajmal.
It seems to me that there is always some space for an artist's own creativity, which is why it's important to choose an artist whose style you like. Whether the space was large enough for that particular artist is indeed another thing.
π: 0 β©: 1
Purgatoire In reply to DonSimpson [2010-10-19 15:24:48 +0000 UTC]
I know, but thats what I meant, I don't like that romantic thing that much, I love the aspect of horror!
Ajmal did some White Wolf Artworks.. [link] (I',m not sure if I spelled it correctly)
And you can mix shamanic/nature stuff with the creepiness factor imo
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to Purgatoire [2010-10-19 19:00:29 +0000 UTC]
Well, there it is. My mental image from my systrum set is of mystical / mysterious / romantic shamanism, so I think of *Goldenwolf . But shamanic / nature themes can indeed be done horrifying / creepy / heroic or any of several other ways, and I'd love to see what ~DH666 or ~Abi909 (Abrar Ajmal) would do with that. Brom has done some horror shamanic pieces that I love. [link] I have a couple of his art books.
π: 0 β©: 1
Purgatoire In reply to DonSimpson [2010-10-19 19:08:58 +0000 UTC]
Ahh I know his Art... I think I watch his deviant stuff too.
And I even faved a pic of him, but it doesn't changes that I would prefer Dh666's style, cuz his pics look so realistic... I love that
Just like they could jump out and tear you apart.
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to Purgatoire [2010-10-20 02:54:02 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, Brom's stuff is a bit stylized, in a way that tends to make even his most gruesome themes more beautiful than really raised-hackles scary.
π: 0 β©: 1
Purgatoire In reply to DonSimpson [2010-10-20 14:44:01 +0000 UTC]
Thats what I meant!
btw, you should do a guide to do that awesome skulls
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to Purgatoire [2010-10-20 19:49:06 +0000 UTC]
Well, I have this: [link]
π: 0 β©: 1
Purgatoire In reply to DonSimpson [2010-10-20 20:21:40 +0000 UTC]
YAY ;D
Now I have to organize a skull
Thank you! ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
DonSimpson In reply to DianaKennedy [2010-03-17 20:32:22 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
I've done a few rustic systrums for people, but I think this is my best.
π: 0 β©: 0
AvocadoArt [2009-11-17 20:12:05 +0000 UTC]
Dear Don
You really have the spirit for the natural flow. Thanks for sharing.
Best regards
Marcus
π: 0 β©: 1
Bright-Circle [2009-10-20 13:53:10 +0000 UTC]
They look neat. What exactly are systrums? Some kind of musical instrument?
π: 0 β©: 2
DonSimpson In reply to Bright-Circle [2023-09-20 09:28:44 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
DonSimpson In reply to Bright-Circle [2009-10-20 22:32:31 +0000 UTC]
You shake them and the disks slide and clash together and make sounds. There is also a version that has metal rods sliding back and forth in a metal framework. The ancient Egyptians and various other old-time peoples used them, and they are still being made.
π: 0 β©: 1
Bright-Circle In reply to DonSimpson [2009-10-21 14:25:12 +0000 UTC]
Oh neat! I'd heard of them, but never did know exactly what they were before.
π: 0 β©: 0
lemonfruitpie [2009-10-19 05:28:45 +0000 UTC]
Wow, these are really beautiful. It's amazing how symmetrical they are; I thought it was the same antler mirrored, for a moment. As always, your carving is impeccable. Nicely done!
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to lemonfruitpie [2009-10-19 06:52:11 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I tried to make them fairly symmetrical. They have slightly different shapes and slightly different proportions to the design, but I think they look well together.
Usually when I have a double picture like this, it's the front and back of one piece, and some people think it's of two separate items. This time it really is two items.
π: 0 β©: 1
lemonfruitpie In reply to DonSimpson [2009-10-20 04:36:57 +0000 UTC]
They really do look good together! Again, great job
π: 0 β©: 0
deeahCHUR [2009-10-18 18:24:34 +0000 UTC]
Those are very cool! Not only is it a neat design, but the forms and coloration work very well together.
π: 0 β©: 1
antilogicgirl [2009-10-18 16:05:22 +0000 UTC]
Great work! We have to scan 3-D objects at work a lot. You really do run into that problem all of the time. It always ends up looking way too hazy. We have to use pieces of velvet as a background because we cut the objects out in photoshop. Not sure if you'd want to do that, though. Might try what Beledra said. Take a photo instead.
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to antilogicgirl [2009-10-18 18:46:30 +0000 UTC]
The centers are not just poorly lit, but a bit out of focus; the scanner has more depth of field than one might think, but still only a few inches. I have pieces of velvet, but I also have a box full of materials for use as scan backgounds (silk samples and other cloths, paper, etc.) in different colors and textures, and I can put these on top of the object or suspend them above it.
π: 0 β©: 1
antilogicgirl In reply to DonSimpson [2009-10-19 03:54:01 +0000 UTC]
Suspending the object above the scanner bed might work for some things, I guess. What we run into is when there are things like glass bottles that have been broken. They always sort of get this odd distorted field, like they have an iridescent sheen. That, and the clear ones always take on the color of what is behind them. That's not something that can really be helped, it seems, so we'll just have to deal.
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to antilogicgirl [2009-10-19 05:13:48 +0000 UTC]
I haven't run into that effect yet, but I haven't tried to scan that sort of thing. I'll keep that in mind. Thank you.
π: 0 β©: 0
maxwildcat [2009-10-18 14:34:16 +0000 UTC]
warning: this item should not be used to play badminton ...
looks great on your wall though
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to maxwildcat [2009-10-18 18:27:13 +0000 UTC]
Or other complex tunes of that sort....
π: 0 β©: 0
Beledra [2009-10-18 12:22:01 +0000 UTC]
You can try to teke a photo, is much better than the scan for 3D objects
π: 0 β©: 1
DonSimpson In reply to Beledra [2009-10-18 18:35:17 +0000 UTC]
I've found that scanning is better for most of my works, because they are small enough to be in focus and the scanner can get very fine detail, but this exceeds the scanner's capabilities.
π: 0 β©: 0