HOME | DD

Description
With all the fuzz around Tyrannosaurid scales I guess we were all a bit shaken up, not really because of Bell et al. (2017) itself but more because of the media going full JP fanboy. Luckily there were lots of other replies to give a more nuanced look at the paper so there's that. With that all in mind I decided to draw some Tyrannosaurids again, because I hadn't drawn one a while before the paper and after the paper I hadn't drawn any others either
because I was waiting for all the blogposts, journals and opinions and busy with finals.
Now that I've seen enough about it and I also have the actual time to do some free time drawing it was time to grab the pencils and fineliners again.

So, with Tyrannosaurus showing a wide distribution of scales I'm off the densely feathered wagon and will go for mostly scaly with sparse feathers based on Witton as well as this by .
You might also be aware of Carr et al. (2017) and their Tyrannosaurid facial integument, but their arguments for it aren't particularly strong so I partly disagree and go for keratinized skin on the face like a crocodile, but with a full set of lips.

Also, be aware that even though Tyrannosaurus might be mostly scaly, the scales could also not even be true scales but reticula as in birds (modified feathers that look like scales) which means it not always has to be a reptilian look for Tyrannosaurids. Maybe not even Tyrannosaurus itself when not fully grown or depending on the location of the population. (or even the seasons)

That's why I have a fully feathered Nanuqsaurus here because this Alaskan dwarf species would probably turn into an icicle during winter if it wasnt feathered. There's also a partly feathered Albertosaurus of which we have officially described scale imprints too now, but they're only from the abdomen and Gorgosaurus (which is same-sized and has remains from the same region as Albertosaurus) has some on the tail. These two animals are however inbetween Nanuqsaurus and Tyrannosaurus so how feathered would they be? I went for something inbetween the two, because 1. there's a way larger part of the body we have no impressions whatsoever from and 2. I just wondered about how feathers would retreat during Tyrannosaurid evolution. What I drew here is something similar to how I drew rexes before, but the coat itself is not as dense. Again, this might've varied too for reasons I mentioned earlier.

To get a good look of what we now all have of Tyrannosauroid integument, there's this nice shart.

Description
With all the fuzz around Tyrannosaurid scales I guess we were all a bit shaken up, not really because of Bell et al. (2017) itself but more because of the media going full JP fanboy. Luckily there were lots of other replies to give a more nuanced look at the paper so there's that. With that all in mind I decided to draw some Tyrannosaurids again, because I hadn't drawn one a while before the paper and after the paper I hadn't drawn any others either
because I was waiting for all the blogposts, journals and opinions and busy with finals.
Now that I've seen enough about it and I also have the actual time to do some free time drawing it was time to grab the pencils and fineliners again.

So, with Tyrannosaurus showing a wide distribution of scales I'm off the densely feathered wagon and will go for mostly scaly with sparse feathers based on Witton as well as this by .
You might also be aware of Carr et al. (2017) and their Tyrannosaurid facial integument, but their arguments for it aren't particularly strong so I partly disagree and go for keratinized skin on the face like a crocodile, but with a full set of lips.

Also, be aware that even though Tyrannosaurus might be mostly scaly, the scales could also not even be true scales but reticula as in birds (modified feathers that look like scales) which means it not always has to be a reptilian look for Tyrannosaurids. Maybe not even Tyrannosaurus itself when not fully grown or depending on the location of the population. (or even the seasons)

That's why I have a fully feathered Nanuqsaurus here because this Alaskan dwarf species would probably turn into an icicle during winter if it wasnt feathered. There's also a partly feathered Albertosaurus of which we have officially described scale imprints too now, but they're only from the abdomen and Gorgosaurus (which is same-sized and has remains from the same region as Albertosaurus) has some on the tail. These two animals are however inbetween Nanuqsaurus and Tyrannosaurus so how feathered would they be? I went for something inbetween the two, because 1. there's a way larger part of the body we have no impressions whatsoever from and 2. I just wondered about how feathers would retreat during Tyrannosaurid evolution. What I drew here is something similar to how I drew rexes before, but the coat itself is not as dense. Again, this might've varied too for reasons I mentioned earlier.

To get a good look of what we now all have of Tyrannosauroid integument, there's this nice shart.