HOME | DD

Published: 2011-06-17 09:57:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 155233; Favourites: 5976; Downloads: 1765
Redirect to original
Description
----------
Photoshop CS3
Related content
Comments: 1038
Mibicci In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 06:56:47 +0000 UTC]
His hand is blocking my sight.... I love that shipping ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
ChaosLydia In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 06:56:28 +0000 UTC]
I wish I could draw half as good as you.... or even a quarter!
I love how you draw muscles. Some people draw them so bulky and unrealistic. But you have a nice proportion to their bodies so it's not too much. I guess the simple way to put it is they don't look like they're on steroids
I also totally want to know the story behind this and why Nightwing is injured. I have 12 million tales in my head to fill in the gap
π: 0 β©: 0
madyb In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 06:53:11 +0000 UTC]
its now official that most of deviantarters are either gay or retarded.
don't take it wrong i have friends both retarded and gay.
π: 0 β©: 3
blue-shadow-feather In reply to madyb [2011-06-18 07:51:30 +0000 UTC]
Just because someone draws something gay doesn't mean they are gay or retarded. If I drew a mentally handicapped person, I'm not retarded. If I draw something gay, I'm not gay. :\
That's totally ignorant to think.
But don't take it in the wrong way; a lot of people are ignorant. <_<
π: 0 β©: 1
madyb In reply to blue-shadow-feather [2011-06-18 08:06:41 +0000 UTC]
yeah exactly by the way of ur writing i can totally say that u re an ignorant person too. since i referred to most and never meant u are a gay but most deviantarters since its the most popular thing of today.
so i assume i now have ignorant mates also.
π: 0 β©: 1
blue-shadow-feather In reply to madyb [2011-06-18 08:19:18 +0000 UTC]
... I was using myself as an example. I wasn't taking it personally. By the fact that you zeroed in on that just proves my point.
Just because someone draws a cup doesn't mean they're a cup. Just because someone draws a dog (a lot of people draw dogs--animals in general--by the way) doesn't mean they're a dog. If they draw a hobo, they're not homeless. If they draw something homosexual, they're not necessarily homosexual. Those better examples for you?
π: 0 β©: 1
madyb In reply to blue-shadow-feather [2011-06-18 09:54:05 +0000 UTC]
your point of wiev is so narrow that u keep hold urself in the position of not being able to understand what i say. i never meant anything to ur art nor to you but given the fact such a gay frame got really popular its most likely people who made it fav. are either gay or people who are out of batman concept but yet still they like it just to like it which on deviantart most people do.
but of course stick ur head to if u draw cup you re not a cup thing. how's this even related?
π: 0 β©: 1
blue-shadow-feather In reply to madyb [2011-06-19 01:26:16 +0000 UTC]
First of all, your typing is quite awful... e__e;
Let me make this even more blatantly clear for you:
I'm not talking about myself. Once again, I used myself as an example. For pity sake. And once again, I'm not taking this personally... e___e; Do you understand that yet?
And it's related because you're saying "If you draw something gay, you're gay", in which, "if you draw a cup, you're a cup." It's not that hard to get how it's related. U: They're all examples derived from your statement.
And you're furthermore proving my point of ignorance.
π: 0 β©: 1
madyb In reply to blue-shadow-feather [2011-06-19 06:25:06 +0000 UTC]
you have already proven my point on you being an ignorant person. it's quite obvious who's and who's not. you say :'/:'/ im not taking it personally leave britney alone" yet still on the other hand u put urself in the example, in the center of this arguement and yet bloody god damn still as i wrote most u do not understand or not able to.
and i still state that u just can't relate if u draw a cup you're a cup statement as i said nothing like that but most deviantarters who liked it like gayness obviously.
u make nothing clear but put urself in a funny situation. and thanks my writing skills require no judgement from u, as you're not even able to understand what's prefectly written and getting offended uber fast. it's always the same, u're a human and u take it offensive (of course giving the facts on what i said) and because it's ur art(which i personally find quite good) u take it on urself.
thanks for taking ur ignorance to the next level.
π: 0 β©: 1
blue-shadow-feather In reply to madyb [2011-06-20 02:10:22 +0000 UTC]
-Blink.- ... Ya know, if I knew you were going to zero in on my placing myself absently as an example, I wouldn't have done it... e__e; My apologies as to putting myself in the example. How 'bout we pretend I didn't, since it wasn't literally me I was injecting into this toggle?
And if you can't relate that, I don't know how else to put it simple for you. |: And yeah, those who did like it obviously like ... 'gayness'. But that doesn't make themselves gay. Everybody has their likes, and everybody has their dislikes--such as yourself. Such as myself (oh-no! Did I just inject myself as an example again? Whoa!)
And, um... I'm not offended? :\ I'm not offended because as I've stated, I'm not taking this personally. I'm speaking for others, if you hadn't caught that. And I wasn't judging your writing 'skills'. It's a simple opinion.
As you've stated yours. Opinion, I mean.
And I wasn't whatsoever inserting my art into this; none of my art shows 'gayness', so thus, it's invalid to use as an example of anything.
And my ignorance? Ignorance of what, exactly? You rambling on about me taking something offensive of which I couldn't care less about? Or the fact you don't seem to comprehend my words, which in turn apparently makes me unable to understand yours? |: Which part? Hm? I'm growing tired of this... :\
π: 0 β©: 2
animelover08831 In reply to blue-shadow-feather [2011-06-20 06:06:33 +0000 UTC]
I have to agree with you. Just because people liked this didn't mean that they did it for the reasons Madyb stated. They could have liked it for the artists style or their liking of the comic.
Just because Jane/John Smith likes superheroes doesn't mean s/he is one. Just because X liked this doesn't mean that they are gay/mentally retarded/Y.
And since when is liking something on DeviantArt a crime? Art is art. I think that Madyb should respect everyones right to like what they want to.
π: 0 β©: 1
blue-shadow-feather In reply to animelover08831 [2011-06-21 05:26:11 +0000 UTC]
Heh. Yes. I've seen my fair share of some... interesting things, but I can nevertheless see the lines and color and effort they put into the piece itself.
Thank you. C:
π: 0 β©: 0
madyb In reply to blue-shadow-feather [2011-06-20 05:47:09 +0000 UTC]
and so am i, tho i wonder if you couldn't care less how come u write a whole composition. anyways i also am hating this convo or whatever we're having so have a nice day.
π: 0 β©: 1
blue-shadow-feather In reply to madyb [2011-06-21 05:23:07 +0000 UTC]
What I meant but 'couldn't care less', is that I couldn't care less about arguing with you. Although that doesn't mean I wasn't still going to say my final piece.
And yes... The most intelligence thing I've heard thus far. x)
π: 0 β©: 1
madyb In reply to blue-shadow-feather [2011-06-21 06:32:19 +0000 UTC]
that's because ur brain only can understand this low states i suppose. you just can't drop it can you?
π: 0 β©: 1
blue-shadow-feather In reply to madyb [2011-06-21 09:36:19 +0000 UTC]
... I... did? The whole 'The most intelligence thing I've heard thus far" was sort of the closure line, dude... e_e;
And what the hell does 'this low states' mean? If you're going to bother speaking with someone, you can at least speak with some sort of literacy. :\
And because of that statement of yours proves that you can't drop it... e__e; This tiff is useless.
For your best interest, I suggest you, ya know, take your own advice and drop this by, ya know, not replying. e__e; Just sayin'.
π: 0 β©: 1
madyb In reply to blue-shadow-feather [2011-06-21 19:49:51 +0000 UTC]
wow u literally are playing the retard here aren't you?
π: 0 β©: 1
blue-shadow-feather In reply to madyb [2011-06-22 08:55:59 +0000 UTC]
... What? e__e That's extremely offensive to say, dude. What the hell?
π: 0 β©: 0
Gene78012 In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 06:42:54 +0000 UTC]
Obviously not cannon....but i'd totes get behind this sorta shipping. Everything about it is very well done, even to the comicy/toony artstyle. Goodwork!
π: 0 β©: 0
GinRyu In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 06:33:42 +0000 UTC]
I'm so sorry you have to read any idiotic comments on this artwork. You did an absolutely amazing job: pose, shading, etc, it's all beautiful.
GG, man!
π: 0 β©: 0
mehproductions In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 06:11:42 +0000 UTC]
Brb, adding this to the wiki entry for homoeroticism
Love the pose. Great lighting. Unf.
π: 0 β©: 0
gabrielaBmedina In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 06:08:46 +0000 UTC]
That is .... amazing
*//*
-nosebleeds-
π: 0 β©: 0
ruthcruz In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:58:04 +0000 UTC]
This is full of deliciousness~~
π: 0 β©: 0
harukaplanetpower In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:34:54 +0000 UTC]
This is so amazing!!! And the oddest part, I know this won't make any sense, but I love the position of Robin's foot and how graceful and artistic it is. Sorry that is odd.
π: 0 β©: 0
Darkest-Deeds13 In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:31:26 +0000 UTC]
I wish I could fave this more than once!!!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
MALLRATS2005 In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:28:58 +0000 UTC]
amazing job <3 love there expressions
π: 0 β©: 0
NavyTears In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:28:23 +0000 UTC]
This kinda reminds me of the Batman Beyond 6-issue series they did last year. Nightwing was seriously injured and he had to quit.
π: 0 β©: 0
tanfukang In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:25:48 +0000 UTC]
this is fucking gay. in a bad way.
π: 0 β©: 1
daffffodilll In reply to tanfukang [2011-06-18 05:27:06 +0000 UTC]
jesus, don't ya'think that's a bit disrespectful?
you should keep your bad thoughts to yourself if they are not of any help/critique
π: 0 β©: 1
tanfukang In reply to daffffodilll [2011-06-18 05:39:00 +0000 UTC]
hey, its a comment section, its only heathy that the author or artist gets a fair amount of good critiques and bad ones.not all critiques will be smiled upon, other wise, it might as well be a fan page.
π: 0 β©: 6
Gene78012 In reply to tanfukang [2011-06-18 06:51:15 +0000 UTC]
You're fucking stupid. in a bad way
...see what i did there? XD
π: 0 β©: 0
fairygodpiggy In reply to tanfukang [2011-06-18 06:22:07 +0000 UTC]
Whether you like it or not, this is art. If you want to give a critique, you should give the artist advice on what they could improve on, aspects that may not have worked, or what you would like to see in a future piece of art... And saying, "Next time I'd like to see something less gay" is not a critique. This is DeviantArt where artists are free to display their talents and hard work. Doing this stuff from scratch on Photoshop or any other program is hard work and the outcome should not be berated by someone who happens not to like the subject. I'm not going to go to your gallery and bash it just because I don't like it, so now I bring up the classic rule that we all learn as children: "Treat others the way you want to be treated."
π: 0 β©: 0
daffffodilll In reply to tanfukang [2011-06-18 06:07:27 +0000 UTC]
yeah, but yours wasn't much of a critique.
you simply said 'it is fucking gay and in the bad way'
i don't really find that as a critique to the art itself
i actually consider it bashing if anything at all (:
π: 0 β©: 0
abeo-clandestine In reply to tanfukang [2011-06-18 06:03:28 +0000 UTC]
criΒ·tique/kriΛtΔk/
Noun: A detailed analysis and assessment of something, esp. a literary, philosophical, or political theory.
Verb: Evaluate (a theory or practice) in a detailed and analytical way: "the authors critique the methods used in research".
P.S I second RanaTilion's comment.
π: 0 β©: 0
SaR-ness In reply to tanfukang [2011-06-18 06:02:45 +0000 UTC]
What the fuck? Stating a messed-up opinion that isn't constructively deconstructive or vice-versa isn't critism-- it's being a dick. Pull that stick out of your ass, and take your rude, pointless comments somewhere else, because I guarantee they aren't welcome here. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's a definite reason for the artist to to do anything about it, nor does it change the fact that some people actually enjoy it. Get over yourself.
And there is absolutely no right or wrong way to be gay--it just is.
π: 0 β©: 1
Le-Mat In reply to SaR-ness [2011-06-18 06:40:03 +0000 UTC]
Just as not wrong is making a statement that it is gay. What? It's only right to comment the technique in this case, not the content, just because it may be politically incorrect? Besides, here on DA You have separate section to make "critique" and this is "comment" section, where people usualy write stuff like "Nice", or "I like it, come check out my page" or "lol" or just put some emoticons. This was just a comment-like statement of a fact. Fact that not anyone want to say loud just because they're affraid of being accused of intolerance. If he commented artistic nude photo that is clearly heterosexually themed, that is on the edge of being pornographic, and added "in a bad way", every thing would be allright.
What about freedome of speech?
It's paranoia.
π: 0 β©: 1
SaR-ness In reply to Le-Mat [2011-06-18 06:49:59 +0000 UTC]
It is a comment section, but your comments should be at least worth reading. People say stupid things like that because there is either one) nothing else to say, or two) those were the exact comments the artist was going for. And, if it is a comment section, why is he claiming that he's only criticizing? There is a section for that yes, but I don't think he would even know how to use it. Moreover, how is saying "in the bad way" make anything okay? Speaking through equality and not through my own biased opinion, nothing is technically wrong or right, because everyone's opinions are different. Also, if "freedome" of speech was legitimate, I wouldn't have to hold back my tongue just because someone won't like what I have to say. There is no such thing as freedom--only control. And you're right, it is paranoia.
π: 0 β©: 1
Le-Mat In reply to SaR-ness [2011-06-18 08:59:58 +0000 UTC]
It's a pitty that comments under some work became a forum of discussion that the work it self is no longer a subject of it.
π: 0 β©: 1
SaR-ness In reply to Le-Mat [2011-06-18 17:16:29 +0000 UTC]
I think those comments are probably my least favorite, too.
π: 0 β©: 0
RanaTilion In reply to tanfukang [2011-06-18 05:50:57 +0000 UTC]
But that's not a critique. And FYI there is no bad way to be gay.
π: 0 β©: 0
Frayta In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:21:39 +0000 UTC]
That background reminds me of the case on my poor retired CPU.
π: 0 β©: 0
Natsumi1122 In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:21:08 +0000 UTC]
nice work on the shading
keep it up!
π: 0 β©: 0
Aedien1 In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:17:23 +0000 UTC]
Wow, just....wow I swear there were little hearts in my eyes when I saw this!
π: 0 β©: 0
SoloGrayson In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:15:48 +0000 UTC]
God. My Lady boner is so hard right now.
π: 0 β©: 0
CrimsonPaw In reply to ??? [2011-06-18 05:14:16 +0000 UTC]
THIS MADE MY DAY. THIS MADE MY DAY. THIS MADE MY DAY.
Seriously...Nightwing does NOT get enough credit for being an awesome character AND a sexy beast!
Also, in your style... *doubleleaf , you just made this Batman-whore's day (seriously....hug BMan whore)
π: 0 β©: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>